A Pre 1930's Defense of KJV

Your problem is that we(the Bible believer)have Church history on our side.As I stated before,Church history proves that Christians have been rejecting modern "bibles"(214 now) from inferior Papal mss.now for centuries;problem is,the "bibles" from those Popish mss. were Catholic "bibles",and were quickly rejected;now the post 1880 "bibles" are from the same mss. -but in a Protestant wrapper- and are still being rejected.


Granted that with media,internet,and other modern luxuries people can do more than people before could.But never the less,Church history shows that people back then(pre 1930's) knew a snake when they saw it,and the Bible believer still does today.. For the most part anyway.


So much for your "post 1930 KJBO" hoopla.. </font>[/QUOTE]AA, do me a favor and put down yur chick comic books long enough to take a real church history course!!

 

Since KJVO is such an important issue and statement of belief, We should expect to see it in a statement of faith of a pre-1930 church or denomination.

I have seen of late so many IFB churches post That they are KJVO, KJV, (or *God forbid*, they should lie and say they are 1611KJV without using the 1611) in their constitution, on their websites, on their stationary, and on any advertisements.

If KJVO was an accepted doctrine before 1930, there should be somewhere a Baptist statement of faith that existed before 1930 about it.

Does anyone know of one?

 

There have been KJVOs since 1611. I asked for PROOF that the KJVO myth was anything but an occasional objection by an occasional author before 1930, and so far all I've seen are some obscure articles mildly supporting the KJV. I haven't seen any of the current KJVO chants in anypre-1930 literature.

KJVO IS A MODERN MONSTER.

 

Now you are simply lying! You stated, without qualification, that KJVO began with SDA Wilkinson. That has been proven wrong, yet you continue to dissemble, dodge and weave to avoid admitting your unqualified statement was not only incorrect, but was an attempt at "guilt by association."

 

Now you are simply lying! You stated, without qualification, that KJVO began with SDA Wilkinson. That has been proven wrong, yet you continue to dissemble, dodge and weave to avoid admitting your unqualified statement was not only incorrect, but was an attempt at "guilt by association." </font>[/QUOTE]Sir...Politely as I can say it... I said, M-O-D-E-R-N KJVO in many posts. Ant while I acknowledge that there have been KJVOs since 1611, the present monster is a product of the 20th century. There was just a smattering here & there of lone authors writing some mild KJVO material in the preceding 300 years. There was none of this MVs deny Christ's deity in Luke 2 by calling Joseph Jesus' father" or other stupidity.

KJVO IS A MODERN MONSTER.