63% Now Say Massive Cut in Deficit is Goal Obama Least Likely to Achieve

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Revmitchell, Jun 4, 2009.

  1. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    38,332
    Likes Received:
    786
  2. OldRegular

    OldRegular
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Messages:
    22,678
    Likes Received:
    53
  3. donnA

    donnA
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2000
    Messages:
    23,354
    Likes Received:
    0
    according to obama it was never his goal, his goal was to run up the deficit, thats he said.
     
  4. Magnetic Poles

    Magnetic Poles
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2005
    Messages:
    10,407
    Likes Received:
    0
    Got a link to support this?
     
  5. LeBuick

    LeBuick
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2006
    Messages:
    11,537
    Likes Received:
    0
    Considering he took over in near depression times I don't find it fair to measure him by his ability to cut the deficit. I think it's enough if he can get us out of this recession and get people back to work.

    Reagan quadrupled the deficit and Bush didn't cut it any slack so I don't see why the GOP thinks Obama will be any different.

    I guess they have a different measuring stick when the Democrats are at the wheel.
     
  6. carpro

    carpro
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    20,911
    Likes Received:
    295
    I believe it is the goal he is most likely to achieve.

    If you look at the size of the deficit he has run up, massive cuts are possible and we will still be deficit spending.

    He is once again setting himself up to appear to succeed while actually failing.

    His adoring public won't notice.
     
  7. rbell

    rbell
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    11,103
    Likes Received:
    0
    Reagan led us in rebuilding our emasculated military and staring down a worldwide threat.

    Bush spent way too much money in domestic giveaways.

    Obama's busy taking our money, buying up our production and financial industries, and then telling them what to do.

    Anytime you feel like comparing apples to apples, feel free. It would be a welcome change.
     
  8. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    38,332
    Likes Received:
    786
    Obama apologists usually don't

    He was forced to spend on our military. When Obama leaves office, most likely after one term, the next Republican President will again have to do the same thing.

    No you don't.But it makes good political rhetoric doesn't it.
     
  9. Freedom

    Freedom
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    May 18, 2009
    Messages:
    217
    Likes Received:
    0
    It wasn't. His intention was to pull America and the rest of the world out of Bush's depression.
     
  10. Bro. Curtis

    Bro. Curtis
    Expand Collapse
    <img src =/curtis.gif>

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2001
    Messages:
    20,253
    Likes Received:
    4
    I guess we can call him a failure, then.
     
  11. LeBuick

    LeBuick
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2006
    Messages:
    11,537
    Likes Received:
    0
    Obama is rebuilding the Smokey ruins of the economy. So the difference is what, Reagan was republican and Obama is a democrat?
     
  12. rbell

    rbell
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    11,103
    Likes Received:
    0
    No, here's the difference, though you will ignore it:

    Reagan rebuilt the military. That means, tanks, ships, and missiles were constructed. Personnel was added. That kind of thing...not to mention, that task was Constitutional.

    Obama is simply printing money to spend it, and taking over businesses that aren't his Constitutional right to take over.

    In addition, we know that building and improving equipment, systems and enhancing personnel does make the military better. We're just being asked by King Obama to "trust him" that all this massive government spending, takeover, and rights erosion will "make our economy better." We have nothing to support that it will...and in fact, my contention is (and many agree) that this borrowing will have dire economic impact (dollar devaluation, massive hyperinflation, and the debt will eat up our GNP).

    So, in summary:

    Reagan: constitutional action; direct result...improvement.
    Obama: unconstitutional action; direct result...not known, but very likely catastrophic.

    I think my point is clear...but I'm quite sure on threads critical to Obama, you will continue to bring up Reagan.

    I know that you're profoundly disappointed to learn that I've actually thought this out. Sorry to be the bearer of bad news.
     
  13. Robert Snow

    Robert Snow
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2009
    Messages:
    4,466
    Likes Received:
    0
    Actually, President Obama has done very considering his length of time in office, but I don't expect the Obama-haters to call him anything except a failure.
     
  14. Bro. Curtis

    Bro. Curtis
    Expand Collapse
    <img src =/curtis.gif>

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2001
    Messages:
    20,253
    Likes Received:
    4
    :laugh:

    I don't expect the kool-aid drinkers to admit he's inept, inexperienced, and making things worse.

    Call me a hater, if you want. I wear it like a badge, Bob.
     
  15. carpro

    carpro
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    20,911
    Likes Received:
    295
    He's done unimaginable damage in his short term in office.

    More to come.

    Unfortunately.
     

Share This Page

Loading...