Are some Baptists "historic revisionists " ?

Discussion in 'History Forum' started by lakeside, May 14, 2015.

  1. lakeside

    lakeside
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2011
    Messages:
    826
    Likes Received:
    0
    There are a few Baptists on this BB that make this claim: That they insist that they are not Protestants, as they "aren't protesting anything", that their church goes back "to the beginning." Obviously there is no historical proof of this (because it's not true!). My feeling is that they claim this b/c to admit to being Protestant means admitting that prior to the 16th Century, all of Christianity was Catholic, therefore Catholics must be Christians (which they deny-we're idol worshippers-deceived by the Church into being idol worshippers, but idol worshippers nonetheless, and we aren't "saved", as we worship Mary and don't consider Christ our "personal Lord and Savior"), an idea they find abhorrent.

    I've used Scripture, Church History, reason, everything I can think of, nothing works. They continually point to their husbands, wifes, cousins, great grandchildren and the many other former Catholics who read the Bible, for the very first time, apparently (what parish did they go to where they never heard the Bible b/f?), realized that the Church "deceived" them, "got saved" and are now Baptist. I just continue to pray that they will see the light some day (I realize it may be when they're in purgatory, but oh well).
     
  2. McCree79

    McCree79
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2015
    Messages:
    1,128
    Likes Received:
    33
    I have no issue with acknowledging that in the 16th century a lot of people woke up and left the RCC. The reformers are responsible for restoring a lot of biblical principles. So were the Anabaptists. It took both groups some growing pains to work through the bible and for solid doctrine throughout the ranks. You present the Catholic Church like it was the only Christian church before the reformation. The Catholic church was never the only "denomination" and has never been the "universal" church. Calling yourself something doesn't make it so. You can't be the universal church if their is other churches. There was never theological harmony throughout Christianity. Corinth and Ephesus are prove of that.
     
  3. blessedwife318

    blessedwife318
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2014
    Messages:
    1,872
    Likes Received:
    324
    I also have no problem saying that Baptist are Protestants. Also you should look at the history of the RCC and Eastern Orthodox to see that your claim of going back to the Apostles doesn't hold up in light of history either.
     
  4. Bro. James

    Bro. James
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2004
    Messages:
    2,633
    Likes Received:
    14
    History is written by the victors--seldom the good guys--there are no good guys--"there are none righteous, not one". We have a preponderance of historical data which testifies to Immanuel--God with us--Jesus, the Christ--yet most of the world does not believe.

    Where is it written that the world will be won to Jesus, The Christ, the Son of the Living God? Quite the contrary is evident. We are still in the falling away mode--heading for Sharia.

    Baptist--Baptists--Anabaptists are generalized terms which need some serious definition.

    True Baptists did not come out of Rome with the so-called attempted Reformation of Rome implemented by Martin Luther in the 16th century. True Baptists trace their faith and practice, not their names, back to the shores of Galilee when Jesus started gathering His little flock.

    That little flock is still being gathered. She has not the marks of the holy see nor the holy see reformed.

    This information is verifiable to anyone with an open mind. The Truth needs no revision. New Advent and Wikipedia have an abundance of half truth and just plain bogus information.

    "Let God be found True, and every man lying"

    "Ye shall know The Truth, The Truth will make you free"

    Most religious folk are chained to a treadmill to oblivion or purgatory if they are worthy. The goal seems to be among the first to get there.

    Even so, come, Lord Jesus.

    Bro. James
     
    #4 Bro. James, May 15, 2015
    Last edited by a moderator: May 15, 2015
  5. JonC

    JonC
    Expand Collapse
    Lifelong Disciple
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    6,920
    Likes Received:
    366
    I think that their point may be that the practice of "believers baptism" and "autonomy of the local church" existed in churches prior to the Reformation (coupled with the fact that the Reformers rejected baptist specific doctrine). By common usage of the term, they are "protestant," and even if they reject the notion since baptistic doctrine was foreign to the Catholic church, they should realize that Anabaptist groups also joined the Reformation movement.

    The fact that there were churches outside of the Catholic church is very evident (you may want to research this a bit more - look for example, at Jan Hus and the Hussites which were outside of the Catholic church. Pope John Paul II, BTW, apologized for killing him...I don't know if Mr. Huss accepted the apology :smilewinkgrin:). Luther condemned many congregations (for, BTW, holding what is now baptist doctrine) and said that they were "among us but not a part of us." They joined the Protestant movement but quickly wanted to reform the Reformers. Your statement that there was only the Catholic Church (if you mean a Church under the rule of a Pope) is incorrect. But your point is well taken about Baptists who protest being called Protestant.
     
  6. Bro. James

    Bro. James
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2004
    Messages:
    2,633
    Likes Received:
    14
    Reforming the Reformers

    How does one reform apostasy? Infant baptism is an apostate doctrine-- always has been always will be. True Baptists regarded Romish baptism as null and void. This incensed the holy see. They killed those who would not recant. The daughters of Rome brought with them the same errors without much reforming. It is still this serious error which the anti-pedobaptists find abhorrent, even in this wonderful world of ecumenism.

    "Let God be found true and every man lying".

    Even so ,come, Lord Jesus.

    Bro. James
     
  7. McCree79

    McCree79
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2015
    Messages:
    1,128
    Likes Received:
    33
    Yes, they still held to infant baptism, but at least they didn't view it as requirement of salvation. When you spend you life indoctrinated by the RCC, to get as close to the "Baptist truth ", as they did is impressive to me. It was a big step in the right direction.
     
    #7 McCree79, May 15, 2015
    Last edited by a moderator: May 15, 2015
  8. lakeside

    lakeside
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2011
    Messages:
    826
    Likes Received:
    0
    The Real History of the Baptists

    With the corruption of the hierarchy of the Roman Catholic Church, an Augustinian priest named Martin Luther, overreacted in his attack against the corruption of the hierarchy and was then later excommunicated in 1521 for denying the historical understanding of salvation.

    In 1517 Germany, during Martin Luther’s first attack on the historic Christian doctrines, another preacher named Thomas Munzer attacked Martin Luther’s position on how the Church should follow Christ and be saved. Just before his execution in 1525, he recanted everything, made a good confession, received Communion, and died united to the Catholic Church.

    Though he maintained Luther’s positions on the new doctrines of the Bible Alone and Salvation by Faith Alone, Munzer also believed the sacrament of baptism to infants was not valid since infants couldn’t believe or make a decision in belief. Therefore, his new position was that all babies who were baptized must at the age of reason make a confession of faith and be re-baptized as a sign of the individual’s new belief in Christ.

    Munzer also denied the sacrament of the Eucharist claiming Christ did not become transubstantiated on the altar of Catholic churches. He believed the Eucharist was merely a symbolic gesture of Christ’s sacrifice on the cross. He once undermined the Catholic Mass by using pretzels and beer as meal offerings in place of bread and wine to prove he did not believe in the sacrificial character or the Real Presence. Most Baptists today use crackers and grape juice to indicate the same belief as Munzer.

    In 1525, a Catholic priest named Menno Simons set up the first Anabaptist churches. Their purpose was to establish what they held as a spiritual kingdom of converts to real Christianity independent of all civil and church authority. This historic fact debunks Dr. Carroll’s contention that Anabaptists existed before the Reformation.

    The term Anabaptist or “Re”baptist stems from the fact that these new Protestants practiced rebaptism for all those converted out of the Roman Catholic Church. The rebaptisms always took place with water being poured over the top of the head just as the Roman Catholic Church had been doing for 1500 years. Never was total body immersion thought to be necessary.

    Menno Simons’ new church came to be known as the Mennonites. The Amish today are one of several sects that have split from the Mennonite Church. They appear to be one and the same to many outside of these two religions.

    In 1602, an Anglican priest named John Smyth refusing to conform to the Church of England fled England to Amsterdam, Holland and tried to become a Mennonite. He went so far as to rebaptise himself by pouring water over top of his own head. Again, as an Anglican, he never thought that one needed to be immersed. However, doubting the validity of his self-administered baptism was again rebaptised by the Dutch Mennonites for his third baptism. Due to his views on salvation, the Mennonites later rejected him.

    In 1609, he established what we could rightly call the very first Baptist Church in history. In 1611, John Smyth with his friend Thomas Helwys compiled a “Confession” or a “Declaration of Faith” combining Martin Luther’s new doctrines: the Bible alone is the sole authority of faith, and a faith alone for salvation with adult (children but not infants) believers only to be baptized (no mention of immersion as the practice was then of pouring). It also stated the Church must be completely separated from the state. All civil authorities were to take care of temporal affairs only and allow the freedom of religion to all.

    The fatal flaws pertaining to these positions is a church constantly dividing, which always comes with a bible only belief, leaving the ultimate interpretation of the Scriptures to each individual. The other is a state that is separated from the Church will always result in an anti-religious state, just as it did in America with its false democratic government which keeps out the reign of Christ as King of its society.

    After the death of John Smyth in 1612, Helwys along with his companions returned to England to set up its first Baptist Church at Spitalfields, in London. Thomas Helwys later died in 1616.

    The first two churches along with the members were known as the General Baptists for their teaching of the general atonement for all men. They believed in the total free will of man to choose to be saved. Again, they believed in pouring water in baptism until they adopted the method of immersion in 1650 by the splinter group known as the

    Immersion Baptists founded in 1644. This group was an offshoot of yet another splinter group called the Particular Baptists founded in the mid 1630’s.

    It was the Immersion Baptists with their new confession of faith that sealed forever the name that came to be known as the Baptist church. However, they would merge back with the Particular Baptists and become one.

    The Particular Baptists founded by John Spillsbury in Southwark, England did not hold to the belief of the general atonement. This group based its beliefs on the new doctrines first founded by the notorious Protestant Reformer John Calvin who claimed a limited (particular) atonement of Christ’s sacrifice and along with Luther believed in double-predestination.

    Though very Calvinistic at first, they were influenced by the teachings of the Anglican clergymen John and Charles Wesley. With this influence, William Carey in 1792 established missionaries following the example of Roger Williams, the Anglican priest turned Baptist convert who came to America establishing its first Baptist church. He later died rejecting his baptism and organized religion altogether.

    In 1891, the Baptist Union of Great Britain and Ireland were formed by a unification of General and Particular Baptists. However, many Baptist churches refused to join in the union, leaving them to be independent churches.

    The Baptist churches in America grew quickly and in 1845 divided in three major Conventions: Northern, Southern, and Colored (Black). Later they divided again and again into many different sects. Today there are American Baptists, American Baptists USA, Baptist Bible Fellowship, Missionary Baptists, Bethel Baptists, Central Baptists, Conservative Baptists, Baptist Church of Christ, Free Will Baptists, General Baptists, Landmark Baptists, National Baptists, National Baptists USA, National Missionary Baptists, National Primitive Baptists, North American Baptists, Primitive Baptists, Progressive Baptists, Reformed Baptists, Separate Baptists, Seventh Day Baptists, Southern Baptists, United Baptists, United Free Will Baptists, Berean Fundamental Baptists, Bible Fellowship Baptists, Bible Protestant Baptists, and Bible Way Baptists.
     
  9. lakeside

    lakeside
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2011
    Messages:
    826
    Likes Received:
    0
    Black Baptists

    Since black Americans constitute a large part of Baptists, I would like to touch upon their role in the Baptist religions.

    Today, 4 out of 5 blacks in America are Baptists. This is due to the white English Protestants who owned and proselytized their slaves in early America.

    The slave trade was justified by the Protestants using the New Testament which speaks of a type of slavery however unlike the slavery of early America. This is the result of Luther’s Bible Only doctrine, which allows anyone to interpret Scripture entirely for themselves without the authority of the church to put parameters on such interpretations.

    The slaves used the Old Testament books showing the horrors of slavery with the example of the captivity of Israel in Egypt. The words of Moses, “Let my people go” was the rally cry of slaves who escaped or attempted to escape to freedom from their English slave masters.

    Catholics were forbidden to have slaves as all the popes during those times condemned the slave trade as a damnable sin. However, a few so-called Catholics did continue and participate in the slave trade. Most black Catholics in America came from the French who married into the race and the Spanish who helped the slaves escape from the English Protestants.

    However, the English greatly outnumbered the French and Spanish and pushed the French to the Southern tip of Louisiana and to the north into Canada, while the Spanish where pushed back into Central and South America.

    Though in America most blacks are Baptists, in the rest of the world, black Catholics far outnumber any other religious group for the exception of Islam.

    In the mid-1800’s, most slaves were Methodists following Wesleyan theology. Over the years the slaves and their children began joining the Baptist churches because of its Calvinist Theology, which is more appealing. Due to the racism found in the churches, blacks began to build and establish their own churches, which they could worship, fellowship, and lead their own congregations.

    Contrary to Wesleyan theology, Calvinist theology might stress Christ’s words; “take up my yoke, which is easy” which concerns resting in Christ for He did all the work and suffering. Not only would this appeal to all men but also especially with slaves who have done nothing but work and suffer their whole lives, not to mention the many years of hardships that followed after their freedom was granted.

    For black America today, the Baptist church is the church of family history where the emphasis is on the preaching on Word of God and the praising the Lord in song. The closeness of the black family resides in the faith of their ancestors, which had become the Baptist religions for most of them.

    Next
    Nicknames of early Baptists?
     
  10. lakeside

    lakeside
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2011
    Messages:
    826
    Likes Received:
    0
    Nicknames of early Baptists?

    So what about Dr. Carroll’s claim that Baptists came under the nicknames of Paulicians, Anabaptists, Donatists, Albigenses, Waldenses, Montanists, and Novations?

    Well, we know about the Anabaptists, but the rest of these groups are a whole other story.

    The Paulicians originated from the Eastern Rites of the Catholic Church in the 7th century and continued into the 12th century. They believed Christ only appeared in human form and only seemed to have died. They greatly emphasized the Epistles of Paul (hence the name Paulicians), while rejecting the Epistles of Peter and the entire Old Testament.

    Donatists were named after Donatist the Great, a Catholic Bishop of Carthage in 313 AD, who split from the Catholic Church. Donatists were ex-Catholics who believed in all seven sacraments of the Catholic Church. However, they believed the sacraments were invalid if the minister (priest) of the sacraments was impure or in mortal sin. This was contrary to the Catholic belief that Christ is the real minister of the sacraments and the priests were the ambassadors of Christ.

    The Montanists originated in the 2nd century and lasted through the 9th century. They believed they were oracles of the Holy Spirit, and the only possessors of any charismatic qualities. They were opposed to any kind of art and were a quasi-form of Gnostics. However, they did believe in the seven sacraments of the Catholic Church.

    The Novations were a schismatic group named for the man Novation who set himself up as the pope in 251 AD.

    The Albigenses of the 11th century and the Waldenses of the 12th century were a part of Catharism. Cathars had many different sects. In general, they all believed the world and all matter were evil.

    Albigenses were named for the place, Albi, France, where the heresy originated. They with the Waldenses were vegetarians who practiced promiscuity. They believed the body was evil and the spirit must be freed from the body. They practiced extreme mortifications with tremendous fasts, sometimes even to the point of suicide. Since they believed offspring was evil, marriage and infant baptism were forbidden. Since they also believed the body was evil, they rejected the incarnation of Christ.

    The extreme measure Dr. Carroll goes to prove Baptists go back to the time of Christ is quite an insult to his own religion. For no Baptist would dare claim these groups as their own who rejected the Old Testament and the Epistles of Peter, believed in the seven sacraments of the Catholic Church, and forbidding marriage while practicing promiscuity.

    However, the attempt to find the oldest and most like the church described in the New Testament is made by Dr. Carroll because he realized it is absolutely necessary to demonstrate their church or at least their beliefs can be found and substantiated in every generation since Christ.

    Unfortunately for them, only one church can do what they wish their church could do. The Roman Catholic Church is the only church found in every generation since Christ and has always remained unified in doctrine resulting in a unified Church. Only the Catholic Church can be totally substantiated in history, Scripture and logic.

    As for the untold numbers of Baptists who were put to death by the Catholic Church during the dark ages, they were untold because it didn’t happen. As for their history being written in legal documents and papers of those ages, they don’t exist and never did. Dr. Carroll just plain lied about it because he knew the biggest obstacle in his belief system was the Roman Catholic Church. Thankfully, however, rumor has it that he recanted everything on his deathbed and admitted his lies.

    As for the claim that Baptists were not Protestants since they did not come out of the Catholic Church is a half-truth since they actually came out of the Church of England under the influence of the Dutch Mennonites. This means that they were Protestants since they held to the two foundational doctrines never known in history, which caused the revolt against Rome.


    Next-

    Conclusion

    The common thread for all Baptists is the practice of adult baptism by total immersion only while rejecting
     
  11. lakeside

    lakeside
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2011
    Messages:
    826
    Likes Received:
    0
    Conclusion

    The common thread for all Baptists is the practice of adult baptism by total immersion only while rejecting infant baptism. All Baptists believe in Luther’s doctrine of Sola Scriptura or the Bible Only as the sole authority on faith. All Baptists agree with Luther, Calvin, and the other notorious Reformers that the Catholic Church’s papacy is false because Protestants believe it is unbiblical in their personal interpretations of the Scripture, which again stems from the doctrine of Sola Scriptura.

    Most Baptists believe in Luther and Calvin’s doctrine once-saved-always-saved.

    With this in mind, Catholics have five important questions for Baptists:

    1. What church would you have attended before the first Baptist church was established and built in 1609 or before the Protestant Revolt?

    2. If you already know for sure you are going to be in heaven, why the need to hope and work out your salvation in fear and trembling as St Paul said to do? After all, if you know already you’re going to heaven, hope is not needed, and there would be no need to fear and tremble.

    3. In light of St. Paul stating in a salvation context that he might end up a reprobate himself if he didn’t buffet his body, how is it he didn’t know for sure he was going to heaven but you do?

    4. If once saved always saved is true, why does the Bible warn in a salvation context of falling away or being cut off if it were impossible for one to fall away or be cut off?

    5. Why belong to a man-made religion based on man-made beliefs about the Bible, which run contrary to the entire 1500-year history of Christianity? If the answer is something like, “My beliefs come from the Bible” then what about the entire Christian world who never believed in those things for next 1500 years until those particular beliefs were resurrected during the 16th century?

    Since the Baptist churches are not united in their interpretation of Scripture, they claim that it doesn’t really matter what church of faith you belong to as long as you believe and trust Jesus.

    However, did not Christ pray that they (the church) be one? Did Christ’s prayer fail to achieve what He asked the Father? Did not Christ say that the gates of hell would never prevail against his church?

    Doesn’t that mean His church is to be found in every generation till the end of time teaching nothing but the truth?

    History is the key.

    We are told to hold fast to the faith that was delivered from the beginning and calls to mind the warning of St. Paul, “But even if we, or an angel from heaven, should preach to you a gospel contrary to that which we preached to you, let him be accursed. As we have said before, so now I say again, If any one is preaching to you a gospel contrary to that which you received, let him be accursed.” Galatians 1:8-9

    The Baptist Church’s interpretation of Scripture was never believed or taught for 1500 years of Christianity such as the Bible being the ONLY authority and rule of faith, or adult baptism by immersion only, or a once-saved-always-saved belief.

    The historic Christian recognizes that the Baptist faith is another gospel, which was never ever preached by anyone until the 16th century Protestant Revolt. According to St. Paul under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, “let him be accursed.”

    When Baptist preachers are confronted with this contradiction, they almost always retort that it is not about religion but a relationship.

    This final statement is all they can muster because in the end they know their religion could not be truly and logically justified historically or even by Holy Scripture. It doesn’t matter to them because they claim to have a relationship with Christ and nothing was going to separate that relationship.

    The problem with this understanding is religion is the very substance of the relationship. Without the religion, the relationship is hollow. The very definition of religion is the system of belief based on faith and the outward practices of life by which men indicate their relationship with God.

    This means that a false religion is a false relationship with one’s own God or a wrong religion is a wrong relationship with one’s own God.

    It’s that simple.

    Christ instituted His Church { founded on Matt.16; 15-19 }so we can have the right relationship with Him. Those who refuse to accept it are like the ones whom Jesus spoke, “He who rejects you rejects me and he who rejects me rejects the one who sent me.”

    There are many people who completely fabricate lies about the Catholic Church, and/or misrepresent it.

    I’ve seen it all and it amazes me how easy it is to debunk them all.

    Christ said, “The path to destruction is a wide one and many are those who take it, but the path to paradise is a narrow one and few who even find it.” We may live in a confusing world but the narrow path can be found for Christ would not have left us without being able to find it.

    I submit the One Christian Apostolic Faith is that path for it is the only faith that can be found throughout the entire history of Christianity. It was the faith of Peter to whom Jesus gave the keys. It was the faith of all Peter’s successors. It was the faith of Stephen who was the first to die because of it. It was the faith of all the saints.

    The Roman Apostolic Faith is the faith found in all generations since Christ and if this faith is not it… then nothing else is.
     
  12. JonC

    JonC
    Expand Collapse
    Lifelong Disciple
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    6,920
    Likes Received:
    366
    Now who's the historic revisionist?


    falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus
     
    #12 JonC, May 15, 2015
    Last edited by a moderator: May 15, 2015
  13. lakeside

    lakeside
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2011
    Messages:
    826
    Likes Received:
    0
    Truth can not contradict Truth.

    The majority of competent historians all agree that a small sect of present day Baptists hold on to this sort of revisionist history. Also the archives of main-line Protestant churches call your history as bogus in that your group also came from the Church of England along with the Separatists, and Puritans came to America while the Baptist went first to Holland in the 16th century.
    Not only other Protestants [ the majority ] but also secular historians along with Jewish historians confirm that the Baptist denomination began in the 16th century. Your certain Baptist historians have had to make this all up to support their fallacious first century Baptists.
     
  14. lakeside

    lakeside
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2011
    Messages:
    826
    Likes Received:
    0
    Jon C, name one Doctrine that the Church has changed since the First Century?
     
  15. Salty

    Salty
    Expand Collapse
    20,000 Posts Club
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    22,083
    Likes Received:
    218

    When you say "the Church" I assume you are speaking of the Roman Catholic Church?

    This list has 26 items.
     
  16. McCree79

    McCree79
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2015
    Messages:
    1,128
    Likes Received:
    33
    Answers:
    1. If they knew what they knew now. They would break off from the apostate church like everyone else was doing since the 3rd century.
    2. The process of sanctification, which is part of salvation, is on going. One must "work out on your own" that part of salvation.
    3.Give me your verses you are referring to.
    4. You are missing the context of the argument in Hebrews.
    https://www.dropbox.com/s/0j0ujaohsfar5sn/15_Perseverance of the Saints.mp3?dl=0
    5. The pagan beliefs that were brought into the church, by mid 3rd century, had built the majority of the man made belief system the RCC holds today. Then when Constantine came around to to fully make the RCC of Man....it was all over.
     
  17. McCree79

    McCree79
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2015
    Messages:
    1,128
    Likes Received:
    33
    Great list Salty. I will add 3 things.

    185 AD Irenaeus began to bodily declare the "magic" of the sacraments. Such as baptism and Lord's Supper. Which the RCC went on to embrace.

    160 AD pagan preist Montanus brought mortal sins and venial sins into the church. Which the RCC also went on to embrace.

    By the end of the 3rd century the bishop, separating it from presbyter, had became the 3rd church office. A break from the model the Apostles gave us.
     
  18. JonC

    JonC
    Expand Collapse
    Lifelong Disciple
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    6,920
    Likes Received:
    366
    I am making observations, not debating with you because we work off an entirely different foundations. But here are a few:

    Celibacy and the priesthood
    Non-Catholics damned
    Withholding the communion cup
    Pre-communion fast
    Infallibility of the Pope
    Emersion changed to sprinkling
    Evil of Democracy as secular government
    Several doctrines connected to Mariology

    Your response as a Catholic should be that these are not changes in doctrine but changes in discipline, government, etc…and perhaps noting that Mariology has evolved (newer doctrines did not negate the old). From my perspective, the obvious problem with what you should say is that doctrine dictates discipline, church government, etc. (which cannot be legitimately excluded from doctrine).
     
  19. PreachTony

    PreachTony
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2014
    Messages:
    1,910
    Likes Received:
    0
    Part One

    Your argument is flawed in oh-so-many ways...
    Some rather interesting statements made with no backing statistics or studies. There are plenty of Baptists who do not hold to OSAS. As for the papacy, they're right. Nowhere in scripture is the office of the Pope established. You have to do some serious scripture twisting and eisegeting to find it.

    This is an unanswerable question. There are too many variable. Also, remember that at no time in history as their been only one Christian church. The fact that Paul planted so many during his missionary journeys, and within a few short years they were already at scriptural odds pretty much bursts the bubble of your idea of a single scripturally/doctrinally united church existing for 1500+ years. But to attempt an answer to your question: I don't know. What churches were around in Northeast Georgia prior to 1609?

    Are you saying that you have no assurance of your salvation? I can believe that, as I've known many Catholics who have no idea what salvation is. They can only point to their baptism as an infant. If you believe pouring water on a baby can save their soul then God help you. You cannot be more scripturally wrong. By the by, at how many Catholic services does fear and trembling enter into the equation?

    Only you on this forum are saying Paul wasn't assured of his salvation. He knew. He, like many of us, had a personal relationship with his Lord, Jesus Christ. Paul wasn't depending on rites and rituals to carry him to Heaven. He had the Lord. Can you at least provide the scripture you are referring to?

    I don't always agree with John MacArthur, but he nailed it with the quote that, if you could lose your salvation, you would. If God is the final arbiter of our salvation (which even us non-Cals believe) then what makes you think man can overrule his own salvation after the fact?

    Did you look in a mirror when you wrote that?

    There's truth in that. When I am judged before God, the church at which I was a member isn't going to prevent me entering His Glory.

    If you're going to say "Paul said..." or "Christ said..." then at least provide the scripture where they said it. Yes, Christ did say the gates of Hell would not prevail against His church. Newsflash! He wasn't talking about a literal, physical church building on this Earth. He was talking about the body of believers that make up His church. The writer of Hebrews called us the General Assembly and the Church of the Firstborn.

    It sure is. I wish you had studied it.

    See? How hard was that? In the King James, those verse read:
    To some, the word "contrary" carries a connotation of "opposition." But in the KJV, you get the sense that the gospel doesn't have to be outright opposition. It just has to be different. So many false doctrines out there today are oh-so-very close to the gospel we preach. There is only the slightest deviation. When I was working for a defense contractor doing satellite communications, one of the first things you learn is that, even if you are only off by a half a degree at your earth terminal, you can miss the satellite by hundreds of miles. Taking in one of these false doctrines and following it, while it might seem close to the gospel at first, can only lead to destruction and ruin. Do you want to go over the false doctrines the Catholic church holds to?

    Only believers were baptized in the scriptures. And everyone that was baptized gave a statement of faith beforehand. If you think that still authorizes infant baptism then you might as well throw your bible away, because you're obviously not using it. Every doctrine you mentioned was taught from the beginning. It was only when Rome consolidated its power and claimed itself the head of Christianity that those doctrines were shuffled to the back.

    If you think baptists preach "another gospel" then what in the world are you doing on a baptist forum!?! If we offend you so badly then get out!

    Get this through your obviously RCC brainwashed head...I am not going to Heaven because I am a Baptist. I am going to Heaven because my Lord and my Savior, Jesus Christ, took my place on the cross and died for me, then stepped out of the grave victorious over Death and Hell. Therefore I will go to the church that most closely fits the doctrine of Jesus Christ and His disciples, which I find to be the Baptist church. When I look at scripture and I look at the RCC, it amazes me that you people can be so horribly fooled by obvious damnable heresy.
     
  20. PreachTony

    PreachTony
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2014
    Messages:
    1,910
    Likes Received:
    0
    Part Two

    You seem to think that our relationship with God comes from our religion, but that's wrong. Our religion comes from our relationship with God.

    :BangHead:

    You are erroneously placing your faith in a church built on Peter. Peter is not the stone that the builders rejected. Peter is not the chief cornerstone. Peter is not the foundation of our lives. You know who Peter was? Peter was a sinful man in need of a savior, just like us. The foundation of the church is Jesus Christ. The rock the church is built upon is the statement "Thou art the Christ, the Son of the Living God," not on the one making the statement.

    Your idea of debunking is to refer to doctrines established by men in extra-biblical sources. That's not debunking. Just so you know, the Catholic church has fabricated quite a lot.

    What translation are you using?

    No, the physical church is not the path.
    Consider Jesus's own words "I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me (John 14:6)."

    Considering the Roman Catholic Church itself did not exist until the 4th Century AD, then your statement is false.
     

Share This Page

Loading...