Andrew Fuller

Discussion in 'Calvinism/Arminianism Debate' started by robt.k.fall, Jun 13, 2014.

  1. robt.k.fall

    robt.k.fall
    Expand Collapse
    Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2010
    Messages:
    116
    Likes Received:
    0
    Here's a link to Part 1 of a seven part series. I recommend reading all seven before posting any comments.
     
    #1 robt.k.fall, Jun 13, 2014
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 13, 2014
  2. Earth Wind and Fire

    Earth Wind and Fire
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2010
    Messages:
    18,915
    Likes Received:
    94
    Would be nice to have the link..
     
  3. RLBosley

    RLBosley
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2012
    Messages:
    1,752
    Likes Received:
    0
  4. kyredneck

    kyredneck
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2009
    Messages:
    10,548
    Likes Received:
    273
    Thanks.

    I've browsed over that seven part series of articles on Fuller, a couple excerpts:

    From part 2:
    “….a regrettable misunderstanding not only of Fuller but of the historic Calvinistic doctrine and is at the root of many bypasses in the discussion between these hopefully fraternal parties in Southern Baptist life.”


    From Part 3:
    “…if Fuller is to serve as a bridge from Calvinism to non-Calvinism all parties must still anticipate the meeting on this bridge.”


    From part 4:
    “….Fuller’s view of atonement in its relation to redemption, therefore, does not modify historical Calvinism, but places him within the context of an ongoing discussion of this issue among Calvinists. This is an area in which vigorous exchanges and hefty reasoning must be welcomed; these, however, operate within the commitments to unconditional election, sinful depravity that involves the moral inability of the will, the sovereign grace of effectual calling, the divine determination to save all the elect, and God’s status as a just moral governor. If non-Calvinists suppose Fuller is a way out of Calvinism for Baptists, others might justly contend that he is a way in….”


    It appears that Fuller represents a 'happy medium ground' of compromise to some in order to avoid a nasty rift that may or may not be imminent.

    I've probably forgotten more about him than I now know. He had Particular Baptist roots, but turned against and said/wrote many bad things about them later in his life, John Gill being one of his targets.
     
    #4 kyredneck, Jun 13, 2014
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 13, 2014
  5. Van

    Van
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2011
    Messages:
    9,515
    Likes Received:
    49
    With just a quick read through the second article addressing total spiritual inability, his bogus view remains within the realm of Calvinist dogma. Thus he seems a bridge to nowhere.
     
  6. robt.k.fall

    robt.k.fall
    Expand Collapse
    Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2010
    Messages:
    116
    Likes Received:
    0
  7. kyredneck

    kyredneck
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2009
    Messages:
    10,548
    Likes Received:
    273
    R.k.f., do you intend to provide comment on the articles? Or comment on comment on the articles?
     
  8. robt.k.fall

    robt.k.fall
    Expand Collapse
    Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2010
    Messages:
    116
    Likes Received:
    0
    Van, Fuller's POV was the starting point for William Carey and was a break from Gillite ridigity on the matter of foreign missions.

     
  9. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    17,023
    Likes Received:
    47
    he stands as the mediator between Hyper Cals, who tended to save God election precluding ANY need to evangelize/witness, as they were already reconciled back to God, and to those whose position is just aprofessing faith is good enough to save!
     
  10. Van

    Van
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2011
    Messages:
    9,515
    Likes Received:
    49
    Thanks Robt.K.Fall, that puts Fuller as a bridge between HyperCal, and Mainline Cal.
     
  11. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    17,023
    Likes Received:
    47
    Which would be one who holds to the Gospel saving a definite group of people, and yet the need to evangelize!
     
  12. Van

    Van
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2011
    Messages:
    9,515
    Likes Received:
    49
    Why evangelize. Could an elect person go to Hades/Gehenna if they say died before hearing the gospel? Since, according to Calvinism, God will save all the elect, what does preaching the gospel accomplish? Is it only to earn rewards for service? Are you saying something we choose to do might alter the outcome of anyone's life? I thought you were an exhaustive determinist, where everything, is predestined by God and nothing we do alters His predestined outcome. So if we think we choose not to evangelize, that was really the choice predestined by God and he has an alternate plan to reach anyone we might have impacted.
     
    #12 Van, Jun 13, 2014
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 13, 2014
  13. kyredneck

    kyredneck
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2009
    Messages:
    10,548
    Likes Received:
    273
    Why, it's the instrument God gave the Church to populate heaven with!! Everybody knows that!! Untold kajillions of souls went to hell because the Church was so late in finally developing organized mission boards. Thank God for men like Carey and Fuller who put her on the right track.
     
  14. Van

    Van
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2011
    Messages:
    9,515
    Likes Received:
    49
    I do not disagree, Kyredneck, but your view deviates from Calvinism, especially hyper-Calvinism.
     
  15. kyredneck

    kyredneck
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2009
    Messages:
    10,548
    Likes Received:
    273
    It's not my view, at all. I was being facetious in order to make a point.
     
  16. RLBosley

    RLBosley
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2012
    Messages:
    1,752
    Likes Received:
    0
    LOL 10chars
     
  17. Van

    Van
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2011
    Messages:
    9,515
    Likes Received:
    49
    Did you ever read where Jesus taught us that our yes should mean yes and our no should mean no. I should have discerned you were over the top, but alas, I am far too trusting when reading Calvinist posts.

    If your point is God saves each and every elect person, and nothing we do affects that outcome, then evangelism seems to have merit only in rewards for service.
     
  18. kyredneck

    kyredneck
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2009
    Messages:
    10,548
    Likes Received:
    273
    Such drama. Oh you poor dear, I've probably marked you and have caused you to be against Calvinists for life. Shame, shame on me....

    [sarcasm/facetiousness alert]
     
    #18 kyredneck, Jun 13, 2014
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 13, 2014
  19. robt.k.fall

    robt.k.fall
    Expand Collapse
    Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2010
    Messages:
    116
    Likes Received:
    0
    To the best of my knowledge, what is now considered the Mainline.
     
  20. robt.k.fall

    robt.k.fall
    Expand Collapse
    Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2010
    Messages:
    116
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yes, once I've read them all.
     

Share This Page

Loading...