10 commandments and Judge Roy Moore

Should Christians support the liberal left wing media - and others in their attempts to abolish God's 10 commandments?

The 10 commandments are etched above the chair of the chief justice of the supreme court of the United States. They are engraved in the doors to the supreme court AND on the walls on the outside the building.

Should they be sandblasted off?

How far does God want us to go in abolishing His Own 10 commandments from our country?

In Christ,

Bob

 

If the rule is that nothing can be specifically Jewish or Christian - then not only does the supreme court of the U.S have a problem with the 10 commandments --- but the symbol of the cross as Yelsew noted is going to be a huge problem.

Between the houses of congress there is a giant murial depicting the signing of the constitution - in it there is a huge Bible opened to Matt 5 "as if" this book played a significant role in that document. Guess what? Matt 5 is not Islamic!

In the House of representatives there are frescos of law makers placed along the walls. Each one is a side-view of a famous lawmaker in history. But there is "one" placed in the "center of them all". His face is fully represented instead of a side-view.

It is Moses. And the reason they gave is because Moses was GIVEN the Law - he did not MAKE it. It is recognition that God was the author of Moses' law and that His law is supreme to all man-made laws.

But "oh yeah" we are NOT specifically identifying the Bible - (the 66) or anything in it --- right?


In Christ,

Bob

 

Email --

President George W. Bush: [email protected]

Vice President Richard Cheney: [email protected]

To lookup any senator's email --
http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm

Sessions, Jeff - (R - AL) Class II
335 RUSSELL SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-4124
E-mail: [email protected]

Shelby, Richard - (R - AL) Class III
110 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-5744
E-mail: [email protected]

 

Some of our more liberal media claim that Martin Luther King is NOT an example of discerning the RIGHT lawful powers of the judicial system vs an abuse of it - that can be used by Americans supportive of the Ten Commandments in courtrooms LIKE the Supreme Court of the United States.

They try to remove King's example - by saying that Rev MLK was opposed to prayer in schools.

However - that is a nonsequiter. His right to protest abuses of the judicial system is SHARED by those who are now protesting against other abuses EVEN IF he did not fully understand all other abuses of that same judicial system.

In Christ,

Bob

 

The States should have the SAME right to display and promote the 10 Commandments as the Federal system - that currently displays the 10 commandments in ITS supreme court justice building in Washington D.C.

The constiution does not give the States LESS rights than the federal govt in this regard - it gives them MORE rights by only restricting the Federal Government.

Why is that so difficult for the liberal media?

In Christ,

Bob

 

Roy Moore is like Boris Yeltsin on his tank saying to 70 yeas of communism "Enough is Enough"!!

Judge Moore - is facing 70 years of "social engineers" in the judicial office. 70 years of basing the "constructionists" who would "Hold to the constitution".

Judg Moore is fighting AGAINST those who violate the separation of church and stated where the constitution is ammended to say "Congress shall make NO LAW".

The social-engineers have twisted that around to say "Congress shall make NO LAW" restricting the free exercise of the FEDERAL courts to display the Ten Commandments - JUST the Sates are RESTRICTED from that FREE exercise.

But the Constitution was written to say that the FEDERAL system shall make NO LAW restricting the STATES in THEIR free exercise.

So what happens now?

NOW a Federal Court rules that HIDING THE Ten Commandments in a CLOSET is KEEPING the FEDERAL law - made by the Federal JUDGE NOT by Congress - that RESTRICTS the FREE exercise of the STATE.

Well - then there is Judge Moore standing on his tank saying - 70 years of this is "enough".

In Christ,

Bob

 

GraceSaves --

Your argument "IS" an argument for sandblasting the Supreme court of the Unite States to remove all vestiges of the Ten commandments FROM that building.

It is an argument for arresting Congress as it uses tax dollars to pay for a Christian prayer said at the start of each session.

It is an argument for sanblasting the giant mural between the two houses of congress showing Matt 5 as the basis for the constitution.

It is an argument that would "show" by these and many other examples that the Federal system ITSELF was established on the FREE EXERCISE of the Christian religion EVEN in Government institutions.

Your point is well taken - the Federal government is exercising specifially CHRISTIAN forms of "Free Exercise". I agree with you there.

HOWEVER that FREE EXERCISE is exactly what the constitution protected for the STATES not the Federal Government. NOW what we have is the FEDERAL system FREE to CONTINUE its practice started while violating the constitution to MAKE "judicial-laws" restricting the free exercise of the States!!

The point is not the the Ten Commandments "lose power" here. The point is that we ARE endorsing a violation of the separation between church and state WHEN we support "judicial laws" that RESTRICT free exercise. It is "negative prejudice" exercised AGAINST Christianity in this case - but a violation of the separation none-the-less.

ONCE you go into that door and start saying SOME violation is "ok" (if it is negative AGAINST Christianity) then you open the door to POSITIVE prejudice as well. The SAME argument can be used - (The one that says it is ok to ignore the ammendment and MAKE LAWS regarding Free Exercise) to create POSITIVE prejudice TOWARDS a given practice of religion. The door swings BOTH ways.

In Christ,

Bob