On another board, some not-too-bright KJVOs are advancing the argument that newer versions are part of the "Genesis 3; Yea, hath God said..." corruption. Let us see just how SILLY their argument is! First, they quote Genesis 2:16 "And the LORD God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat: Gen 2:17 But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die." Then they quoteGen 3:3 "But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die." Then they say Eve altered God's words, and man has been doing it ever since. BUT........... Can they *PROVE* Eve altered God's words to her? ABSOLUTELY NOT! First, Gen. 2:16-17 quotes God's words to ADAM before he made Eve. Second, God did NOT cite Eve for ALTERING His words, but for DISOBEYING them. therefore, we MUST assume Eve CORRECTLY quoted God's words to Sneaky Snake. I'm sure he also knew what God had said to her, and his "Yea, hath God said" was a rhetorical question. Remember, he did NOT try to alter God's words; he denied their VERACITY. Thus, common sense shows this KJVO argument to be utterly without merit, same as all their others.