A Snopes fail on the Gruber fact-check

Discussion in 'News / Current Events' started by Revmitchell, Nov 14, 2014.

  1. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    38,378
    Likes Received:
    790
    Ever hear the story about how a popular urban-legend fact-check site posted a piece without checking easy-to-check facts?

    Hang on a second — don't bother looking this one up on Snopes.

    The story begins with a suddenly discovered YouTube video from an obscure academic panel discussion in 2013. In the video, health economist Jonathan Gruber, an architect of Obamacare, said that a “lack of transparency” and the “stupidity of the American voter” made it possible for Congress to pass the bill.

    Gruber clearly says this on tape, but Snopes. seems to think there might be more — or less — to this story.

    Gruber’s remarks at the 24th Annual Health Economics Conference hosted by the University of Pennsylvania were captured on a video that went largely unnoticed until the conservative activist group American Commitment noticed it and posted a shorter version that only included the clip of Gruber.

    “Lack of transparency is a huge political advantage,” Gruber said. “Call it the stupidity of the American voter or whatever. But basically, that was really, really critical to getting the thing to pass.”

    Shortly after the American Commitment video gained national attention, the University of Pennsylvania's Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics YouTube channel pulled down the video of the panel discussion on which he said it. This led to confusion over whether the school was intentionally trying to scrub its records. The entire 51-minute video was reposted to the institute's YouTube channel about an hour after an editor at the Washington Examiner noticed it had gone missing (although it could have been down longer than that) while making inquiries about the tape's provenance.

    Snopes set out to investigate: “ 'Obamacare architect’ Jonathan Gruber recently said Obamacare only passed due to the ‘stupidity’ of the American voter and a lack of ‘transparency,’ and video footage of his remarks was deleted from the Internet.”

    Rather than giving the claim what is easily a “true” rating, the fact checking group gives it a “mixture” rating.

    “It appears the comments made by Gruber entered the stream of social media hot topics due to a 9 November 2014 post on the website the Daily Signal, where it was framed as a ‘newly surfaced video,' ” the website reported. “The shorter version of the video was initially posted by the political action committee (PAC) American Commitment.”

    American Commitment, which is not a PAC, had also linked to the original video from UPenn from its own YouTube channel.

    Even so, the involvement of a conservative group was apparently enough for Snopes. to question claims that Gruber said what he clearly says on the tape. Snopes also writes that American Commitment’s Phil Kerpen is the source of claims that the University of Pennsylvania pulled the video — which is not exactly true because the video did go offline and was reposted Monday around 2 p.m. Eastern Time.

    Snopes fact-checkers seem unable to draw obvious conclusions about something as simple as reading a time stamp on YouTube


    http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/article/2556028/
     
  2. matt wade

    matt wade
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2009
    Messages:
    6,156
    Likes Received:
    76
    Reading the Snopes article (http://www.snopes.com/politics/medical/gruber.asp) shows that they gave it a "Mixture" rating, as follows:

    The deemed it TRUE that Gruber made the comments. They aren't disputing that at all. They rated UNDETERMINED on whether the video was deleted in an attempt to hide it. The result of the two is a MIXTURE rating.

    The article you posted is trying to made something out of nothing. This is the standard way Snopes operates and they haven't done anything special in this case.
     
  3. PreachTony

    PreachTony
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2014
    Messages:
    1,910
    Likes Received:
    0
    Isn't that standard for partisan politics, though? Take something that is mostly meaningless/incomprehensible to the vast majority of the people and try to blow it up into a conspiracy rivaling the JFK assassination, the Roswell alien landing, and the faked moon landing?
     
  4. InTheLight

    InTheLight
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2010
    Messages:
    16,266
    Likes Received:
    619
    When I read through Weinstein's Twitter feed yesterday I learned that the University of Pennsylvania pulled the video and then put it back up. The question is the motivation. Did they pull the video to cover it up? That is what Snopes is questioning, not what Gruber said on the tape.

    So this Washington Examiner article is in error.

    http://www.snopes.com/politics/medical/gruber.asp
     
  5. Use of Time

    Use of Time
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2014
    Messages:
    2,340
    Likes Received:
    101
    [Throws flag] Informal Fallacy on the offense. 15 yard penalty and a loss of down.
     
  6. matt wade

    matt wade
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2009
    Messages:
    6,156
    Likes Received:
    76
    I was hoping for a song and dance, or at least some snide remarks. Guess "The Reverend" knew this one was a lost cause.
     

Share This Page

Loading...