Armed U.N. Guards Halt Climategate Questions

Discussion in 'Politics' started by carpro, Dec 11, 2009.

  1. carpro

    carpro
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    20,894
    Likes Received:
    294
    http://biggovernment.com/2009/12/11...lists-questions-about-climategate/#more-44722

    UN Security Stops Journalist’s Questions About ClimateGate

    by Mike Flynn


    A Stanford Professor has used United Nation security officers to silence a journalist asking him “inconvenient questions” during a press briefing at the climate change conference in Copenhagen.

    Professor Stephen Schneider’s assistant requested armed UN security officers who held film maker Phelim McAleer, ordered him to stop filming and prevented further questioning after the press conference where the Stanford academic was launching a book.
     
  2. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    38,273
    Likes Received:
    777
    Libbies do not want climate gate questioned, do not want evolution questioned, do not want vaccines questioned etc. It is the libby way
     
  3. Dragoon68

    Dragoon68
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2003
    Messages:
    4,511
    Likes Received:
    0
    The truth gets in the way of the agenda so it has to be ignored or suppressed. Junk science and rumors are leading us towards more ridiculous environmental control regulations. Other nations of the world will be pleased to see America cut down by its own rules.
     
  4. saturneptune

    saturneptune
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    13,977
    Likes Received:
    0
    It is beyond me why we are members of the UN, besides supporting it with our tax dollars and military. One of the best things that could happen to regain some of our sovereignty is to move UN headquarters to another country.

    It would be one thing if nations were cooperating for the good of all, but that is not the case. The UN is nothing more than an organization that drains our national resources and uses them in an agenda whose purpose is to oppose the interests of the United States.
     
  5. MrJim

    MrJim
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2007
    Messages:
    354
    Likes Received:
    0
    ...so looking forward to UN bluehelmets coming here to "fix" problems in the US[​IMG]
     
  6. poncho

    poncho
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    Picture of the future.

    No dissenting views will be tolerated by the world government.

    Forget about the "libbies" and try and concentrate on what's really going on here.


    In the last several weeks we have learned several new facts about climate change research. First, climate scientists' motives are biased. Second, scientists actively discussed how to achieve political ends through their research. Third, and more disturbingly, the public has learned of discarded data, attempts to keep opposing views silent, and total political adherence to an ideology. Yet, without thinking twice, the main stream media and President Obama have shrugged off the controversy and continued boldly with their partisan agenda. It is clear the science behind climate change is biased and disputed, leaving the propaganda machine as the only fact that remains.

    Research by the conservative Media Research Group has stated that since the Climategate scandal broke out, ABC, CBS, and NBC have not mentioned the story in any of their news casts including their morning shows. Even when the outlets discussed Obama's upcoming trip to Copenhagen, the controversy was never mentioned. There has been no mention of recently published research questioning climate change or that thousands of scholars disagree. Recently, the Wall Street Journal has raised questions of silencing dissenting opinions at the EPA, and there are now questions about NASA's data. Even with a wide variety of dispute, the networks continue to use the language of propaganda including "undisputed, unequivocal, settled, and consensus."

    Despite the media's refusal to discuss dissenting opinions, the media continues to universally promote climate change policies. Just as the climate conference begins, the EPA announced that greenhouse gases are toxic, the UN stated this decade may turn out to be the hottest on record, and 56 newspapers around the world ran a common front page editorial supporting drastic climate change action. Here is an excerpt from the editorial:
    Social justice demands that the industrialized world digs deep into its pockets and pledges cash to help poorer countries adapt to climate change, and clean technologies to enable them to grow economically without growing their emissions.... And fairness requires that the burden placed on individual developed countries should take into account their ability to bear it; for instance newer EU members, often much poorer than "old Europe", must not suffer more than their richer partners.
    The authors also continue on to invoke the words of Lincoln to inspire us to change and then finish by calling those who do not, "stupid." Again, it is clear only calculated propaganda remains!


    Full Article

    I know how badly you all want to make this into another leftie vs rightie thing and I understand, after all you've been conditioned to instinctively react this way. But for the next few moments just forget about the "libbes" and everything you think you know about "democrats" and try to understand that there's a bigger threat here than just a bunch of wacky lefties and the liberal media.

    Because if you don't your life in the very near future is going to be ruled by a global bureaucracy that will not tolerate any opposing views.

    If you still believe you can rely on the "republicans" to save our national bacon ask yourself this, how many are even talking about getting us out of the United Nations?

    Wasn't the guy who long ago uttered the words in my signature below a "republican"?

    What Did George Bush Jr. do to get us out of the United Nations? He made a big show in front of the cameras remember "Mr. Unilateralist" while sending his wife over seas to make sure UNESCO would be allowed to indoctrinate our children and promote "social change".

    Around the world, educational systems, beginning in elementary school, are organized to promote social change. In some instances, children can now attend public schools such as The Little Village Lawndale High School in Chicago and focus exclusively on social justice classes. To highlight the calculated attempt to indoctrinate our youth, in March 2009 the United States Congress passed the Generations Invigorating Volunteerism and Education Act (GIVE). Under section 6104 of the bill, entitled "Duties," the legislation states "Whether a workable, fair, and reasonable mandatory service requirement for all able young people could be developed, and how such a requirement could be implemented in a manner that would strengthen the social fabric of the Nation and overcome civic challenges by bringing together people from diverse economic, ethnic, and educational backgrounds."

    In addition to education, modern propaganda must build on societies need for safety, security, and community. It must exploit human weaknesses in a comprehensive, total, and unyielding manner through all available channels. This is accomplished by inundating individuals with constant propaganda such as the news, youtube, magazines, and teachers.ons. As previously mentioned, the large media outlets refuse to provide dissenting opinion. The UN now has its own youtube channel called "Raise your voice and change climate change." The cover of the Economist on newsstands today reads "Stopping Climate Change," and every news article I read uses the word "consensus."

    The end effect of this organized media blitz is to focus the public on one event, climate change, to the exclusion of all the rest. The ability to set the public agenda and determine social perceptions is a powerful tool in social psychology. For it is clear that when individuals are faced with large social opposition or view themselves as out of the norm, individuals typically move towards the mean. The mean in this case is fascism and socialism.
     
    #6 poncho, Dec 13, 2009
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 13, 2009

Share This Page

Loading...