1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Featured Calvinists & Arminian Together

Discussion in 'Calvinism & Arminianism Debate' started by evangelist6589, Aug 21, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. RLBosley

    RLBosley Active Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2012
    Messages:
    1,752
    Likes Received:
    0

    "All" you said is Calvinism teaches a different gospel and is under the anathema of Galatians 1.

    Do you comprehend the severity of what you just said?
     
  2. Rippon

    Rippon Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2005
    Messages:
    19,715
    Likes Received:
    585
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Oh I am perfectly certain he knows. He wants to think that all Calvinists are "under the ban" as it is sometimes called.

    Winman is totally wrong theologically, but he intentionally uses language to make it seem as if Calvinists are unsaved. Of course that means he has to devote lots of energy to turn Scripture on its head and to give himself over to slamming Calvinists with the most banal of charges. He is committed to his cause. And that means any and all things must subvert these evil Calvinists according to his viewpoint.

    Is it acceptable conduct for a Christian to do what he has spent thousands of posts doing? In a word --no. He should feel shame --but some cannot even blush the Bible says.
     
    #42 Rippon, Aug 23, 2014
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 23, 2014
  3. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    33,493
    Likes Received:
    3,567
    Faith:
    Baptist
    It's not a question for me...I believe you are speaking of differences in understanding of the same gospel. Being saved in an Arminian church and later becoming more "calvinistic" in my beliefs...well....the gospel I believe has not changed at all although my understanding has. To answer your question, correct doctrine is not essential for salvation. Paul is speaking of the gospel and false teachers.

    The question is for you. Are you saying that Calvinists are not saved?
     
  4. RLBosley

    RLBosley Active Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2012
    Messages:
    1,752
    Likes Received:
    0
    Spot on.

    I am sure he understands it as well, but I was hoping maybe he doesn't. There are only select few groups I would dare utter something like Galatians 18 against. NEVER would I say that about the arminians here. Unbelievable.

    Yes. Like saying the teaching of the effectual inward call of salvation is no different than the "visions" of the false prophets of Mormonism and Islam.

    http://www.baptistboard.com/showpost.php?p=2141975&postcount=291
     
  5. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    33,493
    Likes Received:
    3,567
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Aecht Schlenkeria Rauchbier sounds right up your alley. I lived near the brewery for years...smelled like a hint burnt brownies in the evenings.:smilewinkgrin:
     
  6. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    52,013
    Likes Received:
    3,649
    Faith:
    Baptist

    To be fair many of the reformed posts all but say the same thing about noncals. With that said unless one asserts Calvinism is the gospel reformed folks are not preaching another gospel.
     
  7. convicted1

    convicted1 Guest

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2007
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    28
    My response was to Wes' assertion that sinners do tie God's hands. You don't take offense to that statement?
     
  8. Winman

    Winman Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2009
    Messages:
    14,768
    Likes Received:
    2
    I do not recall ever saying that men "tie" God's hands.

    But men do frustrate God. Jesus lamented that he would have gathered all of Jerusalem to himself as a mother hen gathers her chicks under her wings, and they would not come to him.

    Mat 23:37 O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not!

    This verse makes no sense whatsoever if Calvinism is true. Calvinism teaches that God "passes by" the non-elect and allows them to perish in their sins.

    If so, why is Jesus lamenting over those persons who will not come to him? According to Calvinism, God has not chosen these persons. Obviously, God does not want these non-elect persons to come to him, because if he did he would simply irresistibly regenerate them and they would come.

    You used to understand how absurd and non-sensical this verse would be if Calvinism was true Willis, but you have allowed yourself to be blinded by false doctrine.

    Surely, some part of you still recognizes how ridiculous this scripture would be if Calvinism is true Willis?? Nobody can be that far gone.
     
  9. convicted1

    convicted1 Guest

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2007
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    28
    Oh yes you did! I know for a fact you did. I don't know how to find it, but you, in fact, stated sinners tie God's hands.
     
  10. salzer mtn

    salzer mtn Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2012
    Messages:
    1,581
    Likes Received:
    29
    Believe it or not there are many Cals in real life, maybe not on this board that are just as hard on non-cals as Wineman is on Cals. I have heard one say in the pulpit he hated Arminian's, and used the scripture Psa 139:22 where David said I hate them with a perfect hatred. I told my wife, a preacher is not supposed to preach hate out of the pulpit. Christ said to love your enemies that men might see that you are the children of God. I am constantly hearing out of this same man's pulpit that free willer's are not saved. Just last Sunday the guy said if a man left sovereign grace gospel and went to the free will church he had committed the un-pardonable sin. I've heard him say every thing from a woman that works don't know Christ to if a Christian couple files for a divorce, the one that filed first don't know Christ. So there seems to be enough hatred on both sides to go around.
     
  11. convicted1

    convicted1 Guest

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2007
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    28
    Here ya go Wes:

    Post #98 in the "sincerity" thread in the Cal/Arm forum...
     
  12. Reformed

    Reformed Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2012
    Messages:
    4,960
    Likes Received:
    1,694
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Good morning, Rev.

    I agree that the same type of criticism can be levied on those in the Calvinist/Reformed camp. There are Calvinists who actually believe that unless a person is a Calvinist they cannot be saved. I would rebuke them as sharply as I did Winman.

    I am sure you are familiar with Spurgeon's famous quote, "Calvinism is the Gospel". Spurgeon was not saying that only Calvinists can be saved. What he was saying is that Calvinism is the correct understanding of the Gospel. As a Calvinist I would obviously agree with Spurgeon's statement just as a Dispensationalist would argue that his eschatological system is the correct understanding of eschatology. It doesn't mean a Covenant Theology adherent is unsaved. It just means the Dispensationalist is completely convinced his understanding is correct. It is when someone says "Calvinism is the Gospel", and condemns those who do not hold to Calvinism, that they have committed an egregious sin. That is why I took exception to what Winman wrote.
     
  13. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    52,013
    Likes Received:
    3,649
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Those two are the same thing.
     
  14. Winman

    Winman Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2009
    Messages:
    14,768
    Likes Received:
    2
    OK, I stand corrected. I did not remember saying that, that is not normally a figure of speech I would use. I was probably responding to someone who had used that figure of speech. Either way, I stand corrected and see I did use that term.

    Now Willis, answer Matthew 23:37; Does this verse make sense if Calvinism is true?

    If God intentionally passes by the non-elect, and these persons cannot possibly come to him, why would Jesus lament that he desired to gather them and they would not come?

    This has several problems, first, Jesus desired that they come to him. Did Jesus desire things his Father did not desire? Does that make sense?

    And why would Jesus lament over these folks? If he truly wanted to gather them, couldn't he easily have regenerated them and caused them to irresistibly come to him?

    How in the world can this verse make sense if your doctrine is true Willis?
     
  15. Winman

    Winman Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2009
    Messages:
    14,768
    Likes Received:
    2
    No, Spurgeon was way off here. Calvinism is not the gospel. The gospel is that Jesus died for OUR sins on the cross, and that after three days he was raised from the dead according to the scriptures. It has nothing whatsoever to do with the "Doctrines of Grace" or "TULIP".

    If Calvinism were the gospel as Spurgeon said, then you would need to believe Calvinism to be saved. Horrendous!
     
  16. convicted1

    convicted1 Guest

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2007
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    28
    To be perfectly honest, that verse...Matt. 23:37 does give me a pause. Could it be Christ crying out as a man? I honestly don't know. But when you look at Eze. 34, John 6, 10, 17, Romans 8:28-33, Phpps 2:13, Eph. 1:4,5, Romans 9:16, John 1:13, they all link together, imo...
     
  17. Rippon

    Rippon Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2005
    Messages:
    19,715
    Likes Received:
    585
    Faith:
    Baptist
    To add to what Reformed said, I will quote a snip from his sermon :A Defense of Calvinism:

    "There is no such thing as preaching Christ and Him crucified, unless we preach what nowadays is called Calvinism. It is a nickname to call it Calvinism; Calvinism is the gospel, and nothing else. I do not believe we can preach the gospel, if we do not preach justification by faith, without works; nor unless we preach the sovereignty of God in His dispensation of grace; nor unless we exalt the electing, unchangeable, eternal, immutable, conquering love of Jehovah; nor do I think we can preach the gospel, unless we base it upon the special and particular redemption of His elect and chosen people which Christ wrought out upon the cross..."
     
  18. convicted1

    convicted1 Guest

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2007
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    28
    Then study out those two verses in my sig, Bro. Wes...
     
  19. Winman

    Winman Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2009
    Messages:
    14,768
    Likes Received:
    2
    I have nothing against Calvinists personally, I simply believe Calvinism is a false doctrine. I don't just say that like some folks do, I provide scripture over, and over, and over again to support my view.

    No one ever refutes the scripture I present, they just say it is wrong. That is not an argument.

    But when a Calvinist presents their view, say Irresistible Grace for example, I present scripture that clearly refutes it;

    Mat 22:2 The kingdom of heaven is like unto a certain king, which made a marriage for his son,
    3 And sent forth his servants to call them that were bidden to the wedding: and they would not come.

    See, God calls men to come to the wedding of his son. They are bidden. And God is sincere, he means it. When these folks refuse to listen and come he destroys them. This utterly refutes Irresistible Grace.

    I don't hate Calvinists at all, but I do hate Calvinism, it is false doctrine.

    If I didn't care, I wouldn't say anything.
     
  20. convicted1

    convicted1 Guest

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2007
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    28
    That passage is a picture of the gospel call by men. It's a universal call to all to repent and be reconciled to God. The effectual call, that which is solely of God, Christ addressed in John 6...
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...