Any Verse For Verse Bible Believers?

Tonytony, I honestly have no idea what your post is about. Your language is difficult to understand.

 

Tonytony, from your profile, your statement of salvation is confusing, so if that happens to be confusing (grace + repentance = Heaven) I'm afraid everything else will be too. In plain terms what are you trying to say?

 

Wow...my first experience on the BB with speaking in tongues!

Could someone interpret Tony's post for me?

 

Get it?

 

I get it! He's saying that if you don't do/believe everything like he does (no jewelry, anti-intellectualism, etc.), and if you have trouble understanding the Pauline epistles (and apparently if you have trouble understanding him, too), then you're not a true Bible believer.

That was tough. Trollese is hard to understand sometimes.

 

Tonytony: //Rebuke offend you or are you a bible believer?//

The rebuke wasn't understood, so it couldn't
possibly offend. This question contains the
logical error called: False Dilemma.
Di is a prefix meaning 'two'; 'lemma' means
a 'logical statement' (aka /also known as/:
'logical argument'). A 'Dilemma' is a
two statements which cover all cases
and are hard to figure which is true..
A 'False Dilemma is two
statements which really aren't the only two
choices.

Tonytony: // God's people can test out each other with the book anywhere and indentify each other. //

That is exactly so. By the Holy Spirit (and reading
their posts on the Baptist board) and using
Biblical tests, I detect
the following people who have posted on this
topic to be my Brothers & Sisters in Christ:

Amy.G the Baptist
D28Guy the Non-Denominational\Baptist
Dr. DQuixote the Non-Denominational\Baptist
donnA the Baptist
Eliyahu of the Plymouth Brethren
Rbell the Baptist
Snitzelhoff the Christian/Baptist
Webdog the Baptist

One cannot effectively rebuke other people unless:

1. one is in authority over the other

2. one speaks the language of the other
2a. There is a difference between
'your' and 'you're'
2b. Most English sentences are if two types:
- subject/verb - subject/verb/object

3. one has information

4. one communicates with the other;
communication requires to willing participants
(these people REALLY are having a hard
time filtering out the noise and receiving
the message, if any)

5. one must not do TROLL things

 

Don't feed the trolls.


I'm very tempted, but I'll pass on this one.


Soli Deo Gloria,
Dustin

 

1 Corinthians 1:24-25 (Geneva Bible, 1587 Edition):
But vnto them which are called,
both of the Iewes and Grecians,
we preach Christ, the power of God,
and the wisedome of God.
25 For the foolishnesse of God
is wiser then men, and the weakenesse
of God is stronger then men.

Be careful you don't read your Bible like this:

the foolishnesse of ME
is wiser then men, and the weakenesse
of ME is stronger then men.

It is a sin to ADD to the Word of God
(not to mention arrogant to replace 'GOD' with 'ME')

If one checks around the Baptist Board (BB)
one will find the following writing of mine
(you do know how to use Google to
search only the BB yes?)

---------------------------------------
The fundamentals of traditional fundamentalism:

1. the inspiration and infallibility of scripture
2. the deity of Christ (including His virgin birth)
3. the substitutionary atonement of Christ's death
4. the literal resurrection of Christ from the dead
5. the literal return of Christ in the Second Advent

The hyper-fundamentals:

1. Anti-Bible (KJBO = King James Bible Only)
2. Anti-education (AKA: pro-ignorance)
3. Anti-success
4. Anti-female
5. Anti-alien (Hate of gay-boys, racism, etc.)

Typical statements made by the hyper-fundamentalists:
(note that the world calls them "fundies"
and we real fundamentalists have to bear their
burden unjustly):

1. The KJB replaces the original language manuscripts as being God's word
2. Calling "seminary": "cemetery"
3. Jerry Falwell sold out to the Devil
4. mistreatment of women
5. Jews killed Christ
---------------------------------------

 

I guess that plain speaking and "getting-to-the-point" isn't one of tonytony's gifts.

 

:laugh:

BTW, tonytony, I believe every verse

 

Romans 10:9 (Western Apache):
Nize'di', Jesus sheBikehn hoshdlaa,
nniiyugo, la'iiBik'ehgo'ihinan Jesus daztsaadi'
nayihilna'ii nijii yune' hondlaayugo hasdannah doleel.

(Western Apache has three different 'a' based symbols
two of which are not distinguishable in the internet
character set. So I've use the same 'a' symbol
for all three.)

This is a part of 'all scripture'.
Is this part of all scripture profitable for you?

2 Timothy 3:16-17 (KJV1611 Edtion):
All Scripture is giuen by inspiration
of God, & is profitable for doctrine, for reproofe,
for correction, for instrution in righteousnesse,
17 That the man of God may be perfect,
throughly furnished vnto all good workes.

I find this scripture frequently misunderstood.
'Perfect' here is sometimes construed to mean
'without flaw' as indeed it mean in the early 20th
century and still does today. But in 1611 and in
the Greek from which this translation is based:
'perfect' refers to 'complete'. In fact, the Bible frequently
defining itself, shows here that 'perfect' means 'throughly
furnished' (and not 'without flaw').

 

My reaction:

1 Timothy 2:9-14 I believe women should dress modestly
Romans 7:2-3 We are free from the law and united to Christ
2 Timothy 3:16 I believe all scripture is God breathed
2 Peter 1:20-21 All prophecy came from God not man
2 Corinthians 6:14-17 We not to be friends with the world

Is this what you're looking for?

 

Amen, Brother Webdog -- you are so Right ON! :thumbs:


Tonytony: // God's people can test out each other with the book anywhere and indentify each other. //

said earlier by Ed:

May God's best blessings flow unto these mentioned,
children of the Living God. May God also bless
their families and thier ministrys. Amen.

 

Add Ed Edwards to that list! :thumbs:

 

Thank you sister.

Jesus said: John 5:31 (KJV1611 Edition):
If I beare witnesse of my selfe,
my witnesse is not true.

Needless to say, I believe what Jesus said.

 

Rom 7:2-3 (KJV1611 Edition):
For the woman which hath an husbaud,
is bound by the law to her husband,
so long as he liueth: but if the husband be dead,
she is loosed from the law of the husband.
3 So then if while her husband liueth,
shee be married to another man,
shee shalbe called an adulteresse:
but if her husband be dead,
shee is free from that law,
so that she is no adulteresse,
though she be married to another man.

This scripture does not speak of a Deacon
and remarriage. So judge this man:

I was saved by Jesus in April 1952. I was ordained
as a Baptist Deacon (same church I attend today) in
1979. In 1999 my first wife (the pianist in my church)
died of liver cancer. In 2002 I married my second wife
(the organist in my church). I've been judged by some
as a adulterer. How do you judge me and by what
scripture? (Recall that you will be judged the same
way you judge me - if the circumstances are the same).

 

Ed, why on earth would anyone judge you as an adulterer?
Is it because you're a male and the scripture is speaking about widows?
Do some think a widower is not free to remarry?

 

There was a poster on this BB (Baptist Board) /she was later
dismissed/ who said if one spouse died and the second
spouse remaried - that was adultry. So somebody is out
there teaching it. I know my church doesn't - i'm still
an active deacon (though I didn't do any active deaconing
when I didn't have 'one wife')