Featured Andre Carson to Intelligence Committee

Two words . . . Grover Norquist.

http://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/2014/03/04/grover-norquist-co-build-islamist-influence-in-gop/

 

The leftists have been apologizing for this country at least for the last 80 years. Obamme has simply raised it to a new lever, traveling around the world to dos o. This is just one more example by the leftists of their intent to destroy this Republic!

 

It's too bad that the GOP has no input on Pelosi's appointees and her timing of this could hardly be worse. Andre is a convert to Islam who just won his election on name recognition only. His mother was no better.

 

I would think a background check would be required to serve on the Intelligence Committee.

 

...And an I.Q. test.

 

That would help!

 

Is this the guy who said "U.S. public schools should be patterned after islamic schools"?

 

Very interesting Poncho. I have complained to my Congressional Representatives for signing Norquist's "no tax hike pledge". Not because I favor higher taxes but because Congress is to represent the people not some DC sponge.

However, I was not aware of Norquist's ties to Islam. If the American people don't wake up we will be in the same shape as Europe or worse.

While in the Navy {Korean Police Action} I had opportunity to visit North Africa. The Muslims hated America then and they still do!

 

The behavior of some American converts to Islam reminds me of a passage of Scripture:

Matthew 23:15. Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves.

Some American converts to Islam seem to fit the remarks of Jesus Christ to the Pharisees:

and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves.

Perhaps Norquiest fits that pattern!

 

On top of that we have this . . . http://www.baptistboard.com/showthread.php?t=97628

It appears that the democrats and republicans both benefit from a cozy and profitable relationship with the Muslim Brotherhood and Islamic regimes.

 

No Poncho didn't flip flop on Frank Gaffney.

Even neocons can get some things right. Jerome Corsi and Joseph Farrah (World Net Daily) are neocons to but they still manage to get a few things right. Like securing the borders.

It's the incessant fear mongering and the endless calls to intervene in and control other nation's political processes and resources by coercion or military force that makes one a neoconservative.

Frank Gaffney is a prime example of neoconservatism. He just happened to be right about Norquist.

Where does this strange notion that a person automatically agrees with everything his source says or does come from? You use sources from the "liberal" media all the time does that mean you agree with everything they say and do?

 

Reagan was neoconned and the "official" definition of neoconservatism no longer applies. Neocons are Wilsonian progressives at heart who believe in telling "noble lies" and have no qualms about spending billions of dollars destroying then spending trillions to rebuild sovereign nations to "make the world safe for democracy" at the tax payer's expense.

So far all their best laid regime change and nation building plans have turned into epic failures and made the world a more chaotic, volatile, hostile and dangerous place. Their "pre emptive" regime change and nation building policy has increased the threat of terrorism by creating more terrorists and then they tell us the way to defeat the terrorists they created is to live in fear and give up our liberties and keep funding and arming the terrorists so they can be used in even more regime change and nation building follies.

Neocons are INSANE!

It's all about what the evidence shows. I have my doubts whether you understand that concept considering you continued to make the allegation that Russia invaded Ukraine after it was shown to you multiple times there is no evidence of any Russian invasion into Ukraine.

Actually I am the one who has been telling everyone here that Al Qaeda and ISIS are the love children of Washington's regime change policy of funding and arming radical Islamist groups and using them as proxy fighters which started during the Eisenhower administration and continued in Afghanistan under Reagan and continues today under Obama with full bipartisan support from the GOP.

SEE THIS.

Besides Lady Eagle and I both warned y'all about Grover Norquist and his ties to Islam years ago. Evidently you were either to busy looking for a democrat to blame and demonize, sleeping or surrendering my constitutional protections so you could feel a little safer to notice.

I prefer to point out how both sides are guilty of helping to create and sustain radical Islamic groups and using them as proxy fighting forces in their bloody regime change efforts. Rather than trying to blame then demonize one person or party for it.

You just don't like it because I won't close my eyes and give the GOP a pass. But why won't I give the GOP a pass you ask? It's really very simple, it's because the GOP is just as guilty as the democrats.

And there should be a number of others who go to jail for it but because of their status as politicians and highfalutin Washington lobbyists the laws that forbid you and I from supporting terrorist organizations doesn't seem to apply to them.

Again I ask . . . Where does this strange notion that a person automatically agrees with everything his source says or does come from?