Are Terrorists Encouraged?

Discussion in 'News / Current Events' started by Arbo, Apr 22, 2013.

  1. Arbo

    Arbo
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2010
    Messages:
    3,942
    Likes Received:
    1
    By essentially shutting down Boston during the manhunt for the two bombers, have terrorist groups learned how easy it is to get into Americans' heads? After all, isn't that what their goal is?
     
  2. mactx

    mactx
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2006
    Messages:
    220
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yep. They now know folks fear them and will give up liberty if the price is right.
     
  3. Arbo

    Arbo
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2010
    Messages:
    3,942
    Likes Received:
    1
    I believe that we are one step closer to London-type surveillance after last week's event.

    It's sad that this generation seems to be so eager to trade away principle for percieved security.
     
  4. InTheLight

    InTheLight
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2010
    Messages:
    16,185
    Likes Received:
    610
    What is "London-type" surveillance? I know they have a lot of cameras in public spaces. A lot. But it is in public spaces after all.
     
  5. InTheLight

    InTheLight
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2010
    Messages:
    16,185
    Likes Received:
    610
    I think they already knew how to push our buttons. There is a difference between a manhunt and a random act of violence insofar as shutting down an area is concerned.

    No, their goal is to advance a political or other agenda through terror. Otherwise they would be anarchists, not terrorists.
     
  6. Arbo

    Arbo
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2010
    Messages:
    3,942
    Likes Received:
    1
    This is what I meant.
     
  7. Arbo

    Arbo
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2010
    Messages:
    3,942
    Likes Received:
    1
    But if the outcome is the same, what is the difference?

    Agree. You stated it better than I did.
     
  8. InTheLight

    InTheLight
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2010
    Messages:
    16,185
    Likes Received:
    610
    I don't think that shutting down Boston was the goal of the terrorists. It wasn't their desired outcome (so far as I know.) Certainly their goal was not to get killed/caught!
     
  9. Arbo

    Arbo
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2010
    Messages:
    3,942
    Likes Received:
    1
    It may not have been their goal, because it was unprecedented, but I'd bet they weren't disappointed by it. They spooked Americans, which to them appears to be a battle won.
     
    #9 Arbo, Apr 22, 2013
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 22, 2013
  10. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    38,278
    Likes Received:
    780
    What do you propose to do in that situation?
     
  11. Don

    Don
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2000
    Messages:
    10,539
    Likes Received:
    208
    Any terrorist act is meant to create public awareness. The more, the better. It brings awareness of the terrorists' overall goals, agendas, and views.

    Things like Boston shutting down were unintended goals; they had the same effect (media attention) without being planned for.
     

Share This Page

Loading...