1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

3 classes of People

Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by Jarthur001, Jul 15, 2006.

  1. Andy T.

    Andy T. Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2005
    Messages:
    3,147
    Likes Received:
    0
    A couple of nights ago I read Wayne Grudem's and Charles Ryrie's systematic theologies regarding God and time. Interestingly, they both have similar views, although Grudem's is more detailed in his book. They both hold to God being outside of time and being able to see "vividly" (as Grudem put it) the past, present and future. However, they both guarded the belief of God being outisde of time in that they also believe that it is clear that God does act in time. I guess the best way to state their position is that God doesn't relate to time like we do where we experience succession of moments, since God is the creator of and outside of time. However, neither is God bound by his "eternal nowness" - that he is also capable of seeing the events of history as a succession of moments. In other words, he sees both perspectives perfectly.

    And that's a view I can live with. The problem I have with the eternal now theory is that many times it is presented that God is static, and it depicts him as almost a pantheistic god. Well, I don't believe God is static; I believe that he acts within time. And Webdog and others, I'm not saying you communicated this; I was mostly arguing against making God static.

    To sum it up, I think both sides are right in some aspects.
     
  2. webdog

    webdog Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,696
    Likes Received:
    2
    Did you not state the "literal" interpretation is "I shall be"? Tell me how "shall" has no tense! It's future tense. Why is YHWH translated "I AM", and not "I WILL"?
    Your definition of omnitemporal, and how you see it still holds God to the present...and holds Him within time. Replace "at" with "in" and you are correct.
    Yesterday at this time I was on the computer. The present was still the future to me. Having lived through the whole day, I know what happened throughout the day. If I were omnitemporal, I would foreknow what happened yesterday...because I experienced it, not because I had knowledge of what would happen, or because I made it so.

    I love this verse...
    Psalm 90:2 Before the mountains were brought forth, or ever you had formed the earth and the world, from everlasting to everlasting you are God.
     
    #182 webdog, Jul 20, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 20, 2006
Loading...