1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

A.W. Pink On Election ...

Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by Rippon, Mar 1, 2006.

  1. Calvibaptist

    Calvibaptist New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2006
    Messages:
    892
    Likes Received:
    0
    Tim,
    My reasoning goes like this. The doctrinal portions of the Scriptures say that someone must be regenerated before they can respond to God. Therefore, if I see someone (anyone) in any time period, responding to God, they must be regenerate.

    The situation of Adam and Eve is a prime example of a story that says nothing about anything. It doesn't even really tell us they were saved. We assume it. If we are going to assume they "got saved" when God approached them and cursed the ground and killed the animals and made the clothes of skin, then I am going to assume that in order for them to respond properly to God, they were regenerate.
     
  2. Calvibaptist

    Calvibaptist New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2006
    Messages:
    892
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hey quickened1, I see you have as much trouble figuring out the quote-within-a-quote thing as I do! ;)

    Anyway, I disagree that Christ being "firstborn" has anything to do with time here. Mormons use the same argument to talk about Him being a created being because Colossians says He is the "firstborn over all creation." Firstborn has more to do with pre-eminence than time. If you use your line of reasoning, you have to follow it all the way through to the end of the verses in Rom. 8:29-30. No one in the OT would have been predestined. No one in the OT would have been called. No one in the OT would have been justified. No one in the OT would be glorified.
     
  3. Calvibaptist

    Calvibaptist New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2006
    Messages:
    892
    Likes Received:
    0
    Let me clarify my position here. Again, I can not speak for all calvinists. I know there are some calvinists (even on this board) who believe that the HS regenerates any time He wants to (which I agree with - see John 3:8) without any means whatsoever. I, however, believe that the HS regenerates any time He wants to through the means or agency of the Word.

    1 Peter 1:23 having been born again, not of corruptible seed but incorruptible, through the word of God which lives and abides forever.

    This would mean that I believe that when God spoke to Adam and Eve, the HS at that point regenerated them through the Word, and they responded appropriately.

    Isaiah 55:11 So shall My word be that goes forth from My mouth; It shall not return to Me void, But it shall accomplish what I please, And it shall prosper in the thing for which I sent it.

    Again, not all calvinists believe this way, but I do.
     
  4. quickened1

    quickened1 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2006
    Messages:
    55
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hey quickened1, I see you have as much trouble figuring out the quote-within-a-quote thing as I do! ;)

    Anyway, I disagree that Christ being "firstborn" has anything to do with time here. Mormons use the same argument to talk about Him being a created being because Colossians says He is the "firstborn over all creation." Firstborn has more to do with pre-eminence than time. If you use your line of reasoning, you have to follow it all the way through to the end of the verses in Rom. 8:29-30. No one in the OT would have been predestined. No one in the OT would have been called. No one in the OT would have been justified. No one in the OT would be glorified.
    </font>[/QUOTE]Hey There CalviBap.,

    Yeah I remember having to deal with Colossians 1:15 about 10 years ago. It wasn't a Mormon who was attacking Christ's deity but rather a JW. Anyway it makes sense to me that Christ would be the firstborn among many brethren. No one was concieved of the Holy Ghost but Jesus. Thus making him THE Son of God. The born again believer is regenerated by the Holy Spirit making him A son of God. Christ is said to be the HEAD of the body. Christ had no body for O.T. believers to be baptized into. I cant see the body of Christ being formed before he was born physically. I certianly agree Christ had pre-eminence.
    I do follow through with the reasoning. I dont believe people in the O.T. were saved the same way people are in the N.T. Im dispy and do my best to rightly divide.
     
  5. Me4Him

    Me4Him New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2004
    Messages:
    2,214
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think calvinist are getting the "Calling" mixed up with "regeneration", in saying we must be "regenerated" before we will hear/accept the "Call".

    If that was the case, the many who are called but not chosen would have to be "regenerated" to hear the call, then "un generated" :eek: to not be chosen.

    The "CALL" "ENABLES" us to respond, but the "Choice" is still our's to make, many called/few chosen, if we accept the "CALL", then and only then, are we "Regenerated".
     
  6. quickened1

    quickened1 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2006
    Messages:
    55
    Likes Received:
    0
    They have stated that we do have a choice. However because of mans depraved nature he will reject GOD every time. That wasn't the case in the O.T.
     
  7. quickened1

    quickened1 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2006
    Messages:
    55
    Likes Received:
    0
    (quickened1 said)
    They have stated that we do have a choice. However because of mans depraved nature he will reject GOD every time. That wasn't the case in the O.T.
    </font>[/QUOTE]I thank God computer skills are not nec. for salvation...haha!
     
Loading...