BaptistBoard.com  
     

Increase font size: 0, 10, 25, 50%
Register FAQ Social Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Left Container Right Container
 
Go Back   BaptistBoard.com > Baptist DEBATE Forums (Baptist Only) > Bible Versions/Translations

Bible Versions/Translations Comparing & Contrasting Bible Versions & Translations

Fewer Ads for Registered Users - Register Now!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-28-2007, 05:00 PM
hawg_427's Avatar
hawg_427 hawg_427 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Florida Panhandle
Posts: 260
Post Les Feldick

Has anybody watched to Les Feldick teach the Bible on TV? If so what is your impression?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-28-2007, 05:10 PM
Amy.G's Avatar
Amy.G Amy.G is offline
10,000 Posts Club
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Southern US
Posts: 13,103
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hawg_427
Has anybody watched to Les Feldick teach the Bible on TV? If so what is your impression?
I have enjoyed his program. Also check out his website. His view of how sin did not come from Mary's nature, but through Adam's was a bit odd for me.
That might make a good thread.
__________________
Matthew 11:28 Come unto me, all ye that labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest.

The Revelation Song
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-30-2007, 03:51 PM
JerryL's Avatar
JerryL JerryL is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: KY
Posts: 972
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amy.G
I have enjoyed his program. Also check out his website. His view of how sin did not come from Mary's nature, but through Adam's was a bit odd for me.
That might make a good thread.
What is odd in your eyes about sin coming from Adam instead of Mary?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-30-2007, 04:04 PM
D28guy D28guy is offline
2,000 Posts Club
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Berea, Ky.
Posts: 2,713
Default

He may have meant to type "Eve", rather than "Mary".

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-30-2007, 04:19 PM
Amy.G's Avatar
Amy.G Amy.G is offline
10,000 Posts Club
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Southern US
Posts: 13,103
Default

It's been a long time since I read this, so I had to do some research to find it.
Here is an excerpt:



Quote:
From Les Feldick.com: This doesn't come easily to our understanding and you really must give this considerably thought. If the female of the species has been insulated from the effects of the curse in the area of reproduction, she cannot pass down from her generation to the next the curse of sin. That has to come through the father!

Physiologically speaking again, there is none of the mother's blood that ever becomes part and parcel of that little baby. The blood comes from the father. Always remember that!

Now, the line of the curse comes through the blood - through the father. So every human being, as we have been stressing through these early lessons in Genesis, is a born sinner by virtue of the fact that he has inherited it through his father, not through his mother, although she is just as much a sinner as the father is.
Here is the link
http://www.lesfeldick.org/lesqa-c.html#2c
__________________
Matthew 11:28 Come unto me, all ye that labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest.

The Revelation Song
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-30-2007, 04:52 PM
Deacon Deacon is offline
5,000 Posts Club
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Holland, PA
Posts: 5,792
Angry

Quote:
Physiologically speaking again, there is none of the mother's blood that ever becomes part and parcel of that little baby. The blood comes from the father. Always remember that!
Aarrrrggggh! That is pure hogwash.
Preachers ought to preach truth from the word.
They shouldn't force science into supporting their points.

Physiologically speaking an infants blood is all its own.
However an infants blood is formed from genetic material from both the father and the mother.

I've never heard of Les Feldick but if this is his stuff I'd have to wonder.

Rob
__________________
"If people put their faith in either a text or in a particular, modern method of reading a text, their faith is misplaced. People should be better educated theologically to realize that the Christian reading of scripture must be learned and practiced as an activity of faith in God, with assurance of the Holy Spirit will not lead us to perdition if we read in faith and with love as our guide and goal."
The Reliability of the New Testament: Bart Ehrman and Daniel Wallace in Dialogue, p.92-93

Last edited by Deacon; 12-30-2007 at 04:55 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-30-2007, 04:58 PM
Amy.G's Avatar
Amy.G Amy.G is offline
10,000 Posts Club
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Southern US
Posts: 13,103
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Deacon
Aarrrrggggh! That is pure hogwash.
Preachers ought to preach truth from the word.
They shouldn't force science into supporting their points.

Physiologically speaking an infants blood is all its own.
However an infants blood is formed from genetic material from both the father and the mother.

I've never heard of Les Feldick but if this is his stuff I'd have to wonder.

Rob
Like I said, I thought it was odd.

Maybe he's right, I don't know, but it sounds rather "out there".

I've never read anything in the Bible to support it.
__________________
Matthew 11:28 Come unto me, all ye that labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest.

The Revelation Song
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-30-2007, 11:08 PM
Ed Edwards Ed Edwards is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Heavenly Central Oklahoma
Posts: 15,715
Default

Les Feldick:
//Physiologically speaking again, there is none of the mother's blood
that ever becomes part and parcel of that little baby.
The blood comes from the father. Always remember that!//

Quote:
Originally Posted by Deacon

Aarrrrggggh! That is pure hogwash.
Preachers ought to preach truth from the word.
They shouldn't force science into supporting their points.

Physiologically speaking an infants blood is all its own.
However an infants blood is formed from genetic material from both the father and the mother.

I've never heard of Les Feldick but if this is his stuff I'd have to wonder.

Rob
Amen, Brother Deacon Rob -- Preach it!

This statement: "blood comes from the father"
is the determining factor of Caste in Hindu
Doctrine. Those who teach "blood comes
from the father" are teaching Hindu Doctrine

NOT Christian Doctrine.
I've read the Holy Bible several times since i've
been a Christian the past 55 years.
I never found even a hint that the
"blood comes from the father".
__________________


All VALID English Language Bibles
Collectively and Individually
contain and are
the Inerrant and Perfect
Written Word of God
preserved by Divine Appointment
for the generation in which they are translated.





Last edited by Ed Edwards; 12-30-2007 at 11:11 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-30-2007, 11:31 PM
John of Japan's Avatar
John of Japan John of Japan is offline
10,000 Posts Club
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 10,673
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amy.G
Like I said, I thought it was odd.

Maybe he's right, I don't know, but it sounds rather "out there".

I've never read anything in the Bible to support it.
It's a fairly old and common view. It's originator may be M. R. DeHaan, a medical doctor turned well known Bible teacher, in his book The Chemistry of the Blood (1943). His view actually was that blood does not appear until after fertilization, so in that sense the baby receives no blood from its mother. He connects this (p. 31 ff) with the federal headship view of how Adam's sin is imputed to us, and thus the creationist view of how the soul is formed--that is, directly by God each time rather than being imparted from the parents. Thus, Christ was humanly without a sin nature because his blood, as received through the Holy Spirit's action in the virgin birth, was untainted.
__________________
"Trust me. I know what I'm doing." Sledge Hammer
"If there be any one point in which the Christian church ought to keep its fervour at a white heat, it is concerning missions to the heathens." Charles Spurgeon
"Certainty of death. Small chance of success. What are we waiting for?" Gimli, "Return of the King"
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-31-2007, 01:24 AM
D28guy D28guy is offline
2,000 Posts Club
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Berea, Ky.
Posts: 2,713
Default

Quote:
"It's a fairly old and common view. It's originator may be M. R. DeHaan, a medical doctor turned well known Bible teacher, in his book The Chemistry of the Blood (1943). His view actually was that blood does not appear until after fertilization, so in that sense the baby receives no blood from its mother. He connects this (p. 31 ff) with the federal headship view of how Adam's sin is imputed to us, and thus the creationist view of how the soul is formed--that is, directly by God each time rather than being imparted from the parents. Thus, Christ was humanly without a sin nature because his blood, as received through the Holy Spirit's action in the virgin birth, was untainted."
Interesting. Martin DeHaan certainly has a stellar reputation in the evangelical world.

Whether Felick is correct or not about this particular topic, I would recommend him to anyone. I used to watch his TV broadcast and have resourced his web-site many times. An excellant teacher of the scriptures, imo.

Mike
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:11 AM.


The Fundamental Top 500   The Best Baptist Web Sites at Baptist411.com  
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Style Copyright: Wrestling Clique Wrestling Forum
Ad Management plugin by RedTyger
 
 

Christian Web Hosting for BaptistBoard.com is provided by BaptistHost.net