Appoint a Muslium:

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Salty, May 22, 2011.

  1. Salty

    Salty
    Expand Collapse
    20,000 Posts Club
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    22,065
    Likes Received:
    214
  2. preachinjesus

    preachinjesus
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2004
    Messages:
    7,406
    Likes Received:
    99
    Another brilliant misstep by the Republican field. I know plenty of qualified Muslims who are good citizens and benefit any organization they are part of in the community.

    There should be no litmus test of belief for ability to serve in a national office.
     
  3. Walguy

    Walguy
    Expand Collapse
    Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2002
    Messages:
    525
    Likes Received:
    1
    I don't know if he had the potential to be a really viable candidate anyway, but if he did, he doesn't anymore. I agree with him about the Sharia law thing, but you can't make a blanket statement like that about all Muslims. Not without sounding bigoted and ridiculous anyway, which is more than enough to sink any Republican candidacy.
     
  4. Salty

    Salty
    Expand Collapse
    20,000 Posts Club
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    22,065
    Likes Received:
    214
    You may be technically correct, but in this day and age a lot of folks may tend to agree with him - and thus guarantee him many votes.

    True - religion should not make a difference, but there is a lot of mistrust.
     
  5. billwald

    billwald
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2000
    Messages:
    11,414
    Likes Received:
    0
    The new national ID cards going to list one's religion? Will "666" be specified for people who decline to name their religion?
     
  6. Winman

    Winman
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2009
    Messages:
    14,768
    Likes Received:
    0
    But religion does make a difference, which many people in Europe are learning today.

    Christians generally believe in freedom of religion, but many (not all) Muslims do not. They think it is their duty to impose their religion on everyone.

    So, as Christians we have a problem. We want to give the Muslims freedom to worship as they chose, but they chose (not all, but many) to take away our religious freedom.

    At present this is not a big problem, but will be so in the future. I read recently that in Europe the Christian Europeans have a birth rate under 2.0 which means they are decreasing, while the Muslims in Europe have a birth rate over 8.0. This means in a few short years Muslims will become the majority and thus be able to vote themselves (and their laws) into power. They could very well prohibit freedom of religion and many other freedoms as well.

    It's nice to be fair, we should try to be fair, but you have to consider that the other side may not be.
     
  7. InTheLight

    InTheLight
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2010
    Messages:
    16,169
    Likes Received:
    610
  8. matt wade

    matt wade
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2009
    Messages:
    6,156
    Likes Received:
    76
    Does Saudi Arabia appoint a Christian ambassador to come to the US? How about a Jewish one to send to Israel?
     
  9. InTheLight

    InTheLight
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2010
    Messages:
    16,169
    Likes Received:
    610
    What a silly argument. Saudi Arabia is a kingdom, run by a family. Of course they're not going to appoint a Christian to be an ambassador.

    You're going back in my killfile.
     
  10. NaasPreacher (C4K)

    NaasPreacher (C4K)
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    26,806
    Likes Received:
    78
    Do we really want Saudi Arabia as our example?
     
  11. matt wade

    matt wade
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2009
    Messages:
    6,156
    Likes Received:
    76
    Thanks for the useful and thoughtful debate.
     
  12. matt wade

    matt wade
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2009
    Messages:
    6,156
    Likes Received:
    76
    Of course not, but we shouldn't have to kowtow to other countries and appoint ambassadors based upon their religion. Did we appoint atheists to the USSR? How about a Nazi to Hitler's Germany?
     
  13. NaasPreacher (C4K)

    NaasPreacher (C4K)
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    26,806
    Likes Received:
    78
    I have no problem with us reasonably trying to show respect to other nations. We are above their pettiness.

    Beside, who better to represent us to a culture than who who knows how to function in that culture.
     
  14. InTheLight

    InTheLight
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2010
    Messages:
    16,169
    Likes Received:
    610
    Appointing people of that ideology would be pandering. Besides, atheism is not a religion. Nazism is not a religion. Neither are they nationalities or races.

    Diplomacy is the art of tactfulness and mutual respect. When you say, "we shouldn't have to kowtow to other countries" you are exposing your lack of understanding in this area.

    Good bye.
     
  15. go2church

    go2church
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2002
    Messages:
    4,304
    Likes Received:
    6
    So he thinks there should be a litmus test of religion before you serve? If that is the case, I could not, would not, will not vote for him.
     

Share This Page

Loading...