1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Big Bang Disputed

Discussion in 'Science' started by Helen, Sep 11, 2004.

  1. Paul of Eugene

    Paul of Eugene New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2001
    Messages:
    2,782
    Likes Received:
    0
    You're absolutely, perfectly right in this statement. We're merely quibbling over the details.
     
  2. jcrawford

    jcrawford New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2004
    Messages:
    708
    Likes Received:
    0
    You're absolutely, perfectly right in this statement. We're merely quibbling over the details. </font>[/QUOTE]Who's "quibbling?"

    God certainly isn't.
     
  3. Paul of Eugene

    Paul of Eugene New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2001
    Messages:
    2,782
    Likes Received:
    0
    OK Jc, merely extrapolate the appropriate plural reference for the "we" in "we're merely quibbling" and you'll have you answer. [​IMG]
     
  4. jcrawford

    jcrawford New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2004
    Messages:
    708
    Likes Received:
    0
    Why quibble about the creation of new species? Either Goddidit or evolutionary processes did.
     
  5. UTEOTW

    UTEOTW New Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2002
    Messages:
    4,087
    Likes Received:
    0
    Now this is different than the answer you gave on the other two threads last night. In those threads you indicated that it could be both. Which is the right answer. God created the new species through evolutionary processes which He authored the rules for and uses as part of His will and plan.
     
  6. jcrawford

    jcrawford New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2004
    Messages:
    708
    Likes Received:
    0
    The "right" answer depends on which theories of information, design, epistomology and theology one subcribes to, no?
     
  7. UTEOTW

    UTEOTW New Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2002
    Messages:
    4,087
    Likes Received:
    0
    For Gina

    You were asking earlier about dark matter... Currently no one knows what it is, but I came across something recently you might find interesting. A leading candidate is something called supersymmetric particles. Explaining just what these are is well beyond my ability, but the short answer is that they are particles related to the familiar particles but with a different quantum characteristic called spin. They are also much heavier.

    Current speculation favors the photino (the supersymmetric particle of the photon) or the zino or higgsino (supersymmetric particles of the particle that carries the weak nuclear force and Higgs field respectively).

    Interestingly, calculations of how many and at what mass such particles should have been produced during inflation match calculations from the standard model of particle physics and from string theory have all combined on the same range from different methods.

    The Large Hadron Collider under construction will be able to probe this region for the first time to see if the predictions match reality. Though we cannot say for sure, now, what dark matter is, there is a chance we will find it in the next 10 years or so.
     
  8. Daisy

    Daisy New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2003
    Messages:
    7,751
    Likes Received:
    0
    No, there was no Universe before the Big Bang, therefore no time. Time is a property of an expanding (or contracting) universe.

    Just nothing before: no time, no space, no universe.
     
Loading...