Many of you are King James only people based on the TR and the Masoretic text. That is certainly the most respectable of all of the KJVO positions in my opinion even though I do not agree. Here is my question: Two different translation committees gather and each produces their own translation. THey both use the exact same mss basis for their translation. they both use the same literal approach to the task. They both come up with very similar translations but they do differ slightly in places. Which one is the inerrant Word of God?