A KJVOist exposes Ruckman!

Discussion in '2005 Archive' started by David J, Feb 14, 2005.

  1. David J

    David J
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2004
    Messages:
    796
    Likes Received:
    0
  2. robycop3

    robycop3
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2000
    Messages:
    7,573
    Likes Received:
    10
    Dr. Hymers has his own brand of KJVO, just as false as any other. As for Dr. Herb Evans, he and his toady, "John Henry", refuse to engage in any meaningful discussion; they are standard KJVO party-liners who bring nothing new to the table.

    I have yet to see any modern church that claims to be "KJV 1611 Only" actually USE the AV 1611! That also applies to many a member of many a message board! To me, that shows those people are quite unlearned in the subject about which they're writing, or in some cases, outright LIARS.
     
  3. PastorSBC1303

    PastorSBC1303
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2003
    Messages:
    15,125
    Likes Received:
    0
    Roby, yep!
     
  4. Bluefalcon

    Bluefalcon
    Expand Collapse
    Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2004
    Messages:
    915
    Likes Received:
    4
    Calling people either one thing or "outright LIARS" sounds just like the bellicose language KJVO advocates use. Maybe Paul or Jesus would have done this, I'm not sure.....some of the harshest words were against those who were apparently on God's side but in reallty were not. But let our words be seasoned with salt. I of all men am guilty of violating this command all too often, and I regret doing so even on this board when the conversations get heated.

    Yours,

    Bluefalcon
     
  5. av1611jim

    av1611jim
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2002
    Messages:
    3,511
    Likes Received:
    0
    Bluefalcon; I agree. When one uses the very SAME terms he denounces in another person, I am led to believe that the critic has less credibility than the one he is criticizing.

    In HIS service;
    Jim
     
  6. robycop3

    robycop3
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2000
    Messages:
    7,573
    Likes Received:
    10
    BF & Jim:

    With all due respect, how else would you describe those who DELIBERATELY write or tell things that simply aren't true? There's a BIG DIFFERENCE in being accidentally mistaken, which every one of us is at one time or another, and being DELIBERATELY wrong.

    That's why I question the motives of those who say they're using the AV 1611 when their Scriptural quotes are clearly from another edition. Sometimes it's a mistake on their part because they think all KJV editions are the same, but there are those who KNOW BETTER(Not necessarily on this board) but continue to insist they're using the AV.
     
  7. David J

    David J
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2004
    Messages:
    796
    Likes Received:
    0
    What's really alarming is if Dr. Ruckman used a modern version KJVOist would have tons of info on web pages and books exposing Ruckman's heresies. As it stands right not we must look very hard in order to find a KJVO that will call Ruckman what he is without making excuses for Ruckman.

    My hats off to the KJVO people who truly stand up against Ruckman and don't make excuses because he is KJVO!
     
  8. Keith M

    Keith M
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2002
    Messages:
    2,024
    Likes Received:
    0
    Since most people in the KJVO camp really don't use the original 1611 KJV, doesn't it stand to reason that they are using modern versions?
    It's either one or the other...
     

Share This Page

Loading...