1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Featured Can you really BLAME them?

Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by Skandelon, Mar 21, 2012.

Top Posters
Page 3 of 7
  1. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    33,495
    Likes Received:
    3,567
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I didn’t state an argument other than to suggest that men (both the elect and non-elect) fall short of the glory of God. I don’t actually believe that God “undoes” anything in the process of salvation, but instead He redeems and regenerates. Total depravity is descriptive, not punitive – and I don’t agree that God creates men simply to sovereignty damn them. But I do believe that all men sin, and that all fall short of the glory of God – I also believe that everything is accomplished within God’s plan and that God has created men with the capability of choosing one thing over another. The question is not can the lost believe, but will the lost believe. So my view of free-will is more in line with Edwards in that I believe what was tainted in the fall was desire rather than capabilities.

    I’ll cheat here and use another’s words because I am far less eloquent.

    “Why did God hate Esau? …Why does God hate any man? I defy anyone to give any answer but this, because that man deserves it; no reply but that can ever be true. There are some who answer, divine sovereignty; but I challenge them to look that doctrine in the face. Do you believe that God created man and arbitrarily, sovereignty—it is the same thing—created that man, with no other intention, than that of damning him? Made him, and yet, for no other reason than that of destroying him forever? Well, if you can believe it, I pity you, that is all I can say: you deserve pity, that you should think so meanly of God, whose mercy endures forever. You are quite right when you say the reason why God loves a man, is because God does do so; there is no reason in the man. But do not give the same answer as to why God hates a man. If God deals with any man severely, it is because that man deserves all he gets. In hell there will not be a solitary soul that will say to God, O Lord, thou hast treated me worse than I deserve! But every lost spirit will be made to feel that he has got his deserts, that his destruction lies at his own door and not at the door of God; that God had nothing to do with his condemnation, except as the Judge condemns the criminal, but that he himself brought damnation upon his own head, as the result of his own evil works. Justice is that which damns a man; it is mercy, it is free grace, that saves; sovereignty holds the scale of love; it is justice holds the other scale. Who can put that into the hand of sovereignty? That were to libel God and to dishonor him.” (Spurgeon on Rom. 9).
     
    #41 JonC, Mar 23, 2012
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 23, 2012
  2. jonathan.borland

    jonathan.borland Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2008
    Messages:
    1,166
    Likes Received:
    2
    Well preached, brother Spurgeon!
     
    #42 jonathan.borland, Mar 23, 2012
  3. Skandelon

    Skandelon <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2003
    Messages:
    9,638
    Likes Received:
    1
    Again, you are over individualizing the intent of the text. I'M NOT SAYING that individuals aren't involved, because clearly they are, but you are OVERLY emphasizing the individual to the neglect of the obvious intent.

    Who are God's objects of wrath?

    Option 1: Those INDIVIDUALS God didn't salvifically love from the foundation of the earth, and who he chose to punish with Total Inability from birth due to Adam's sin destining them to an eternal hell without hope of turning even when invited by God himself to do so?

    or the biblical answer:

    Option 2: Those PEOPLES who God chose, loved, and held out his hands to all day long (Rm 10:21); but who were unwilling to be gathered (Mat. 23:37), and who freely chose to rebel again and again despite God's long-suffering and patience with them?

    When will you learn that the boys rebellion had nothing to do with it?! They were both rebellious and sinful. You of all people should affirm that. The choice was about which brother would carry the line of Christ and had nothing to do with their morality. Man is saved by grace through faith, those who believe in God are true Israel, but that doesn't change the historical reason God elected Israel, the nation, which was to bring the means of redemption to the entire human race. Jacob and his seed was chosen for this 'noble purpose,' while Esau and his seed were chosen for 'common use.' Those who rebel against God, regardless of who there father is, are objects of wrath prepared for destruction, but the good news is that whosoever believes (Jew or Gentile, of Jacob's line or Esau's line, of the CHOSEN or UNCHOSEN nation) will not perish. Those who DO perish, don't perish because they weren't chosen, 'they perish because they refuse to love the truth and so be saved.' -Paul

    You have WAY too high a view of unbelievers. You give them WAY too much credit. Unbelievers are much much much worse than you think they are. You need to work on your view of man, it obviously stems from pride and a high view of mankind in general.
     
    #43 Skandelon, Mar 23, 2012
  4. Skandelon

    Skandelon <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2003
    Messages:
    9,638
    Likes Received:
    1
    And I never denied that, nor does the OP contradict that view simply because it doesn't address it.

    A distinction without a difference IMO. If you affirm, which I believe you must, that it was God's choice to punish all of mankind by enslaving them with a "Totally Depraved" nature from birth due to the Fall of Adam, then the work of 'regeneration' is indeed 'undoing' what the punishment did.

    A description of what, if not the punishment or judgement of God for the Fall?

    I understand that claim as I once held it too when I affirmed Calvinistic doctrine, but objectively speaking I honestly can't see anyway around that conclusion in a Calvinistic worldview. That doesn't mean you can't hold to that view and appeal to mystery, you can obviously, but it doesn't avoid the apparent contradiction and troublesome conclusions the human mind would naturally draw...and which scripture never adequately answers...which one would think it would given such obvious reactions even by fellow brethren.

    So you affirm contra-causal free will? Or is this meant to convey a 'compatibilistic' understanding of freedom by which men is merely doing as they want, but their wants are determined by their nature which in turn is determined by God?

    Actually it is a question of being 'enabled' because THAT is the word employed by scripture in John 6, which Calvinists often point to as proof text for their view of 'total inability.'

    But even if were to say they are 'unable to be willing' have we really changed the nature of the debate? I think not.
     
    #44 Skandelon, Mar 23, 2012
  5. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    33,495
    Likes Received:
    3,567
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Your assumption is not correct as I do not believe that men are enslaved as a punishment with a totally depraved nature. I believe your misconception of my understanding is that you take it that I hold Beza’s position of predestination as the foundation of all doctrine. I don’t believe that God decreed that man should sin.


    I see total depravity as nothing more or less than descriptive of men, in that men are incapable of saving themselves apart from the grace of God.
    I suppose you could say that I hold a compatibilistic understanding of free will if by that you mean that I believe in divine providence being congruent with human free choice. But I don’t believe that man’s wants are determined by God, but this is of course another topic entirely.

    To assume no “mystery” is to assume that the will of God is identical in kind to the will of man – I’m simply not willing to make this assumption. I do not fully understand man’s will, how arrogant would I be if I supposed to understand God’s? In short, “I am not a smart man, but I know what love is.”
     
    #45 JonC, Mar 23, 2012
  6. jbh28

    jbh28 Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2008
    Messages:
    3,761
    Likes Received:
    2
    Well, should and ability are two different things.
    It has to do with what is meant by "can't." The reason people "can't is because they don't desire two. It's not God keeping them from repenting. Man naturally wants to sin and doesn't want to come to God.
    We have the tools. We have the gospel. Romans 1:20 says we are without excuse. What about the person who never hears the gospel. Do they have an excuse? They never heard it. No, romans 1:20 says they are without excuse. We have the tools. Man still rejects.
    man is not denied. man is responsible for his sins which will be punished.
    How's that? God doesn't have to save anyone. Man punishes sinners because they are sinners and deserve hell. It's only by the grace of God that anyone is saved. Second, God doesn't keep anyone from repenting. He will save all that do. He has called all men to repent. The problem is that many do not.
     
    #46 jbh28, Mar 23, 2012
  7. jbh28

    jbh28 Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2008
    Messages:
    3,761
    Likes Received:
    2
    It was by your wording that it appeared that you were saying we believed that God sent people to hell because they were "predestined" to go there. They go there because of their sin.
    Yes! By the grace of God, you and I will not have to be there. What a great God!

    EDIT: Now the song "O Great God" is in my head. That's good. great song! :)

    Nope, don't think so.

    no, I was fixing your wording because it implied something. God has every right to send people to hell and not offer them salvation. I do not by any means believe that to be true, but he could. It would be just because he would give man justice. Grace is that, grace.
    You'll have to get someone how believes God hates people to answer that. I don't hold to God creating people just to hate them and send them to hell. That to me contradicts God's attributes and the Bible.
     
    #47 jbh28, Mar 23, 2012
  8. Cypress

    Cypress New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2010
    Messages:
    376
    Likes Received:
    0
    Your post is correct as well......JBH's response was exactly as u predicted.
     
    #48 Cypress, Mar 23, 2012
  9. Iconoclast

    Iconoclast Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2010
    Messages:
    21,242
    Likes Received:
    2,305
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    You sound very bitter about God. You blame God for the fall.and its just consequences. Your issue is with God.

    Sin and death have made them that way...yet you seem to not like that a Holy God punishes sin.

    God very graciously reveals himself..by the light of nature,and the light of conscience..leaving men without excuse.
    Then additionally many get to hear the free offer of the gospel...which they promptly reject.

    If God in mercy wants to save one soul..that is His concern and His alone.
    That he saves multitudes...each one who believes and continues to believe is only mercy. The God of the bible is Holy, loving , and righteous...He will always do right.. We do not need to doubt this...at all.:thumbs:
     
    #49 Iconoclast, Mar 23, 2012
  10. Aaron

    Aaron Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2000
    Messages:
    20,253
    Likes Received:
    1,381
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Nope. You are simply trying to avoid it. Paul has overruled your objection.
     
    #50 Aaron, Mar 23, 2012
  11. Forest

    Forest New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2012
    Messages:
    549
    Likes Received:
    4
    The non-elect would not even think upon the four things that you have listed. The non-elect does not believe in a God or the hereafter. Ps 73, They are not in trouble as other men; neither are they plagued (divinely punished) like other men, (whom the Lord loveth he chasteneth). Therefore pride compasseth them about as a chain; violence covereth them as a garment. Their eyes stand out with fatness; they have more than heart could wish. They are corrupt, and speak wickedly concerning oppression; they speak loftily. They set their mouth against the heavens, and their tongue walketh through the earth. Therefore his people return hither; and waters of a full cup are wrung out to them. And they say, How doth God know? and is there knowledge in the most High? Behold, these are the ungodly, who prosper in the world; they increase in riches. And David said,"when I thought to know this, it was too painful for me; Until I went into the sanctuary of God; then understood I their end".
     
    #51 Forest, Mar 23, 2012
  12. Forest

    Forest New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2012
    Messages:
    549
    Likes Received:
    4
    Non of mankind is innocent, including his elect.
     
    #52 Forest, Mar 23, 2012
  13. Forest

    Forest New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2012
    Messages:
    549
    Likes Received:
    4
    John 6:37-41, Christ died for the sins of those that God gave him only, and said that he would raise them all up at the last day without the loss of one. None of those that Christ died will lose their eternal salvation. They can lose their fellowship with God by being dissobedient, but they can not lose their eternal salvation.
     
    #53 Forest, Mar 23, 2012
  14. Earth Wind and Fire

    Earth Wind and Fire Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2010
    Messages:
    33,462
    Likes Received:
    1,575
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Really? Are you suggesting that the rein of God is a democracy.
     
    #54 Earth Wind and Fire, Mar 23, 2012
  15. Forest

    Forest New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2012
    Messages:
    549
    Likes Received:
    4
    Christ took care of abolishing all the sins, past, present and future, of every one that he died for on the cross. There is no sin that the elect will commit that will keep him from everlasting life in heaven. God will chasten us when we sin, but that sin will not endanger our entrance into heaven.
     
    #55 Forest, Mar 23, 2012
  16. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    33,495
    Likes Received:
    3,567
    Faith:
    Baptist
    :thumbsup:
     
    #56 JonC, Mar 23, 2012
  17. Skandelon

    Skandelon <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2003
    Messages:
    9,638
    Likes Received:
    1
    What is meant by 'naturally'? By nature? What is nature, if not God?

    But apparently that work of the Spirit isn't sufficient apart from the regenerative work of Spirit, right?

    No they don't. I agree. But WHY don't they have an excuse? Because they 'clearly see and understand' the revelation, right? If they can understand God's attributes just from what they see in creation, then how much more so can they see and understand the clear gospel explanation spoken in their own language? Yet, doesn't Calvinism teach they can't understand unless the Spirit does some EXTRA work, as if His work to inspire, preserve and send the message wasn't enough?

    He punished all mankind for the sin of Adam by making all men born totally depraved. That or it just happened by accident?

    Why don't they in your worldview? Because God didn't choose to save them. He didn't grant them faith? Or do you believe He did grant them faith?
     
    #57 Skandelon, Mar 23, 2012
  18. Skandelon

    Skandelon <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2003
    Messages:
    9,638
    Likes Received:
    1
    Then how did they come to be enslaved and totally unable to willing come even when invited by God himself?
     
    #58 Skandelon, Mar 23, 2012
  19. Earth Wind and Fire

    Earth Wind and Fire Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2010
    Messages:
    33,462
    Likes Received:
    1,575
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Interesting Jon, you & I have very similar beliefs. :thumbs:
     
    #59 Earth Wind and Fire, Mar 23, 2012
  20. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    33,495
    Likes Received:
    3,567
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I didn’t think that they were enslaved and totally unable to willingly come even when invited by God Himself. The only requisite for a sincere invitation is that if the conditions are met that the offer will be granted, but that said, men are fully capable of responding to a general call – they are not willing.
     
    #60 JonC, Mar 23, 2012
(You must log in or sign up to post here.)
Page 3 of 7
Loading...