American Values Network Bashes Ayn Rand

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Paul3144, Jun 15, 2011.

  1. Paul3144

    Paul3144
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2009
    Messages:
    2,378
    Likes Received:
    0
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0TxCWbTqz9s

    I find it amazing that leaders on the Right pour laud and honor on Ayn Rand when her entire philosophy is against God, against the Church, and against religion. Ayn Rand was a sociopath who modeled her ideal man after serial killer William Hickman, who brutally murdered and dismembered a twelve year old girl.

    In fairness, I don't for a moment believe most conservatives are as radical as she was. There are many people who make good points on some issues while getting others wrong so it's not mere appreciation of some aspects of any one person's views that I object to. However, this video makes a very good point. Why do so many conservatives hold up Ayn Rand as a heroine when her stated life goal was to destroy God and the American way of life?

    Ayn Rand does show the true ethic of unfettered capitalism- a world devoid of love, empathy, joy, God, compassion, and morality.
     
  2. billwald

    billwald
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2000
    Messages:
    11,414
    Likes Received:
    0
    The amazing thing is that anyone can read through her stuff. She was NOT a good writer.
     
  3. Bro. Curtis

    Bro. Curtis
    Expand Collapse
    <img src =/curtis.gif>

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2001
    Messages:
    20,240
    Likes Received:
    2
    She would have been a fierce critic of the myriad of mideastern wars, Gitmo, rendition, the Patriot Act, and she wouldn't have shut up about it just because the one now doing it is black, like you and your ilk did.

    Your post is a piece of trash, nothing but a personal attack on your political betters, based on nothing but opinion, and the last sentence is especially shameful.
     
    #3 Bro. Curtis, Jun 15, 2011
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 15, 2011
  4. Bro. Curtis

    Bro. Curtis
    Expand Collapse
    <img src =/curtis.gif>

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2001
    Messages:
    20,240
    Likes Received:
    2
    This "admiration" for the man you describe is conjecture, based on private journal entries, never meant for anyone's eyes but her's. In those journals she herself dismisses her feelings as "idealizing". The entries have been distorted, and edited.

    Second, Ayn Rand's contempt for anyone who initiates force is consistent thru her entire life's work.

    You can disagree with her on philosophy specifics, but to call her a sociopath, and to say she "walks across bodies" is nothing but an immature, ill-informed, biased insult.

    In other words, just what we've come to expect from you, and your ilk.
     
  5. Paul3144

    Paul3144
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2009
    Messages:
    2,378
    Likes Received:
    0
    If you haven't noticed, I've been fairly critical of President Obama and have stated multiple times I might not vote for him in 2012.

    I regret your vexation and I'm sorry you feel that way. I'm attacking Ayn Rand's antichrist Objectivist philosophy. My last sentence is the truth about Randian unfettered capitalism. Ayn Rand said charity is not a virtue and that most people are not worthy of love and compassion. It's social Darwinism at its finest.

    All you have to do is read her books to see her idealization of sociopathic and schizoid traits.

    I never implied anything different. I'm referring to personality traits, not actions.

    I never said she "walks across bodies". It's not just the specifics of her philosophy that I disagree with. It's the entire godless basis of it. I reject Rand's views for the same reason I reject Marxism. As a Christian, I reject any philosophy which denies the existence of Almighty God. That doesn't mean Rand or Marx were wrong on every specific matter they addressed, it simply means their philosophies, on the whole, are wrong. Ayn Rand shows that by rejecting the existence of a Supreme Being, you lose all basis for morality.
     
  6. carpro

    carpro
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    20,894
    Likes Received:
    294
    Hmmm.

    I find it just as disconcerting that Obama is a marxist set on destroying our economic system, but it doesn't seem to bother the left.

    BTW Who is Ayn Rand?
     
  7. targus

    targus
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2008
    Messages:
    8,459
    Likes Received:
    0
    Unfettered capitalism ??? :laugh: :laugh::laugh:

    With all the regulations at the federal, state, county and city levels?

    With the EPA?

    With the IRS?

    Thanks for making my day. :smilewinkgrin:
     
  8. Bro. Curtis

    Bro. Curtis
    Expand Collapse
    <img src =/curtis.gif>

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2001
    Messages:
    20,240
    Likes Received:
    2
    "Might not vote for him" does not come close to the level of the personal attack you made on capitalists, or Ayn Rand. You make me laugh. I will waste no more time with you.
     
  9. Arbo

    Arbo
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2010
    Messages:
    3,942
    Likes Received:
    1
    Excuse me while I get the manure shovel.
     
  10. Paul3144

    Paul3144
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2009
    Messages:
    2,378
    Likes Received:
    0
  11. Arbo

    Arbo
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2010
    Messages:
    3,942
    Likes Received:
    1
  12. Paul3144

    Paul3144
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2009
    Messages:
    2,378
    Likes Received:
    0
    Do you have anything substantive to say or are you just going to fling insults?
     
  13. Arbo

    Arbo
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2010
    Messages:
    3,942
    Likes Received:
    1
    If you think those are insults, you have a thin skin.

    By the way, do you consider this substantive?
    " ...the true ethic of unfettered capitalism- a world devoid of love, empathy, joy, God, compassion, and morality."
     
  14. Arbo

    Arbo
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2010
    Messages:
    3,942
    Likes Received:
    1
    It really is difficult for some to take you on the left seriously when you come up with zingers like this.
     
  15. Paul3144

    Paul3144
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2009
    Messages:
    2,378
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yes. That's provable by Ayn Rand's own words- which you have yet to address.
     
  16. Arbo

    Arbo
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2010
    Messages:
    3,942
    Likes Received:
    1
    Simply because Ayn Rand says something doesn't make it so.

    In my opinion your statement is still a load of garbage. You claimed it is provable. I invite you to do so.
     
  17. dwmoeller1

    dwmoeller1
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2007
    Messages:
    1,155
    Likes Received:
    0
    Regardless of whether its true or not, the initial question is: Why would conservatives laud one who believed it was true? Regardless of whether or not it *is* true, Ayn Rand certainly believed it to be AND thought such a world was ideal. Why then would she be lauded by Christian conservatives? That is how I took the question in the OP. And its a valid one.
     
  18. Ivon Denosovich

    Ivon Denosovich
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2007
    Messages:
    1,276
    Likes Received:
    0
    Wrong. W.R.O.N.G. Ayn Rand's sole political philosophy was the doctrine of the Non-aggression principle which she derived from applying Aristotle's doctrine of the non-contradiction to the idea of individual liberty. Her political views did not allow for violence except for the case of self-defense.

    As to her atheism, you're right that she was irreligious. But it's entirely possible to compartmentalize one's view of a philosopher or philosophy. For instance, I can agree with Person 1 on issues A thru M and disagree with that very same someone on issues N thru Z. In fact, with politics being the art of compromise, such is exactly what happens when persons of conflicting interest hammer out agreements. For what it's worth, Christian conservatives aren't the only ones who do this and it's simply disingenuous to imply otherwise.
     
    #18 Ivon Denosovich, Jun 25, 2011
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 25, 2011
  19. dwmoeller1

    dwmoeller1
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2007
    Messages:
    1,155
    Likes Received:
    0
    1. I don't think anyone implied that Christian conservatives are the only ones who do this.
    2. Rand was more than irreligious, she was anti-religion. She wasn't simply lacking in religion, she was against religion. To her, religion was an evil.
    3. Most significantly, this anti-religion stance of hers is *integral* to her whole philosophy. Its not something that can be reasonably put in another compartment from here political philosophy.

    Now, yes, there may be some pragmatic goals (ie. less governmental control) that conservative Christians have in common with Rand's ideas, but that is a different thing than lauding her position or philosophy. The essence of her philosophy is in opposition to Christianity. Faith was no better to her than liberal policies.
     
  20. Bro. Curtis

    Bro. Curtis
    Expand Collapse
    <img src =/curtis.gif>

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2001
    Messages:
    20,240
    Likes Received:
    2
    Why not ?

    I certainly seperate Thomas Jefferson from his.
     

Share This Page

Loading...