A common objection to definite atonement is that Judas broke bread and drank the cup with Jesus at the last supper. 'Surely,' one reasons, 'this is evidence that Christ died for all men. He even said, 'This is my body broken for you,' and so on. Let's look at the verses closely and consider the wording. Luk 22:19-22 And he took bread, and gave thanks, and brake [it], and gave unto them, saying, This is my body which is given for you: this do in remembrance of me. Likewise also the cup after supper, saying, This cup [is] the new testament in my blood, which is shed for you. But, behold, the hand of him that betrayeth me [is] with me on the table. And truly the Son of man goeth, as it was determined: but woe unto that man by whom he is betrayed! In this luke passage, Christ speaks TO the disciples and OF Judas. Listen closely to how he speaks: "This is my body broken for YOU. This is my blood shed for YOU." Then he shifts gears and says, "The hand of HIM that betrayeth me..." Though Judas was in the room, Christ wasn't speaking to him as evidenced by the way he speaks of Judas in the third person. Jesus does the same thing in Matthew: Mat 26:23-28 And he answered and said, He that dippeth [his] hand with me in the dish, the same shall betray me. The Son of man goeth as it is written of him: but woe unto that man by whom the Son of man is betrayed! it had been good for that man if he had not been born. Then Judas, which betrayed him, answered and said, Master, is it I? He said unto him, Thou hast said. And as they were eating, Jesus took bread, and blessed [it], and brake [it], and gave [it] to the disciples, and said, Take, eat; this is my body. And he took the cup, and gave thanks, and gave [it] to them, saying, Drink ye all of it; For this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins. Judas is HE, and the disciples are YOU. Big difference in wording. Notice also that Christ's blood is shed for MANY for the remission of sins- not all. Again in Mark! Mar 14:21-24 The Son of man indeed goeth, as it is written of him: but woe to that man by whom the Son of man is betrayed! good were it for that man if he had never been born. And as they did eat, Jesus took bread, and blessed, and brake [it], and gave to them, and said, Take, eat: this is my body. And he took the cup, and when he had given thanks, he gave [it] to them: and they all drank of it. And he said unto them, This is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many. Judas is 'that man.' And the blood is shed for 'many' not 'all.' But he drank the cup! Of course he did. But it was only a cup. It was only the fruit of the vine and not actual salvation. Christ made no reference to the blood being shed for Judas- which means the picture of the atonement was not used on Judas. Judas drank his own cup and paid for his own sins. In fact, 1 Cor. 11:27 speaks of drinking it 'unworthily' and I believe Judas did this very thing. These passages cannot be used to prove universal atonement. A simple examination of the words show the true intent of Christ's atonement.