Is glfredrick "clueless"?

nah, you're just a Calvinist that is blinded by your own theology.





(that's different from being clueless right?)

(yes, my tongue is firmly in my cheek.)

 

Nope :thumbsup:

 

Not clueless. There is a hint of noncal in the mix, but you are definitely not clueless. Your learning is evident.

webdawg, on the otherhand . . .

 

Glf cannot even start a poll correctly. What is the context, glf? Football? Cricket? Chemistry? Understanding your opponent's position?

If the shoe fits...

Aaron must be wearing the other...

 

Let me help you put this in context. My statement was in response to...

...which is CLEARLY an open theist position (something neither I nor others who hold a view similar to mine hold to).

NONE of us have a problem with the sovereignty of God. It is merely a pejorative that is thrown around by glf...or if he actually believes such nonsense, let it be known on record concerning THIS...he is quite clueless.

The fact someone would even start such a juvenile thread and poll speaks volumes.

 

I agree and in order for those who use it to be honest and credible it should come to an end. Their integrity is at stake here.

 

...but he will come back and say it is not, that it is the truth. This makes him clueless on this particular matter, and my point stands. I won't vote in the poll since it is not qualified, but I am on the record stating concerning THIS he is absolutely "clueless". As long as he keeps regurgitating such nonsense the label applies.

 

Everyone, other than me, is clueless. So, obviously I voted that he is clueless.

 

I also put the comment in context, unlike you...but what else would I expect?

 

And I thought Obama was the audacious one.

 

Glf, if you really want to know; sometimes I think you couldn't get a clue during the clue mating season in a field full of horny clues if you smeared your body with clue musk and did the clue mating dance. :smilewinkgrin:

 

Benjamin, is that a yes or no?

Glfrederick also violated board rules by including a member's name in the subject of a thread, even if its his own. Chalk up another C to "board rules"

 

Sorry webdog, it's you that is clueless on this one.

"Do not use another member's screen names in topic titles."

 

Pure semantics. The point of the administrative rule is to not allow the name of members in threads...ask an admin, I did. They didn't envision people talking about themselves in the third person...so you are quite incorrect.

 

Oh, oh .... I've been named in a bunch of threads. I was clueless it was a BB offense. Shame on all those folk who have named and acronymed me. :smilewinkgrin:

 

Ok, said I couldn't vote...but when someone posts filthy, vulgarity on a Christian site (against board rules) in order to "win" a debate, I must vote now.

 

What post was that?