Sandra Fluke: The Democratic Star Rush Limbaugh Made

Sandra Fluke is only a star to those people who believe that the government should be using other people's money to ensure that extramarital and promiscuous sex without consequence (supposedly) is available free of charge to everyone who wants it.

Why am I not surprised to see that you are in that group?

 

Here is a woman that is 31 years old and wants to force someone else to pay for hers (and others) readily available contraceptives so she can engage in a voluntary activity as old as humanity itself without consequences.

It's no wonder Obama gave her a microphone.

 

Yep. Nauseating.

 

Don't forget they want you to pay for any unintended consequences, the slaughter of the unborn child. All these people need to be considered monsters is a different face. It is like the old movies about aliens who adapt human faces but when unveiled you see how they really look; Monsters!

 

Are you carrying water for this woman whose name is recognized only because of multi-leveled immortality?

 

If he carries water for the most vicious advocate of the slaughter of the unborn in public life, Barak Obama, he will carry water for anyone with the democrat label. Why should promiscuity at the governments expense deter him?

 

What kind of world do we live in, where a woman demanding others pay for her birth control is a "star" of the party.

ABORTIONPALOOZA.

 

The Feminist Star? Really?

What about the rights of all those unborn little baby girls who are slaughtered in the womb? Where are their rights?

How about their "reproductive rights" they might have some day?

And Flukes "invasive ultrasound" comment gagged me.

What about the "invasive scissors" plunged into the head of a little unborn girl or having her body ripped and torn and the pain she feels as she is sucked out of the womb bit by bit, piece by piece? What about her "rights?"

What about her life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness?

 

Are you asking how your reprobate heroine got her status ?

She was invited to testify before a democrat panel, after Boehner refused to hear her, about this subject long before Rush even knew who she was.

 

Rush did Obama and the Dems a lot more harm by showcasing just how low into the slime the Dems have sunk.

 

Again, not being taken seriously.

 

The first comment is off topic, and inane.

The second statement is not true. She was testifying to democrat congressfolk with a full media contingent, how can you say nobody would know who she was ? I cannot answer a challenge that sets up a false, or supposed premise as settled fact.

Do you hope her stance gets more votes for Obama ?

 

I doubt it. She didn't mention the name of Rush Limbaugh in her speech. Her fans knew who she was referring to, but the general population doesn't much care or follow political goings on as closely as some would hope.

 

I support Boehner's decision to not waste taxpayer money on giving the reprobate heroine time to demand we subsidize her debauchery.

Since Rush got this news off of another conservative source, I would say the damage was done before Rush got a hold of it.

And as far as who wins, after years of not listening to him, this got me to tune into Rush for a while. He still calls people like me "kooks", and that's hard to take.but he is a very funny man. I had to agree with him after listening to him, and I'm sure the glee from the left over this is based on fantasy. I think if people were swayed over this it was towards Romney. Especially since Rush got this news off of another conservative source, I would say the damage was done before Rush got a hold of it.