ACLU limits 'free speech' by its board members

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Revmitchell, Sep 4, 2006.

  1. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    38,383
    Likes Received:
    790
    ACLU limits 'free speech' by its board members


    The American Civil Liberties Union is weighing new standards that would discourage its board members from publicly criticizing the organization's policies and internal administration.
    "Where an individual director disagrees with a board position on matters of civil liberties policy, the director should refrain from publicly highlighting the fact of such disagreement," the committee that compiled the standards wrote in its proposals.

    "Directors should remember that there is always a material prospect that public airing of the disagreement will affect the A.C.L.U. adversely in terms of public support and fund-raising," the proposals state.

    May 24, 2006, Wednesday
    By STEPHANIE STROM (NYT); National Desk
    Late Edition - Final, Section A, Page 20, Column 4, 1064 words

    http://www.sermonaudio.com/new_details.asp?ID=21637

    http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=FA061FF93B5A0C778EDDAC0894DE404482

    Libs against dissent when it is aginst them and what they want.
     
    #1 Revmitchell, Sep 4, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 4, 2006
  2. El_Guero

    El_Guero
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2004
    Messages:
    7,714
    Likes Received:
    0
    Liberals have always wanted two sets of laws . . . one for us - to control us, and another for them - so that they get freedom.
     
  3. faithgirl46

    faithgirl46
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2005
    Messages:
    2,778
    Likes Received:
    2
    So true.
    Faithgirl
     
  4. hill

    hill
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2006
    Messages:
    92
    Likes Received:
    0
    A perfectly logical maneuver on their part.
     
  5. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    38,383
    Likes Received:
    790
    But very hypocritical to be sure of.:thumbs:
     
  6. Daisy

    Daisy
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2003
    Messages:
    7,751
    Likes Received:
    0
    The article was in May - what was decided?
     
  7. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    38,383
    Likes Received:
    790
  8. Daisy

    Daisy
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2003
    Messages:
    7,751
    Likes Received:
    0
    Good - it really would have been too ironic, not to mention (although someone did) hypocritical.
    There are control freaks everywhere.
     
  9. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    38,383
    Likes Received:
    790
    Do not get me wrong. If any organization wants to keep its board meetings private I'm all for it. But since the ACLU is against it and goes to court to fight it when it comes to the government then it would be hypocritical.
     
  10. Daisy

    Daisy
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2003
    Messages:
    7,751
    Likes Received:
    0
    Even public organizations financed by your tax dollars?
    Yeah, I got that...
     
  11. StraightAndNarrow

    StraightAndNarrow
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2003
    Messages:
    2,508
    Likes Received:
    3

    I agree that is is inconsistent with the high standards of the ACLU. On the other hand, that is how Bush is running the government.
     
  12. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    38,383
    Likes Received:
    790

    Good for him!:thumbs:
     
  13. Magnetic Poles

    Magnetic Poles
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2005
    Messages:
    10,407
    Likes Received:
    0
    Good for him, good for Haliburton, bad for us.
     

Share This Page

Loading...