Girl Scouts have gone Transgender

So, will they kick out any girls that are tom-boys?

It doesn't surprise me this is happening in Colorado.

 

Too bad! I used to love buying their cookies, but no more.

 

Actually, other than Chips Ahoy or Oreos, we make our own.

I liked supporting the Girl Scouts, until they started down the road they are on now.

 

Keebler also has knock off's that are better than the original samoas and thin mints.

It should be noted this is only in Colorado.

 

http://www.9news.com/rss/story.aspx?storyid=226301

 

Where is C4K's Comment...

...About the Sensationalism of this Post?

According to a recent comment from C4K, when I questioned him as to why he always commented and accused me of making my posts "sensational," he informed me that he tagged all those posts that were sensationalizing subjects as being such.

His voice is strangely missing on this post. Hmmmm? :laugh:

 

Get over it; your continual whining about C4K is getting old!

 

This is Not as Unusual as One May Think...

....A few weeks ago I did a story on another youngster that was "begging" to change sex.

SEE: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2011/10/1...ng-grid10|htmlws-main-bb|dl1|sec3_lnk1|105146

This one, on the Girl Scouts, is just one more incident, that I believe is the "tip of the iceberg" and not a once in a life time event.

If the Girl Scouts condone this, I for one will cease buying their cookies, and being an advocate for their program.

I know some of you may question my thought about this, but, in a recent interview with Chaz Bono, he made it clear that his book and public advocacy for the transgendered lifestyle are his life goal and purpose.

I'm sure his name will surface somewhere along the way in the life of these two young children.

I for one was thankful to God that Bono was finally voted off Dancing with the Stars. Now that Bono and the other gay star have been voted off, I can resume watching a chow I mildly enjoy.

I am against anyone changing the sex they were born to be, but I can't stop them from making the decision. HOWEVER, I am vehemently opposed to anyone under the age of 21 years old, being allowed to make that choice. :tear:

 

Not really. This incident is only in Colorado, but this is one more in a long line of affronts by the Girl Scouts organization across the country. Do you remember the pornographic "childrens" book they were pushing a few years ago, that had instructions on, well, how to do certain things... horrible. This organization as a whole needs to be shut down for child abuse.

 

Relax everyone, this is the new heaven and earth, and the millennial reign, where righteousness and justice rule, it's all good.

 

Please remember this when something negative is said about Calvinism. :thumbs:

 

:thumbsup:

 

I guess private messages are really not so 'private' after all. I though we had sort of a 'gentlemen's agreement' on this board that things posted in private messages were to be kept, well, private.

No sensationalism in the OP here. I saw the tile, thought 'Surely, this is an exaggeration,' and saw that it wasn't. This is a tragedy and an accurate reporting of it.

 

Charlie Brown, Charlie Brown
He's a clown, that Charlie Brown
He's gonna get caught
Just you wait and see
(Why's everybody always pickin' on me)

 

You Are Right....

....I went back and checked my PM, and that was something you mentioned in one of our E-mails.

For making what was private, a public issue, I can only apologize. It was an error in my judgment of what you believed should be kept private. raying:

When it came to something as important as what you were always commenting that my posts were "sensational" in one way or the other, was a concern I did address with you.

I didn't think you'd mind me sharing your response to my concern, simply because it was something you proclaimed to do regularly in an effort to keep those of us who use sensationalism to grad the attention of others in order to be read.

I can't see why you'd be upset bringing to light something you proudly proclaimed to do regularly to ALL members who sensationalize their posts.

I searched you this site for other times that you accused others of "sensationalizing" their posts, and did not find any other times that you made this statement about other posts, but if it is, in fact, one of your proclaimed duties to expose those who sensationalize posts, then why would you care if I pointed it out. After all, if this is something, you have a habit of doing, it was not a secret, nor was it a hidden agenda that others wouldn't be surprised about when finding out???

Again, I didn't think sharing something you told me you do quite regular was a violation of your trust. I will make sure that nothing else you shred with me becomes a public, promise. :love2:

It was not my intent to share anything with others that you said you do quite often. I hope you can find it in your heart to forgive me for stepping on something you felt was TOO personal to share with others. :tonofbricks:

 

Can You Also...

.... Dance, whistle and juggle several Bibles while you dangle your sarcasm around a place that is meant to uplift our Lord. Your insinuations are unacceptable, especially since your proclaim to be a believer. A highly intellectual believer, but, no less a believer, just like the rest of us. :tear:

 

I have never emailed you. You may get PMs through your email I don't even have your address. All PMs (private messages) are called that because they are private. I don't have to put the word 'private' in bold or colours or big letters or anything else to make my point.

Your conditional apology is accepted.