Cambridge King James Bible a COUNTERFEIT!

Discussion in '2004 Archive' started by Forever settled in heaven, Aug 7, 2004.

  1. Forever settled in heaven

    Forever settled in heaven
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2000
    Messages:
    1,770
    Likes Received:
    0
  2. Trotter

    Trotter
    Expand Collapse
    <img src =/6412.jpg>

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2003
    Messages:
    4,815
    Likes Received:
    0
    Big deal. Another link to a rabid KJVO site.

    Do they not realise that their 1769 is different from the 1611, and therefore cannot be the word of God?

    Do they not realise that the 1611 had to be corrected numerous times, and therefore cannot be perfect, and therefore cannot be the word of God?

    Does anyone realise that I am being sarcastic and don't really CARE which version they bay about because the entire man-made lie of KJVO stinks to the highest heavens?

    In Christ,
    Trotter
     
  3. NaasPreacher (C4K)

    NaasPreacher (C4K)
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    26,806
    Likes Received:
    78
    Not worth a comment.
     
  4. Dr. Bob

    Dr. Bob
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2000
    Messages:
    29,402
    Likes Received:
    12
    As an Oxford 1762 man, I say an AMEN to the evil Cambridge-only crowd! :eek: :eek:
     
  5. NaasPreacher (C4K)

    NaasPreacher (C4K)
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    26,806
    Likes Received:
    78
    How dare you - I am a faithful Cambridge 1769 man and I take umbrage at your comments!
     
  6. NaasPreacher (C4K)

    NaasPreacher (C4K)
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    26,806
    Likes Received:
    78
    Well----its as good as any other fight ;) .
     
  7. aefting

    aefting
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2002
    Messages:
    874
    Likes Received:
    0
    I can't tell, reading that link, if they are being serious or sarcastic.

    Andy
     
  8. NaasPreacher (C4K)

    NaasPreacher (C4K)
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    26,806
    Likes Received:
    78
    I am afraid they are serious.

    What would they about the differences between 1611 and 1769?!?!
     
  9. rsr

    rsr
    Expand Collapse
    <b> 7,000 posts club</b>
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2001
    Messages:
    10,074
    Likes Received:
    102
    No, they're totally serious. Makes you shudder.
     
  10. HankD

    HankD
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2001
    Messages:
    15,154
    Likes Received:
    322
  11. mesly

    mesly
    Expand Collapse
    Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2002
    Messages:
    283
    Likes Received:
    0
    The author of the article does have a valid point, which is: there are different texts which are sold as the KJV. And as he has pointed out, there are some theological differences (i.e. changing of the "S" in Spirit, to "s" in spirit - which spirit are they talking about - the Holy Spirit or another spirit?).

    As a former KJVO, this used to bother me (as it has the author of the article). He is incorrect in thinking that this is a modern issue. I did some research in looking at older KJV's and found that the variations existed as far back as 1860 - which is the oldest KJV I could personally find.

    It would be nice if someone could compile a list of the differences and the origins of the variations. If anyone knows of such a list, please post the url here.

    But, we need to be careful:

    1 Tim. 6:4, He is proud, knowing nothing, but doting about questions and strifes of words, whereof cometh envy, strife, railings, evil surmisings, (KJV)
     
  12. NaasPreacher (C4K)

    NaasPreacher (C4K)
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    26,806
    Likes Received:
    78
    The differences go back even further. Great differences between 1611 and 1769.
     
  13. Pete

    Pete
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2002
    Messages:
    4,345
    Likes Received:
    0
    [​IMG]

    The page must be parody.

    Best section:
    Emphasis added.

    [​IMG] [​IMG]
     
  14. NaasPreacher (C4K)

    NaasPreacher (C4K)
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    26,806
    Likes Received:
    78
  15. Pete

    Pete
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2002
    Messages:
    4,345
    Likes Received:
    0
    C4K, yeah, I know they're fair dinkum....That just makes that quote even funnier [​IMG] [​IMG] :D
     
  16. moeowo2

    moeowo2
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2004
    Messages:
    244
    Likes Received:
    0
    Oh that is funny!! [​IMG] and yet sad at the same time :( .

    I'll never forget when I worked at a Christian Bookstore and in the bible department and had a KJVO preacher bring in two people from a foreign country and was telling them that the KJV was the only version to get..then he put his hand on the NIV section (he didn't realize it at first) and we he realized that his and has there he freaked out shook his hand as though it was on fire and proceeded to tell the couple this is one of the bibles that are from the devil! It's a sad situation that the couple was in. I prayed that they wouldn't be influenced by that "preacher".
     
  17. NaasPreacher (C4K)

    NaasPreacher (C4K)
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    26,806
    Likes Received:
    78
    In case you are curious, from the link above, is how 10=7:

     
  18. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards
    Expand Collapse
    <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    </font>[/QUOTE]I see divisions in the KJVO ranks here.

    Pastor Gail A. Piplinger's new book
    IN AWE OF THY WORD extensively quotes
    words and phrases from
    the WYCLIFFE Bible of 1389 and from
    an earlier pre-English Bible called
    THE ANGLO-SAXON BIBLE (pre 700AD).
     
  19. natters

    natters
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2004
    Messages:
    2,496
    Likes Received:
    0
    I guess Psalm 12:6 was a lie before the KJV, for it said "are pure" and "purified seven times", not "will one day be pure" and "will one day be purified seven times" long before the KJV came along.
     
  20. NaasPreacher (C4K)

    NaasPreacher (C4K)
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    26,806
    Likes Received:
    78
    According to one segment Psalm 12:6 wasn't really a verse until 1611.
     

Share This Page

Loading...