1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Christ in Daniel 9

Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by asterisktom, Feb 10, 2010.

  1. Jerome

    Jerome Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2006
    Messages:
    9,796
    Likes Received:
    700
    Faith:
    Baptist
    And just look at what the leading Baptist pastor of the 1800s declared:

    A confession of faith, circa 1890:

    How refreshing to see so many early Baptists of basically similar beliefs about the Millennium.

    I wonder if Tom Nettle's series on Baptist history will include this:laugh:
     
    #21 Jerome, Feb 12, 2010
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 12, 2010
  2. asterisktom

    asterisktom Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 29, 2007
    Messages:
    4,202
    Likes Received:
    607
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Daniel 9 is my focus

    I only have time tonight for a short post here. I plan to give answers tomorrow to some of the posts above.

    As far as the Millennium is concerned: I don't believe in a future 1000 year reign, but I don't want to discuss it now. The reason is that I believe there is a better way to convince than to go the "is-not/is-too" route. What convinced me that there was no Millennial reign (1000 years of earthly, physical reigning from Jerusalem, return to sacrifices, etc.) was not a study of Revelation, but a careful study - and respectful discussion over months - on other passages of scripture. One of the most prominent, in my case, was this one here, Dan. 9. Also an in-depth study of much of Hebrews. After this I was left with the unmistakeable conclusion that there was actually no place for such a millennial reign or government. I saw it as an unscriptural anachronism; worse, an unbiblical countering of Christ's true reign.

    This is the reason why I wanted to go into greater detail in places like Daniel 9. And I will continue discussing with those who are respectful. Just don't have time tonight.
     
  3. OldRegular

    OldRegular Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Messages:
    22,678
    Likes Received:
    64
    The following excerpts are from Baptist Confessions of Faith by William L. Lumpkin . Please note that all except the London Confession of 1644 do mention a General resurrection and Judgment.

    Confessions of English Baptists in England

    The following Confessions are from Baptists in England. The earliest and most significant confession of the Baptists in England, the London Confession of 1844 does not mention the resurrection and judgment but does affirm the return and triumph of Jesus Christ. [The reference does not mention the resurrection and judgment, however, the Confession located at
    http://www.oldschoolbaptist.org/Articles/1644LondonConfessionOfFaith.htm
    does mention the resurrection and judgment.

    1. The Midland Association Confession [1655]

    Article 16 [page 200].

    “That at the time appointed of the Lord, the dead bodies of all men, just and unjust shall rise out of their graves, that all may receive according to what they have done in their bodies, be it good or evil.”

    2 The Somerset Confession [1656]

    Article XL [page 214].

    “That there is a day appointed, when the Lord shall raise the unjust as well as the righteous, and judge them all in righteousness, but every man in his own order, taking vengeance on them that know not God, and obey not the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ, whose punishment will be everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord.”

    3 The Standard Confession [1660]

    Article XX [page 231].

    “That there shall be [through Christ who was dead but is alive again from the dead] a Resurrection of all men from the graves of the earth, both the just and the unjust, that is, the fleshly bodies of men, sown into the graves of the earth, corruptible, dishonourable, weak, natural, [which so considered cannot inherit the Kingdom of God] shall be raised again, incorruptible, in glory, in power, spiritual, and so considered, the bodies of the Saints [united again to their spirits] which here suffer for Christ, shall inherit the Kingdom, reigning together with Christ.”

    Article XXI [page 231].

    “That there shall be after the Resurrection from the graves of the earth, An eternal Judgment, at the appearing of Christ and His Kingdom, at which time of judgment which is unalterable, and irrevocable, every man shall receive according to the things done in his body.”

    4. The Second London Confession [1677]

    Chapter XXXI. Of the State of Man after Death and of the Resurrection of the Dead [page 293]

    “1. The Bodies of Men after Death return to dust and see corruption; but their souls [which neither die nor sleep] having an immortal subsistence, immediately return to God who gave them; the Souls of the righteous then being made perfect in holiness, are received into Paradise where they are with Christ, and behold the face of God in light and glory; waiting for the full redemption of their bodies; and the souls of the wicked, are cast into hell; where they remain in torment and utter darkness, reserved to the judgment of the great day; besides these two places for Souls separated from their bodies, the Scripture acknowledgeth none.

    2. At the last day such of the Saints as are found alive shall not sleep but shall be changed; and all the dead shall be raised up with the self same bodies, and none other; although with different qualities, which shall be reunited with their Souls again forever.

    3. The bodies of the unjust shall by the power of Christ be raised to dishonour; the bodies of the just by His Spirit unto honour, and be made conformable to His own glorious body.”

    Chapter XXXII. Of the Last Judgment [page 294]

    “1. God hath appointed a Day wherein He will judge the world in Righteousness, by Jesus Christ; to Whom all power and judgment is given of the Father; in which Day not only the Apostate Angels shall be judged; but likewise all persons that have lived upon the Earth, shall appear before the tribunal of Christ; to give an account of their thoughts, Words, and Deeds, and to receive according to what they have done in the body, whether good or evil.

    2. The end of Gods appointing this Day is for the manifestation of the glory of His Mercy, in the Eternal Salvation of the Elect, and of His Justice in the Eternal damnation of the Reprobate who are wicked and disobedient; for then shall the Righteous go into everlasting life, and receive the fullness of Joy, and Glory, with everlasting reward in the presence of the Lord; but the wicked who know not God, and obey not the Gospel of Jesus Christ, shall be cast into Eternal torments, and punished with everlasting destruction, from the presence of the Lord, and from the glory of His power.

    3. As Christ would have us to be certainly persuaded that there shall be a Day of judgment, both to deter all men from sin and for greater consolation of the godly, in their adversity; so will he have that day unknown to Men, that they may shake off all carnal security, and be always watchful, because they know not at what hour, the Lord will come; and may ever be prepared to say, Come Lord Jesus, Come quickly, Amen.”

    5. The Orthodox Creed [1679]

    Article XLIX. Of the State of man after Death and of the Resurrection of the Dead [page 333]

    “The bodies of men after death return to dust and see corruption; but their souls, or spirits, which neither die nor sleep, having an immortal subsistence, immediately return to God who gave them; the souls of the righteous then being made perfect in holiness, are received into paradise where they are with Christ, and behold the face of God in light and glory; waiting for the full redemption of their bodies; and the souls of the wicked, are cast into hell; where they remain in torment and utter darkness, reserved to the judgment of the great day. And besides these two places for souls separated from their bodies, the holy scripture mentions none. At the last day such of the saints as are found alive shall not sleep but be changed; and all the dead shall be raised up with the self same bodies and none other; although with different qualities, which shall be reunited with their souls forever and forever, but the bodies of the unjust shall by the power of Christ, as a severe and just judge, be raised to dishonour; and the bodies of the just and righteous by His Spirit, as He is the head of the catholic Church, unto honour, and be made conformable with His glorious body, and shall enjoy everlasting life; in singing perpetual praises and hallelujahs to God for ever and ever. Amen.”

    Article L. Of the last Judgment [page 334]

    “And lastly, we believe God hath appointed a day, wherein He will judge the world in righteousness, by Jesus Christ, to Whom all power, and judgment is given of the Father; in which day, not only the Apostate Angels shall be judged; but likewise all persons that have lived upon the Earth, shall appear before the tribunal of Christ; to give an account of their thoughts, words, and deeds, and shall receive a just sentence, according to what they have done in their bodies, whether good or evil, when God according to His purpose, will manifest the glory of His mercy, in the salvation of His elect, and of His justice in the eternal damnation of the wicked and disobedient; for then shall the righteous go into everlasting life, and receive the fullness of joy and glory, but the wicked who know not God, nor obey the gospel offered them in Christ, shall be cast into everlasting torments, and punished with everlasting destruction, from the presence of the Lord, and from the glory of His power. Amen.
     
  4. Jerome

    Jerome Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2006
    Messages:
    9,796
    Likes Received:
    700
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Where do you come up with this stuff?

    The 1644 Confession, Paragraph 40:
    and Paragraph 52:
     
  5. Jerome

    Jerome Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2006
    Messages:
    9,796
    Likes Received:
    700
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Oops. You must have inadvertantly failed to include (for the third time!) the very next paragraph in the Standard Confession of 1660, Article XXII:
    I understand that things like this are easy to repeatedly overlook and omit.
    Gotta love the old Baptist doctine:thumbs:
     
  6. OldRegular

    OldRegular Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Messages:
    22,678
    Likes Received:
    64
    Perhaps you need a remedial course in reading?
     
  7. OldRegular

    OldRegular Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Messages:
    22,678
    Likes Received:
    64
    I understand that things like this are easy to repeatedly overlook and omit.
    Gotta love the old Baptist doctine:thumbs:[/QUOTE]

    Look Jerome

    If you are going to question someone's veracity please have the courtesy to reference your source. Please read again the introduction to my initial post on Baptist Confessions of Faith, that is if you have finished the course in remedial reading.

    The reference in the above quote is, to those with discernment, Baptist Confessions of Faith by William L. Lumpkin. Again those who read with discernment should note that I was discussing the General Resurrection and Judgment not the so-called millennial reign.

    Now as to the Standard confession the following source

    http://www.reformedreader.org/ccc/tsc.htm

    presents the following:

    XX. That there shall be (through Christ who was dead, but is a live again from the dead) a Resurrection of all men from the graves of the Earth, Isa. 26. 19. both the just and the unjust, Acts 24. 15. that is, the fleshy bodies of men, sown into the graves of the earth, corruptable, dishonourable, weak, natural, (which so considered cannot inherit the Kingdome of God) shall be raised again, incorruptable, in glory, in power, spiritual, and so considered, the bodies of the Saints, (united again to their spirits) which here suffer for Christ, shall inherit the Kingdome, raigning together with Christ, 1 Cor. 15. 21, 22, 42, 43, 44, 49.

    XXI. That there shall be after the Resurrection from the graves of the Earth, An eternal Judgment, at the appearing of Christ, and his Kingdome, 2 Tim. 4. 1. Heb. 9. 27. at which time of judgment which is unalterable, and irrevocable, every man shall receive according to the things done in his body, 2 Cor. 5. 10.

    XXII. That the same Lord Jesus who shewed himself alive after his passion, by many infallible proofs, Acts I. 3. which was taken up from the Disciples, and carried up into Heaven, Luke* 24. 51. Shall so come in like manner as he was seen go into Heaven, Acts. 1. 9, 10.
    II. And when Christ who is our life shall appear, we shall also appear with him in glory, Col. 3. 4. For then shall he be King of Kings, and Lord of Lords, Rev. 19. 16. for the Kingdome is his, and he is the Governour among the Nations, Psal. 22. 28. and King over all the earth, Zech. 14. 9. and we shall raign (with him) on the Earth, Rev. 5. 10. the Kingdomes of this World, (which men so mightily strive after here to enjoy) shall become the Kingdomes of our Lord, and his Christ, Rev. 11. 15. for all is yours, ( 0 ye that overcome this world) for ye are Christ's, and Christ is Gods, 1 Cor. 3. 22, 23. For unto the Saints shall be given the Kingdome, and the greatness of the Kingdome, under (mark that) the whole Heaven, Dan. 7. 27. Though (alas) now many men be scarce content that the Saints should have so much as being among them; but when Christ shall appear, then shall be their day, then shall be given unto them power over the Nations, to rule them with a Rod of Iron, Rev. 2. 26, 27. then shall they receive a Crown of life, which no man shall take from them, nor they by any means turned, or overturned from it, for the oppressor shall be broken in pieces, Psal. 72. 4. and their now vain, rejoycings turned into mourning, and bitter Lamentations, as ‘tis written, Job 20. 5, 6, 7. The triumphing of the wicked is short, and the joy of the Hypocrite but for a moment; though his excellency mount up to the Heavens, and his head reach unto the clouds, yet shall he perish for ever, like his own dung; they which have seen him, shall say, where is he?

    The comments in Section 22 in no way affect the teaching of a General Resurrection and Judgment taught in Sections 20 and 21!
     
  8. Jerome

    Jerome Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2006
    Messages:
    9,796
    Likes Received:
    700
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Sigh.
    Again I ask where are you coming up with this stuff?
    Yes, I am having trouble following which words are yours and which are not.

    You wrote:
    Whose words are these? You are quoting Lumpkin, is that right?
    If so, on what page exactly does he wrongly state that the 1644 Confession did not mention the resurrection and judgment?

    Thanks:)
     
    #28 Jerome, Feb 13, 2010
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 13, 2010
  9. asterisktom

    asterisktom Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 29, 2007
    Messages:
    4,202
    Likes Received:
    607
    Faith:
    Baptist
    454 BC: The Seventy Weeks Artaxerxes Gives the "Word"

    454 BC: The Seventy Weeks
    Artaxerxes Gives the "Word"

    There is an interesting, oft-overlooked significance to that word, and a wealth of meaning that connects both Testaments. But I need to first tackle some preliminaries. Some of these were already touched upon yesterday in my response to a reader. The first question is...

    Why this Decree? Wrong Question!
    There are several possible decrees. How can we settle on the one that would fit the wording of Daniel 9:25? Some have said that it needs to be an official decree, like Cyrus's. That is what a decree is, after all; an official, royal, public proclamation. Not a private, or semi-private permission like that of Artaxerxes to Nehemiah.

    But the problem is that Daniel 9:25 doesn't specifically refer to a decree at all. Instead of the usual word for decree - and one that is more or less semantically limited to that narrow definition - we have a very significant word instead - "word" (Hebrew, DVR)! This word, in the eighteen places in the Bible it is used in this particular form more often than not refer to communications that are not decrees. 1

    Some interesting points of usage of DVR: Daniel 9 is the only prophetic passage - or book - that uses the word. A third of all the uses (6 out of 18) are from Esther, one of them being the tipsy king's summon for Vashti to show herself for the amusement of his guests. On the other end of the scale, some of the references are to God, to His commandments. 2

    Why this Commandment? A much better question.
    The main reason why this commandment of Artaxerxes (Neh. 2) fits is that the details fit. Daniel 9:25 speaks of rebuilding the city - not the temple - and the permission of Nehemiah deals with this as well, Neh. 2:5, 8. Ezra's edict as recorded in Ezra 1:1 - 4 makes no mention of building the city. So, to be concise:

    Ezra's edict makes no mention of rebuilding the city, just the temple.
    Gabriel in Dan. 9:25, by contrast, mentions only the city being rebuilt, not the temple.
    The two don't match.

    The permission by Artaxerxes Longimannus, Neh. 2, certainly does match.
    It matches precisely in detail.
    It matches perfectly in timing.

    Well, it didn't always seem to match perfectly in the timing - and it may not match in your study Bible notes - but that was the fault of more recent historians 3 and certain Study Bible editors.

    Related article:
    The History of an Error: Bad Dates Can Lead to Bad Theology.

    The previous articles were:
    454 BC: SeventyWeeks = One Unit
    454 BC:The SeventyWeeks Begin
    Answering a Response to Yesterday's Article


    Notes
    1. (Wilson's Old Testament Word Studies, "command" p.87 - 88, "word" p.488). Wilson's is an excellent resource.

    2. Among the Jewish teachers the word has often been referred to the Messiah, Christ, the "Servant" of the latter chapters of Isaiah. We see this even in the Bible. See David's prayer concerning the temple, using this very word: 2 Sam. 7:21 and 1 Chron. 17:19, two verses referring to the same prayer sentence. One translates the word as "word", the other as "servant".

    3. The following is from J.P. Burns (emphasis added):
    "The date which stands in our Bibles for the 20th year of Artaxerxes is B.C. 446. This makes the commencement of his reign B.C. 465; but the date fixed by the best and most nearly contemporary historian will put the matter in a different light. Thucydides mentions that the accession of Artaxerxes had taken place before the flight of Themistocles. This authorizes us to adopt Ussher's date and to place the commencement of the reign 473 or 474 B.C. This would give the date of 454 or 455 B.C. as his twentieth year and the date of the commission."
     
    #29 asterisktom, Feb 13, 2010
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 13, 2010
  10. asterisktom

    asterisktom Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 29, 2007
    Messages:
    4,202
    Likes Received:
    607
    Faith:
    Baptist
    #30 asterisktom, Feb 13, 2010
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 13, 2010
  11. Darrell C

    Darrell C Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2010
    Messages:
    9,631
    Likes Received:
    332
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Hi Jerome,

    Just wanted to say thanks for that.

    The quotes show a continuity of doctine held today from ages past.

    God bless.
     
  12. Darrell C

    Darrell C Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2010
    Messages:
    9,631
    Likes Received:
    332
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Hi to all.

    Another question, I hope this one will be answered.

    So it would seem that you do not advocate interpreting Daniel by comparing scripture that I myself would consider to be in relation to this prophecy.

    Here is an easy one.

    Daniel 9:26 & 27, 11:20-39 (not discounting the rest of the book, only trying to localize my question) have much in common.

    In the latter, it is certainly not Messiah who is referred to.

    I am aware of what I believe to be the near-fulfillment of Antiochus Epiphanes, and am not looking for a history lesson about Syria and Egypt.

    The question is this: the prince of the covenant (most assuredly not the New Covenant, which was established by the blood of Messiah) of 11:22: is Daniel speaking of two separate princes and covenants?

    God bless.
     
  13. OldRegular

    OldRegular Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Messages:
    22,678
    Likes Received:
    64
    Keep sighing Jerome, perhaps you will read before you sound off or as they used to say in the USN: Don't let your battleship mouth get ahead of your rowboat "Whatever"!:wavey::wavey::wavey:
     
  14. Jerome

    Jerome Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2006
    Messages:
    9,796
    Likes Received:
    700
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I find it hard to believe that Lumpkin would deny that that the 1644 Confession mentioned the resurrection.

    Again, whose words are these that you posted?
    Are these Lumpkin's exact words or are you paraphrasing him or what?
     
    #34 Jerome, Feb 13, 2010
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 13, 2010
  15. OldRegular

    OldRegular Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Messages:
    22,678
    Likes Received:
    64
    Getting back to the purpose of the OP. There can be little doubt that much of dispensational doctrine is based on a faulty interpretation of Daniel's 70th week.:smilewinkgrin::smilewinkgrin:
     
  16. olegig

    olegig New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2010
    Messages:
    342
    Likes Received:
    0
    As they say: "The proof is in the pudding."

    The author of the OP does not seem to want to taste his pudding; but we will humor him and given time I don't see how the taste test of his thesis can be avoided.

    For the sake of argument, I am willing to grant the OP its thesis for the time being just to see where it takes us.

    OldRegular, have you as yet re-arranged your time-line based on scripture?
     
  17. asterisktom

    asterisktom Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 29, 2007
    Messages:
    4,202
    Likes Received:
    607
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The author of the OP is extremely busy elsewhere. This will have to wait.
     
  18. asterisktom

    asterisktom Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 29, 2007
    Messages:
    4,202
    Likes Received:
    607
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Sounds good. I have always found you to be courteous in your responses.

    Did you see the chart I uploaded? I believe the final 3 and a half years follow right after the crucifixion, leading on to the conversion of Paul and the turning to the Gentiles with the Gospel. Others of my theological persuasion differ, seeing the final 3 and a half years as coinciding with the Jewish Civil War, which last exactly that long. Of course that would entail a gap, albeit a smaller one. However I am not convinced of that view.

    But as far as "the timeline not working out too well": I think you are focusing especially on those events of 26-27, correct? But not all the events in this prophecy need be within those seventy weeks. Some of the details of the forthcoming desolation are certainly connected to, but not part of, the prophecy.

    There is a difference between divine determination and actual fulfillment. Christ said "Your house is left to you desolate" years before the actual desolation.
    Confirmation, by definition, always assumes prior existence of the thing being confirmed. Yes, it is new and old at the same time, in the same way that 1 John speaks of God's commandment being both new and old.

    "The promise existed, but the covenant itself did not."

    This would be the case if we were speaking of man. God's promise of a covenant is a covenant.Though it was spiritual it was solid enough for the saints of Hebrews 11 to base their lives on.
     
  19. asterisktom

    asterisktom Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 29, 2007
    Messages:
    4,202
    Likes Received:
    607
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I do believe in comparing scripture with scripture yet, as a general rule, it is always advisable to first compare contiguous verses before reaching for passages all around the Bible. And this passage before us, having "the Prince" repeated in very close connection, needs to - at least - be considered as a whole.

    Yes, as you no doubt know, this has to do with Syrian and Egyptian history, most of it inter-testamental. The "covenant" in 22 is not God's covenant, but Ptolemy's, if I remember correctly. But in these verse I noticed several references to God's covenant ("holy covenant"). Yes, this would be the New Covenant. The same one described in the middles passages of Jeremiah.
    Like I said, this would be a different covenant at 22. A different prince two. I am not disputing that there not other covenants and princes in the Bible. I just believe it is reading such differences into Daniel 9 - specific passage with a specific purpose (as Gabriel states at the beginning of it). The purpose of Dan. 11 is to assure the saints that, throughout all the bewildering turns of events, God is totally in control.
     
  20. olegig

    olegig New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2010
    Messages:
    342
    Likes Received:
    0
    Don't worry about it a bit. It really needs no response at this time.
    Like I said, I am happy to concede your points in Daniel for the time being and interested in your outcome.

    The reason of interest is that your outcome could very well be the outcome of the prophecies had all Israel believed that Jesus was the promised Messiah.

    There always seems to be at least 2 routes of fulfillment, that which could have been, and that which is, all depending on the choices of man.

    Isn't God great!
     
    #40 olegig, Feb 15, 2010
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 15, 2010
Loading...