Christian Democrats???

I don't know, maybe you need to go back and reconsider what you just posted. Your idiotic tirade apparently has caused you some confusion.:BangHead:

 

My tirade was spot on. You ain't presented no factual evidence about the consequences of a Romney presidency cause it ain't happened. So you need to be beating your head against the wall for that.:laugh:

 

Bub, tell me which President in the past that converted people to their religion from the office of President? When you prove that anyone has converted to any religion because of who the President is I will concede to your idiotic tirade.

 

That has NOTHING to do with your statement. And the name is Zaac. Nobody said anything about converting anyone to a President's religion so stop trying to NOW change the subject.

You spoke as someone without factual evidence of the consequences of a Romney Presidency that hasn't happened.

So deal with what you DID say instead of what I did NOT say.

 

Such a short memory, let me assist your memory:

Bub, how is that for dealing with what you did say?

 

The name is still Zaac. And you still haven't dealt with how you stated as fact the consequences of something that hasn't happened. And you seem to be losing it here.

 

Look bub, I know it is easier to redirect instead of trying to prove your claim of "religious consequnces" but you are just looking silly. I will leave you to yourself. :thumbs:

 

Might explain why you keep trying to unsuccessfully do it. :laugh:

You're looking pretty silly yourself and you still haven't provided that factual evidence about the consequences of something that hasn't happened. But you're still quiet as crickets to THAT fact.

Bub is fine with that.

 

Playing semantics doesn't put a shine on it. It's still over the top hyperbole.

 

What I said didn't have anything to do with semantics but rather YOUR misunderstanding. You thought I was calling them THE AntiChrist. I wasn't. You were mistaken and thus your statement was unneeded so stop trying to build a platform to make your "over the top hyperbole" point pertinent.

 

I suggest what God's word commands. :Obedience is better than sacrifice. -Zaac.

Saying "obedience" isn't very specific. What specifically do you suggest ought to be done on election day?

 

Wrong quote- will try again.

 

What's not specific about obedience?

The Greatest Commandment says “‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind. Matt. 22:36

If endorsing a man who worships another god is a display of the love folks have for Jesus Christ and the things He has tasked the Christian to do, then vote for the man who worships another god.

We can make every excuse in the book to justify supporting a member of this cult, but the excuses amount to the same ones that people have given for why it's okay to be a homosexual.

 

:thumbs::thumbs::thumbs:

 

So you're all in on the "there will be no religious consequences" too? How do y'all know this?

 

I thought you'd give a nonanswer again.

I have a feeling that you are either secretly in the tank for Obama or are a troll looking for sport.

 

And I have the feeling that's another excuse folks on here will use to deflect from the obvious disobedience.

Now if we could just get Christians as passionate about making excuses to share the Gospel as folks on here are about making excuses for why they will endorse a man who worships a false god, some folks might get saved.

From my perspective, they are both anti-Christs so it means nothing to me when folks try to make one out to be a better choice than the other. I'm not voting for either.

 

Pot meet kettle.

 

You're always talking about that pot and kettle. Why don't you get the new Paula Deen kitchen set and stop worrying about pots and kettles?

 

I got the EmerilWare set a few months ago. Solid stuff.:laugh: