Cambridge King James Bible a COUNTERFEIT!

Big deal. Another link to a rabid KJVO site.

Do they not realise that their 1769 is different from the 1611, and therefore cannot be the word of God?

Do they not realise that the 1611 had to be corrected numerous times, and therefore cannot be perfect, and therefore cannot be the word of God?

Does anyone realise that I am being sarcastic and don't really CARE which version they bay about because the entire man-made lie of KJVO stinks to the highest heavens?

In Christ,
Trotter

 

Not worth a comment.

 

How dare you - I am a faithful Cambridge 1769 man and I take umbrage at your comments!

 

Well----its as good as any other fight .

 

I can't tell, reading that link, if they are being serious or sarcastic.

Andy

 

I am afraid they are serious.

What would they about the differences between 1611 and 1769?!?!

 

Here's the ONLY solution to KJV counterfeits:

Use the Douay-Rheims ONLY!

After all it PRECEDED the KJV.

http://www.marianland.com/bible20.html

HankD

 

The author of the article does have a valid point, which is: there are different texts which are sold as the KJV. And as he has pointed out, there are some theological differences (i.e. changing of the "S" in Spirit, to "s" in spirit - which spirit are they talking about - the Holy Spirit or another spirit?).

As a former KJVO, this used to bother me (as it has the author of the article). He is incorrect in thinking that this is a modern issue. I did some research in looking at older KJV's and found that the variations existed as far back as 1860 - which is the oldest KJV I could personally find.

It would be nice if someone could compile a list of the differences and the origins of the variations. If anyone knows of such a list, please post the url here.

But, we need to be careful:

1 Tim. 6:4, He is proud, knowing nothing, but doting about questions and strifes of words, whereof cometh envy, strife, railings, evil surmisings, (KJV)

 

The differences go back even further. Great differences between 1611 and 1769.

 

The page must be parody.

Best section:

Emphasis added.

 

Nope - it is real.

Look here though, they sell the KJV1611 INCLUDING the Apocrypha

http://www.biblebelievers.com/bookshop/kjv_defense.html

And here is how 10=7

http://www.biblebelievers.com/Vance5.html

 

C4K, yeah, I know they're fair dinkum....That just makes that quote even funnier

 

Oh that is funny!! and yet sad at the same time .

I'll never forget when I worked at a Christian Bookstore and in the bible department and had a KJVO preacher bring in two people from a foreign country and was telling them that the KJV was the only version to get..then he put his hand on the NIV section (he didn't realize it at first) and we he realized that his and has there he freaked out shook his hand as though it was on fire and proceeded to tell the couple this is one of the bibles that are from the devil! It's a sad situation that the couple was in. I prayed that they wouldn't be influenced by that "preacher".

 

In case you are curious, from the link above, is how 10=7:

 

</font>[/QUOTE]I see divisions in the KJVO ranks here.

Pastor Gail A. Piplinger's new book
IN AWE OF THY WORD extensively quotes
words and phrases from
the WYCLIFFE Bible of 1389 and from
an earlier pre-English Bible called
THE ANGLO-SAXON BIBLE (pre 700AD).

 

I guess Psalm 12:6 was a lie before the KJV, for it said "are pure" and "purified seven times", not "will one day be pure" and "will one day be purified seven times" long before the KJV came along.

 

According to one segment Psalm 12:6 wasn't really a verse until 1611.