A poster here has managed to bring up the man of Geneva at the drop of a hat when no one has previously referenced him in given threads. What is up with that? I think it may be a sign of derangement. Of course he hates what is mythological. He is passionate about it. People on the other side of the aisle don't cite Arminius or Wesley even 5% of the time. Let's review some of his gems and try to get a picture of what drives him in his hatred of a myth. Remember, in these examples no one has hinted at anything regarding the man of Geneva. Please observe his lies and his insulting language as he obsesses. "You follow Calvin and not Christ or the Scriptures." "You all agree with another to blindly follow the philosophy of Calvin instead of Scripture. Pity!" "But you have put your faith in Calvin." "Too bad you have forsaken Christ for Calvin. I just don't understand your devotion to this man." "And still you defend your man Calvin. You should be ashamed of yourself." "One cannot insert 'Calvin' into the middle of the chapter without warrant." "Why don't you Cals simply believe the Bible instead of Calvin." "You blindly believe Calvin instead of Scripture." "Do you believe the Bible, or just everything Calvin tells you?" ___________________________________________________________ The above examples are indicative of this poster's mindset. An impartial observer would fairly conclude that the above samples are not evidencing Christianty. The BB has let him get away with his game for too long. Time for a change.