Should there be a Calvinist and Arminiam debate due to the heated discussions that take place? I think that it is one of the best learning tools we have. Even though we get angry we still are forced to study to be able to answer our poster on the other side. I think without the C/A debate it would be rather boring for there is no other thread that makes you study more. We get angry at each other and sometimes it gets out of hand but almost always it ends up with respect one towards the other. Of course there are some that harbor hard feelings and will never let go but I hold out to the end but still will be friends with the others if they will be friends with me. I notice that the C/A threads get more discussion and visits than any other threads on here. I for one am glad for them for I have learned a lot from the opposite side. Doubt if they would say they have learned anything, but that is what makes it go around. I respect most on the other side but of course there are a few that seem to just follow you around to needle you but thats goes with the territory. There are heated ones on both sides and I am one of the most heated on the Arminiam side but don't hold hard feelings in the end, but seems like when I let the hard feeling go, something new pops up and an new name I become but again, if we can't stand the heat we need to stay out of the kitchen. Guess I didn't ask the questions very good but if your answer is "yes" pick the "should there be C/A Debates. Was just wondering how the rest feel?