1 child, 3 biological contributors

Discussion in 'General Baptist Discussions' started by quantumfaith, Feb 28, 2014.

  1. quantumfaith

    quantumfaith
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2010
    Messages:
    6,890
    Likes Received:
    0
  2. thisnumbersdisconnected

    thisnumbersdisconnected
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2013
    Messages:
    8,448
    Likes Received:
    0
  3. go2church

    go2church
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2002
    Messages:
    4,304
    Likes Received:
    6
    I'll have to think about this one. On the one hand genetic defects are being eliminated or reduced. On the other hand you have something we haven't had before, three genetic biological contributors and the possibility of genetic manipulation.

    I guess I would initially say, no - the "good" in this instance doesn't seem to outweigh the potential for "bad". I really need to think through and consider all the possible ramifications this could bring about in our world. So I guess that's a firm maybe.

    All that aside, the things scientists are attempting today are just amazing. Perhaps not always good amazing, but amazing nonetheless.
     
  4. quantumfaith

    quantumfaith
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2010
    Messages:
    6,890
    Likes Received:
    0
    I have not yet given enough thought to the "morality' side of the equation. At the moment, the reservations that I have are related to changes in the genome being passed down for many future generations. Perhaps we don't understand all potential "unintended consequences".
     
  5. righteousdude2

    righteousdude2
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2007
    Messages:
    10,468
    Likes Received:
    138
  6. percho

    percho
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2009
    Messages:
    3,897
    Likes Received:
    37
    Will they still need to be born again?

    If the answer is yes they will never be genetically superior.
     
  7. Aaron

    Aaron
    Expand Collapse
    Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2000
    Messages:
    15,693
    Likes Received:
    242
    Why is morality in quotes?
     
  8. quantumfaith

    quantumfaith
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2010
    Messages:
    6,890
    Likes Received:
    0
    I was intending to imply the religious and metaphysical aspects of the issue.
     
  9. Deacon

    Deacon
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2002
    Messages:
    6,974
    Likes Received:
    129
    The genetics remain the same for the individual.
    The change involves the mitochondria, the energy producing units in the cell.

    For a very small group of people, the mitochondria fail to perform properly.

    This is like a pre-birth transplant of an organ.

    Rob
     
  10. quantumfaith

    quantumfaith
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2010
    Messages:
    6,890
    Likes Received:
    0
    Rob,

    I agree with your general observation. However, as we "fiddle" with DNA, is there possibility of unintended consequences (other than positive) for future progeny of those who may have had "adjusted" or transplanted mitochondrial DNA sequences?
     
  11. Aaron

    Aaron
    Expand Collapse
    Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2000
    Messages:
    15,693
    Likes Received:
    242
    Quotes used as in your post typically imply falsehood.
     
  12. Aaron

    Aaron
    Expand Collapse
    Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2000
    Messages:
    15,693
    Likes Received:
    242
    IOW:

    We're messing with Evolution!
     
  13. quantumfaith

    quantumfaith
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2010
    Messages:
    6,890
    Likes Received:
    0
    I guess one could say that about naturalists. I do get you want to poke me on the issue.
     

Share This Page

Loading...