"Abortion President"

"But the research is controversial because days-old embryos must be destroyed to obtain the cells. They typically are culled from fertility-clinic leftovers otherwise destined to be thrown away. "

So what would be a non-typical method of obtaining embryos for research?

The 1987 Amendment to the Infertility (Medical Procedures) Act (Vic) allows the creation of embryos specifically for research purposes, as long as the proposed experiment takes place within 24 hours.

 

It is preposterous to suggest this.........

it's obvious his first priority is to go after Rush Limbaugh :laugh:

 

So libbies....tell us how slaughtering unborn children is an economic stimulus?

 

You are the first person I have heard even suggest such a thing. You tell us.

 

So does it bother you that Obama has authorized tax dollars for abortions over seas?

Does it bother you that Obama favors the use of tax dollars to destroy human embryos in the name of "research"?

Does it bother you that Obama is in favor of forcing doctors to perform abortions even if it against their conscience?

Does it bother you to know that the law allows the creation of new embryos for the express purpose of destroying them in the name of "research"?

 

Where have you been?

Are you forgetting about Pelosi?


"Defending $200 million in a proposed economic stimulus package going to "family planning services," Pelosi told ABC's George Stephanopoulos that "family planning services reduce costs" to the state and to the federal government. Seeming to recognize the possibility of controversy, Stephanopoulos asked, "So no apologies for that?" Pelosi answered, "No apologies" (Transcript, ABC News, This Week, 1/25/09)."

"Planned Parenthood defended Pelosi and called the attempt to put money for "family planning" in the stimulus package a "commonsense solution" that would "invest in health care and get us out of this economic downturn." PPFA argued, "Every public dollar spent to provide family planning services generates $4.02 in Medicaid savings in the following year alone" (PPFA release, 1/27/09)."

http://www.nrlc.org/news_and_views/Feb09/nv020309.html

 

I don't see anything about abortion in those quotes.

Also, Nancy Pelosi doesn't speak for me.

 

I was trying to answer your question as to who suggested that slaughtering unborn children is an economic stimulus.

I have recreated the discussion below.

Do try to keep up.:saint:

BTW "family planning services" is abortion. That's what Planned Parenthood does best.

 

So! Speak for yourself. Do you support slaughtering unborn babies or not?

 

I will not readdress an issue I have adequately spoken on before.

 

Try to keep up yourself. Family planning services is contraceptives and education.

 

Then how about answering my question.

Does it bother you?

 

Are you caught in an endless loop? Reread my words you quoted.

 

Sorry guys, it won't work. I have adequately expressed my opinions here numerous times. Since that time, the board admins have decided to stifle any discussion of the pros and cons of abortion law. Therefore I will not be goaded into violating the rules to get thrown off the board. Nice try.

 

I am so mad you thought of that and said it before I could!:tongue3:

 

Folks, MP has stated before that he is against abortion.

That said -- MP, you know just as well as the rest of us that contraceptives and education are not the only "family planning" options offered by Planned Parenthood. Your answer in that regard was definitely in the "coy" category.

 

Planned Parenthood sees abortion as a form of birth control.It is a murderous organization that has no value.

 

Ironically----this is what the late Larry Burkett preached in his financial concept books and seminars-----------25 years ago!!!!!!