Will the Church Be Next on GLAAD's Agenda?

With the fall of scouting to pressure from the "happiest people in America" about to be finalized, I have to ask whether the "happy people" will take on the church; and when?

I wonder if there will be lawsuits and political pressure against the non-profit status of churches throughout this nation if churches:

*Refuse to unite these "happy couples" in wedlock?
*Remove "happy people" who come out of the church closets and want to be seen as the "happy crowd" of the local Baptist, Lutheran, AoG, or Catholic church?
*For discharging "happy employees" who step out of the broom closet and announce their intentions to serve the church as one of the "happiest employees" in the organization?
*If churches refuse to let "happy people" join the congregation?
*If the church assesses evil and sin as the root cause behind the reason these people are so "happy?"

There are a number of different issues that GLAAD can use to join hands with the ACLU and lock horns with the local church regarding the right(s) of America's "happiest people" around and the church not permitting these folks to serve on boards; teach Sunday School; be their pastor; use the church for wedding ceremonies; attend camps, have "happy People" clubs inside the walls of churches and other make their affiliation and association with local churches, public knowledge!

Of course, I'm not talking about "happy people" who have had a "come-to-Jesus" moment; confessed their sins; been born-again; water baptised; and denounced not only satan but anything to do with the lifestyle that once made them one of the "happiest people" on earth, and no longer consider themselves "happy people."

I can't help but believe that GLAAD has simply began the process of peeling away the outer layers of private organizations that hold to higher levels of morality, in an attempt to eventually "normalize" every institution in this country?

Actually the "happy persons" agenda is not that old. It started out as talking points in the 80's and got its legs in, or around 1992 [according to the Wikipedia page].

Here's a sound bite from Wikipedia's account of the "happy persons" agenda: In the US, the term "the g*% agenda" was first used in public discourse in 1992 when the Family Research Council, an American conservative Christian group,[2] released a video series called The G*& Agenda as part of a pack of materials campaigning on homos#$ual issues and the "hidden g*% agenda".[3] In the same year the Oregon Citizens Alliance used this video as part of their campaign for Ballot Measure 9 to amend the Oregon Constitution to prevent what the OCA called special rights for gays, lesbians, and bisexuals.[4] Paul Cameron — co-founder of the Institute for the Scientific Investigation of Sexuality in Lincoln, later renamed the Family Research Institute — appeared in the video, wherein he asserted that 75 percent of g*& men regularly ingest feces and that 70-78 percent have had a s#$ually transmitted disease.[5] The G*& Agenda was followed by three other video publications; The G*& Agenda in Public Education (1993), The G*& Agenda: March on Washington (1993) and a feature follow-up Stonewall: 25 Years of Deception (1994). The videos contained interviews with opponents of LGBT rights, and the series was made available through Christian right organizations. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexual_agenda]

 

That is Fatih...`

Thanks....I know that is what I'd choose to do, too!