1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Chevy's Pedal to CCM Metal

Discussion in '2000-02 Archive' started by swaimj, Nov 5, 2002.

  1. Cindy

    Cindy <img src=/Cindy.JPG>

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2000
    Messages:
    1,277
    Likes Received:
    0
    I tend to agree with Smoke-Eater: Steve Camp was one of the major CCM artists of the eighties.

    I'm not sure what is driving his latest incarnation as a CCM critic and watchdog of sorts. I think he really does see himself as something of a voice crying in the wilderness,and his motives seem to be pure.

    There's no question that he's alienating many of his fellow artists with his approach,though. Conversely,Charlie Peacock...who has raised many of the same concerns...appears to be doing so without alienating the people he's criticizing. Maybe Peacock comes off as raising concerns without being judgmental, while Camp seems more strident...I don't know.

    The viewing of Christian music primarily as an "industry" is unsettling and disturbing to me as well. Until reading some of the comments in this thread,though, I was OK with the Chevrolet sponsorship...now I'm not so sure.
     
  2. Kiffin

    Kiffin New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2001
    Messages:
    2,191
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think in many ways Camp is very similar to the late Keith Green who was a lightning rod for controversy in his criticism of CCM in it's early years and both men I think come across as abraisive while Peacock and Card do not for maybe taking a differant approach.

    I don't think it is jealously on Steve Camp's part in that his pastor John MacArthur has been a major critic of modern day Christianity for years and no doubt he is influenced by his pastor on this. If some major artist like a Michael W. Smith, Rebecca St. James or a Stephen Curtis Chapmen would speak out I do think the Industry would listen more but for now it is just a few lonely voices.
     
  3. Karen

    Karen Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2000
    Messages:
    2,610
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't think I have a problem with it. The view of several here seems to be that corporate sponsorship of a "concert" would be fine, but not of a "worship experience". I have been to a number of concerts in which I worshipped (Gaither concerts and all-night sings come to mind), :D
    but I always realized it was not church.

    We often complain that "the world" is antagonistic to Christians, but then we complain that something good is made available in a way that actually keeps ticket prices down.

    On a much smaller level, I come from a region of MO and OK in which GROCERY stores and other businesses often bring in Southern Gospel groups as part of special activities.
    Not too long ago, my parents had a great time at a Speer Family concert, held at the 35th anniversary celebration of a grocery store.
    They worshipped God at the concert, did not have to pay admission, enjoyed themselves hugely, and never once confused it with a worship service in a church.

    Karen
     
  4. swaimj

    swaimj <img src=/swaimj.gif>

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2000
    Messages:
    3,426
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thanks for the good discussion of the issue so far. I think that Steve Camp's four objections to this practice...
    ...are excellent objections and form a good Biblical grid on this issue. I think that CCM, as an industry, constantly violates these guidelines. It shows that CCM is more about money than it is about ministry. If they give out the gospel, I agree that God is glorified, but if the industries practice is outside of Biblical guidelines, then its goal is something other than the glory of God. Given this, it is not worthy of our support.

    One comment on this:
    I think there is a huge difference between a Christian business owner who financially supports the cause of the gospel and a company like GM, which is neither owned by nor run by Christians, supporting "ministry" as a way to market. For a minister to consciously connect himself to such a practice is to engage in an "unequal yoke", and the end result will not be beneficial.

    In history, there was a time when the early church was persecuted by the state. Then, with Constantine, the state accepted the church and began to support it financially. The change from persecution to acceptance was a short-term gain for the church. However, the long-term effect of the merger of church and state was wrong and frankly, is one of the main reasons Baptists exist. We saw the error of the merger. Baptists should recognize the error of a merger of ministry and the corporation and refuse to participate in it---IMHO! [​IMG]
     
  5. Matticus

    Matticus New Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    92
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ok. God should most definitely be put first in CCM. But they still need to live!!! They need money to tour, money for instruments, money for studio time etc...Plus food and a house and clothes. They still need to be paid somehow. So they sell cd's, they get money for tours from sponsors (like Chevrolet) and people buy tickets to go see them play. We have to support them if we want them to continue to exist as they do. CCM has to be a business, as well as being a ministry.

    God Bless

    Matt
     
  6. Ransom

    Ransom Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2000
    Messages:
    4,132
    Likes Received:
    1
    The point is, if a concert is a means for the artist to make a living, it should be billed as a concert, not a worship meeting. Concerts are legitimate venues for making profit. Worship meetings are not.

     
  7. Mike McK

    Mike McK New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2001
    Messages:
    6,630
    Likes Received:
    0
    My problem isn't where we worship or even Chevy's underwriting of it.

    It's that you're paying for a worship service.

    I hope this doesn't sound too overblown, but to charge people money to attend a worship service sounds awfully close to the moneychangers who charged people lareg amounts of money for the sacrficial animals and the Bible tells us that Jesus didn't really see the humor in that.

    If it was just a regular MWS concert, I would think it was fine to charge as much as the market would bear, and if worship broke out at a for-profit concert, that would fine too. But to pay for the priviledge of worshipping, I just can't get behind that.
     
  8. Jonathan

    Jonathan Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2000
    Messages:
    536
    Likes Received:
    0
    So what will come out next, Amy Grant pontificating about marital fidelity?

    I like Steve Camp but he couldn't carry Smitty's water bucket. The Chevy sponsorship could be a mixed bag for Christian music in general. For the record, I'm in favor of getting the message that Smith and 3rd Day bring by almost any means possible.
     
  9. Ransom

    Ransom Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2000
    Messages:
    4,132
    Likes Received:
    1
    Did Amy Grant repent of marital infidelity? I hadn't heard.
     
  10. Mike McK

    Mike McK New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2001
    Messages:
    6,630
    Likes Received:
    0
    Evidently not. She was on a Barbara Walters special a couple of weeks ago and still insists that there was nothing wrong with her cheating on her husband and divorcing him for unbiblical reasons, refusing his pleas for her to seek reconciliation through counseling.
     
  11. Ransom

    Ransom Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2000
    Messages:
    4,132
    Likes Received:
    1
    Evidently not.

    And that, then, is the reason Steve Camp is worth listening to when he speaks on the state of the CCM industry, and Amy Grant is worth not listening to when she speaks on marital fidelity.

    [ November 13, 2002, 01:22 PM: Message edited by: Ransom ]
     
  12. Kiffin

    Kiffin New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2001
    Messages:
    2,191
    Likes Received:
    0
    Jonathan said,

    For one thing Steve Camp repentance or change of heart was regarding the way he conducted his music ministry not committing adultery as Grant did. So you are comparing Apples and Oranges.

    You said,
    So if one is a better singer, he is more qualified to be a spokesperson for CCM.

    The CCM industry as a whole I do not believe is trying to get out a message but is more about the almighty dollar. It is a sad testimony for CCM when Oneness Pentecostals: Philips, Craig and Dean are promoted by CCM magazine despite their denial of the Trinity and being members of Churches that teach work salvation. What will be next for CCM? Jehovah Witnesses musicians singing for "Jesus". If the bucks flow in probably so.

    I wonder if the late Keith Green, who believed so strongly that CCM not mix with the world. was alive today, what would he think of the music industry he helped pioneer?
     
  13. WW2'er

    WW2'er New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2002
    Messages:
    89
    Likes Received:
    0
    Here's a very good review of this Concert/Worship Experience that takes into consideration Steve Camp's open letter. It's good reading for all that are interested in this topic.

    http://www.cmcentral.com/concertreviews/183.html

    Grace and Peace,
    WW2'er
     
  14. Bill Rayborn

    Bill Rayborn New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2002
    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    We are so funny. Almost every major music publisher is owned by a secular company....one of the most talented writer of Christian music of a few years ago is Jewish...some of the most talented arrangers and composers are gay....

    I remember years ago when I was at OBU and the Bison Glee Club was singing at some Baptist function...the speaker told about how he had sat on the plane next to an intoxicated passenger. As they discussed what the speaker did, the passenger insisted on giving him a large sum of money for his ministry. The speaker said..."Now you may say that is 'tainted' money. I agree, 'taint enough." (Well, it was funny then.)

    If the world wants to bankroll a sacred concert, I say more power to them. It is only if their money begins to influence the message that the witness is weakened.
     
  15. swaimj

    swaimj <img src=/swaimj.gif>

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2000
    Messages:
    3,426
    Likes Received:
    0
    Bankrolling a concert as an anonymous donor is one thing, but sponsoring it for the financial benifit is unwise. This practice WILL compromise the message, maybe not in this instance, but it will happen. When it does, the compromisers will deny their action after the fact as surely as they deny its possibility before the fact.
     
Loading...