Abortion or Water Boarding, Which is Satanic?

Don't forget that it's never right to do wrong to do right.
If you go down the road of moral relativism, it gets very steep going downhill.

Regards,
BiR

 

And yet, Land and I have common ground with respect to torture, don't we? I didn't claim that Land was infallible - please stick to what I write, OldRegular.

Regards,
BiR

 

In other words, 86% of the released detainees have not returned to terrorism.

 

This just shows the danger to our country if these right-wing extremists ever get control of our government. Thank God for President Obama!

 

Or were never terrorists to begin with.

 

Yes, no doubt they were just sunning by the pool in Cancun when they were snatched.

 

Amazing isn't it?

 

Liberals have the remarkable gift of compartmentalization. Because we support waterboarding done by the government to protect citizens, we are therefore guilty of evil and torture in their minds.

BUT....

Just because they voted for the abortionist in chief, they do not support and are not guilty of murder and neither is he, even when it involves infanticide. It would funny if it wasn't such a terribly sad or crazy or reprobate way of thinking. :tonofbricks: No wonder the world is so messed up and the very elect will be deceived. I sigh in exasperation to the circular reasoning on this forum by some posts - let's give full constitutional rights to foreign warmongers but lets scrape our future citizens into pieces and give them no constitutional rights. It's just nuts.

 

That we know of. It only took 19 of them to kill thousands of our citizens. Personally, I would not have waterboarded, if I were in charge, and not the government - I would have killed them all, nuked Iraq and Afghanistan and let God sort them out. How about that? Which just goes to prove GW Bush is not right-wing and the waterboarding would never have been done or been necessary and we wouldn't be having this boring discussion if we had killed them all instead of just catching them and serving them their special meals each day on a sunny beach with salty sea breezes and providing them entertainment and basketball. We could have nuked all of these places from the air and never had a boot touch the ground. Just shows how foolish our leaders are in a touchy-feely political climate. And that there really is not a war on terror or we would have conducted it like a war and for our survival as a civilization. And nukes on Iraq and Afghanistan would have been a whole lot cheaper on taxpayers. :thumbsup:

 

Then let's try them and see the evidence. We have a presumption of innocence
in our system. Accusations are easy to make. Let the government give evidence to support such assertions.

 

Page 10 closing warning - this thread will be closed no sooner than midnight ET by one of the moderators. LE

 

Perhaps the government has evidence to support such assertions, but it is classified. You are too quick to judge our military and our intelligence community, MP.

Do you wish them to be treated as US citizens in an open court? Full discovery so intelligence documents become public information for the media? What sense does that make? What's the use of having classified information if it all is open for the world and our enemies to see? You would have never survived D-Day in WW2, MP.

 

In their mindset, yes, we are just talking about tissue blobs in that mindset, although they aren't allowed to say it on the BB because it is against the rules. :tear:

 

Can you really blame people for not believing the government about it's secrets LE? Wasn't too long ago that we found out that the Bush administration used bogus intell and forged documents to gain our consent to destroy a country we'd already been at war with for ten + years.

Doesn't do much to instill trust in the government when all the government will say is "trust us we're the government". (Especially when the government works for Wall Street at the expense of it's own people.)

 

We are an open society. When we start having secret trials or no trials, we become no different than our enemy. As for WWII, even the Nuremburg trials were held in the open.

 

Yes, but the allies had actual proof of Nazi attrocities. Seems to me that people with actual proof would show it in court and those without would opt for secret trials and indefinite detentions instead.

 

I already did OR you were too busy throwing spears at the liberal menace to notice any of the massive coruption in your own backyard apparently. :smilewinkgrin:

And keep up the good work the NWO must surely appreciate your many efforts to support one of their puppets at least.