Featured Billy Graham Organization's Hypocrisy

It's a shame because he's been a stalwart for the faith with some stupid decisions mixed in. But folks remember the stupid stuff.

 

Why is it that the same group of people who don't like me saying anything non-flattering about their candidate of choice are allowed to go from thread to thread constantly berating and making the threads about me instead of the topic of the OP?

I'm just saying because the stuff that just happened in this thread is what the same people do in every thread and then the thread gets closed for being off topic.

 

Or perhaps some folks need to stop being rude in making demands behind the veiled threat of getting folks removed from certain sections based upon what they don't know.

As I said, some have a very bad habit of making the threads about me instead of what the original topic is. And do the same thing from thread to thread.

If it's personal information that I want you to know, I'll tell you based upon the perceived motive in a PM.

Otherwise, stick to the topic and not me.

 

And I could see things being done this way if the person truly felt the issue was morality. But the way that it was done seems to point , possibly, to it being about politics.

I mean how do you risk authoring confusion about people's possible eternity over something like this? It completely breaks my heart to see the Church at this point where we seemingly don't even care about the fallout of potential souls going to hell ( if we are even thinking about it) all for the sake of getting what we want.

There is something VERY wrong.

 

No one said that they did. But if the lies of Mormonism interferes with them receiving the truth, why author confusion about it's truthfulness or cult status?

If one of the top Christian evangelists perhaps of all times...if his organization doesn't see anything wrong with it anymore, then maybe it's okay to be a Mormon?

Is it not enough that one person may believe that and reject the Gospel of Jesus Christ as the result?

So why author confusion about something that could keep them there if they chase after it instead of God's truth?

 

And when people are making comments about ME that they believe to be true and I know it is not, then I have every right to say that the discernment is not from God. And the same people do it CONSISTENTLY and then try to justify it.

I don't think I've called anyone self-righteous. I've certainly been called self-righteous.

True statements that do not address any specific person.

My threads generalize and don't point out any specific person on this board. Yet every response from you and others toward my threads seems to make a beeline right back to me personally with some sort of personal dig.

:applause::applause:

I don't even think he should have turned down the request. He meets with everyone and always has. He's just never openly taken sides, and probably for good reason.

But to take sides and then seemingly compromise on something like this almost gives the picture that something else is going on.

I don't know. This was rather foul.

Again, if it's just one person, isn't that one too many over something he and his organization had been very clear in their teaching about for decades?

How and why do you do something like that when possibly somebody's eternity might be affected by it?

I keep hearing "Obedience is better than sacrifice". And there seems to be an immeasurable amount of folks thinking their sacrifice is better than obedience.