An open question for President Bush...

It doesn't even sting coming from you.

Joseph Botwinick

 

It won't be Howard Dean, anyway. It'll be Hillary.

 

Oh, please, please, please no! Say it won't be so! No Hillary!

 

Hillary, Howard, Wesley, Pelosi,

What really is the difference?

They are all a part of the extreme radical fundamentalist left wing of the party. Can anyone here please name for me one ideological difference between Dean and Clark? Would some Democrat here please tell me what the big ideological difference is between the 9 dwarfs are that makes them watn to fight to the bitter end to get the nomination?

Joseph Botwinick

 

Hillary, Howard, Bush, Wesley, Pelosi.

All stand for massive spending, advancement of the homosexual agenda, socialized medicine, big government, and pretty much the status quo on abortion (3500+ dead babies per day).

Probably all would have favored purging Roy Moore for his stand for God, although Bush is the only one who has had the opportunity to prove it.

 

Sorry. I think I've pretty much answered the question from my point of view in an earlier post. Like I said, be careful about jumping to amend the Constitution.

 

Moore was thrown out because he lost the court case on the monument to the 10 commandments, and then refused to abide by the federal court ruling, in violation of his own oath to uphold the law.

 

"Pryor: Mr. Chief Justice? And your understanding is that the Federal court ordered that you could not acknowledge God; isn't that right?

Moore: Yes.

Pryor: And if you resume your duties as Chief Justice after this proceeding, you will continue to acknowledge God as you have testified that you would today ---

Moore: That's right.

Pryor: ---no matter what any other official says?

Moore: Absolutely. Without --- let me clarify that. Without an acknowledgment of God, I cannot do my duties. I must acknowledge God. It says so in the Constitution of Alabama. It says so in the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. It says so in everything I have read. So ---

Pryor: The only point I am trying to clarify, Mr. Chief Justice, is not why, but only that, in fact, if you do resume your duties as Chief Justice, you will continue to do that without regard to what any other official says; isn't that right?

Moore: Well, I'll do the same thing this Court did with starting of prayer; that's an acknowledgement of God. Now, we did the same say thing that justices do when they place their hand on the Bible and say, "So help me God." It's an acknowledgement of God. The Alabama Supreme Court opens with, "God save the State and this Honorable Court." It's an acknowledgement of God. In my opinions, which I have written many opinions, acknowledging God is the source --- a moral source of our law. I think you must.

Does everyone understand what Bill Pryor was saying? He was saying that in order for Chief Justice Moore to resume his duties, he must not acknowledge God. The posting of the Ten Commandments did not even come up. Roy Moore's "crime" was acknowledging God. For this, he was removed from the bench."

From: http://covenantnews.com/baldwin031118.htm