Gal. 1:8 But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed. 9 As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed. 1. No one on this board can honestly deny that Paul is speaking of a trivial non-essential matter. 2. No one on this board can honestly assert that the gospel of justification by faith without works is the same or similar to a gospel of justificaton by faith with works. 3. Therefore, it is not name calling, but is the absolute essential demand of Scriptures that either those preaching one of these gospel's is to be regarded as "Let him be" accursed and that is a very serious matter. 4. Neither can anyone logically deny that the Scriptures speak of only TWO POSSIBLE ways/gospels and they are in direct contradiction to each other in regard to both essence and consequences (Mt. 7:12-13; Rom. 11:6; Eph. 2:8-9). 5. Neither can anyone logically deny that the "accursed" gospel is the one that is inclusive of some kind of works as Romans 3-4 and Galatians 1-4 are all condemning that gospel which includes some manner of justification by works. This cannot be true of the only alternative as it is a gospel "without works." 6. The two different gospels, ways, justification are contrasted by the terms "grace" versus "works" and so the false gospel, false justification, false way necessarily is inclusive of works. Thus "saved by grace....not of works" and "worketh not but justifieth...without works" is the alternative of this contrast. Therefore, if there are only TWO possible ways, TWO possible gospels and justification by faith without works is contradictory to justificaiton by faith with works, and the accursed is the one that includes works - then it should be obvious which of the only two possible gospels is the accursed one.