Featured At Last, Some Real Leadership

Cost is not the issue.

For one thing it's cultural. similarly you can't for example want Muslims to not be offended by those who eat pork.
How many times have we seen Muslims complain just because of usage and/or ads for bacon, ham, etc...

http://www.dcclothesline.com/2015/1...-from-federal-prisons-to-accommodate-muslims/

Call it prudish or whatever - its cultural here in America.


HankD

 

They're on very shaky legal ground here. But that won't bother an administration that routinely breaks the law, passes their own legislation in the oval office, ands spends money that has not been appropriated by Congress.

"Lawless" is a classic understatement.

 

Yes. along with a SCOTUS that looks the other way or accommodates said administration by MAKING new "progressive" law rather than interpreting the Constitution . And because it has gone unpunished by a house which is sound asleep (Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z) at the keel, future liberal "progressive" administrations will continue in the "lawlessness" for what end only the Lord knows comrades.

HankD

 

99% of what you say is puzzling to folks on here.

 

Another thing about all stalls in public toilets.

Even if one uses the paper toilet seat covers ("provided by the management for your safety"), there is the possibility of an infectious disease lurking in the uncleaned parts of the bowl, cover, etc...

Yes I am prone to hypocondriasis.

Like Adrian Monk, I avoid public restrooms except for an emergency.

HankD

 

Is the idea that other countries don't argue over it supposed to carry weight?

It is possible that they don't argue over it because they are morally inferior.

The idea that other countries are different from the US on any issue seems meaningless to me unless one can establish a moral superiority in those countries which leads them to not have such an issue with transgenderism. Until you can establish that, I do not see how this point you try to make is valid.

 

I agree, the immoral, immodest perversion of other countries in no way imposes a standard on us.

 

Yes, it shows that we're blowing out of proportion something that has an easy solution.

Nope. THey don't argue over it because it's stupid. Pay your dollar, go in and use the bathroom and leave.

Stop trying to change the narrative. No moral superiority is needed. You got a bathroom with a door on it. You want to use it? PAy your money to use it and go on about your business.

 

I'd have to venture that there aren't too many countries in the world that are more immoral than the richest country in the world.

 

In my opinion this is the first (or second or third... or 100th) olive out of the bottle named "Immodest & Immoral".

More to come down the road, especially if we have the coronation our queen from "Inside the Beltway".

In my opinion of course.

HankD

 

Hello Luke! Long time no see! Good to have you posting again.

 

Yes, it shows that we're blowing out of proportion something that has an easy solution.


No, it isn't.

It is not stupid. And we don't pay dollars to use the restroom. That's stupid.

No.

 

Yes it is. The country has survived 240 years almost without folks being confused about where to go to the bathroom.

I didn't say we did. I was referencing what is done in several European countries. You pay the money to go into your stall. you use the bathroom and you leave.

It's not complicated so I don't get why we're making this a thing.