Anybody have a fresh argument...

Discussion in '2004 Archive' started by NaasPreacher (C4K), Aug 19, 2004.

  1. NaasPreacher (C4K)

    NaasPreacher (C4K)
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    26,806
    Likes Received:
    78
    on the KJVO issue?

    95% of our threads are samo-samo.

    Anything new for the "debate"?
     
  2. rsr

    rsr
    Expand Collapse
    <b> 7,000 posts club</b>
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2001
    Messages:
    10,071
    Likes Received:
    101
    I haven't heard the argument for a while that the KJV is correct because it was translated under a "king" as opposed to a "queen."
     
  3. Bro.Bill

    Bro.Bill
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2004
    Messages:
    268
    Likes Received:
    0
    C4K I agree with you, most of this is rehashed over and over again. What is frustrating is many hard feelings are built up with very little fruit bearing.The KJV issue is very devisive.
     
  4. NaasPreacher (C4K)

    NaasPreacher (C4K)
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    26,806
    Likes Received:
    78
    Rom 14:13 Let us not therefore judge one another any more: but judge this rather, that no man put a stumblingblock or an occasion to fall in his brother's way.
    Rom 14:19 Let us therefore follow after the things which make for peace, and things wherewith one may edify another.

    That sounds pretty simple, huh?
     
  5. Bro.Bill

    Bro.Bill
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2004
    Messages:
    268
    Likes Received:
    0
  6. Dr. Bob

    Dr. Bob
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2000
    Messages:
    29,402
    Likes Received:
    12
    I am still scratching my head over fundamental baptists who hate EVERYTHING about the Anglican church and belief and religion and practice, yet have accepted the Anglican Version of the Bible as being the "only perfect" one.

    This simply does not compute. Have we debated this incongruity?
     
  7. Dr. Bob

    Dr. Bob
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2000
    Messages:
    29,402
    Likes Received:
    12
    Oh, and I just started a thread on "Can a KJVonly Go to HEaven".

    Thought that would add some sweet spirit to the debate. They seem to think that those who hear the Gospel from MV or men like Wescott are in HELL because they didn't use the Anglican Version, so I'm beginning to wonder about THEIR salvation . . .
     
  8. Cix

    Cix
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2004
    Messages:
    129
    Likes Received:
    0
    What about all the people in the world who don't read English? Are thier souls forever doomed to Hell because they can't read the true word of God?
     
  9. Ransom

    Ransom
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2000
    Messages:
    4,132
    Likes Received:
    0
    rsr said:

    it was translated under a "king" as opposed to a "queen."

    Even that's doubtful.
     
  10. HankD

    HankD
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2001
    Messages:
    15,118
    Likes Received:
    319
    How about this one for the KJVO folks:

    Since the AV1611 First Edition is printed with old Gothic Font, can a person be saved while reading the AV1769 printed with the Roman Font?


    HankD
     
  11. Dr. Bob

    Dr. Bob
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2000
    Messages:
    29,402
    Likes Received:
    12
    ROMAN Font? Like Rome as in Latin and Codex Vatincanus? Nothing good can come out of Rome!

    Except maybe I John 5:7 or Rev 22 where there was not a Greek manuscript . .
     
  12. Trotter

    Trotter
    Expand Collapse
    <img src =/6412.jpg>

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2003
    Messages:
    4,815
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yo, Roger, Bob,

    Ain't ya'll learned nuthin' yet? Don't matter what you start out debatin', as soon as Meeshell or Azjo or Auntie-Alexander shows up, it all goes to pot anyways?

    If only the KJVO's would come up with new material, instead of recycling the same old garbage...

    Like they say, wish in one hand...

    In Christ,
    Trotter
     
  13. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards
    Expand Collapse
    <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    You may have something!

    Remember when we used to sing this
    in church?

    Come thou Font :eek: of every Blessing
    Tune my heart to sing Thy Grace
    Streams of Mercy never ceasing
    Call for Songs of loudest Praise.
     
  14. DeclareHim

    DeclareHim
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2004
    Messages:
    1,062
    Likes Received:
    0
    Amen [​IMG] every KJVO I know believes the Anglican Church is evil but yet they use there translation. Also the KJV originally contained the Apocrypha which all KJVO I know reject as cannon yet they love their Bible. :confused: [​IMG]
     
  15. David J

    David J
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2004
    Messages:
    796
    Likes Received:
    0
    I wonder if we have any true AV1611KJVOist hangig around! Now a true AV1611KJVO might be fun to debate since the KJVOist form of Ex Cathreda could easily be applied to 1611! Now that would be a new spin for the KJVO Camp! Imagine a AV1611KJVO telling a 1762/1769KJVO to put away their perverted KJV's.

    Just my thoughts...
     
  16. HankD

    HankD
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2001
    Messages:
    15,118
    Likes Received:
    319
    It's already happened.

    Don't know whether to laugh or cry.

    HankD
     
  17. David J

    David J
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2004
    Messages:
    796
    Likes Received:
    0
    Where? I would love to read it!
     
  18. TomVols

    TomVols
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2000
    Messages:
    11,170
    Likes Received:
    0
    No, we're only getting the same old retreads, which makes me wonder (as I have my entire tenure on this Board) if this entire forum shouldn't be eliminated.
     
  19. HankD

    HankD
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2001
    Messages:
    15,118
    Likes Received:
    319
    I'll try to find it again.

    It was a church with a website which said the the 1769 KJV Oxford Edition was the "resurrected" Word of God.

    HankD
     
  20. michelle

    michelle
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2003
    Messages:
    3,217
    Likes Received:
    0
    If I had to choose between the two:

    resurrected = by the power and providence of God Almighty, who is the only one who is able to resurrect perfectly

    or

    reconstructed = by the power and providence of man who has no ability to bring something back to life perfectly


    I would go with "resurrected" any day. However, I don't believe in either. I believe the faithful have always had God's perfect word, and will always have it, so there is no need for either of these. No need to resurrect or reconstruct something that was never dead, nor lost.


    Love in Jesus Christ our Lord and Saviour,
    michelle
     

Share This Page

Loading...