Comparison Charts

Discussion in '2004 Archive' started by Kidz-4-HIM, Mar 14, 2004.

  1. Kidz-4-HIM

    Kidz-4-HIM
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2003
    Messages:
    405
    Likes Received:
    0
    Here are two compare Bible with bible links.

    Chart 1

    Chart 2

    Cline
     
  2. tinytim

    tinytim
    Expand Collapse
    <img src =/tim2.jpg>

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2003
    Messages:
    11,250
    Likes Received:
    0
    All you have proven is that the MVs Don't match the KJV.

    Big deal!!
    Did you notice the KJV 1611 background.
    It doesn't match the 1769 verses that are printed.

    Prove the KJV is God's only word from the KJV, and I'll shut-up.

    The burden of proof is on you since you claim that one version is ONLY God's word.

    The only proof you've shown so far is just smokescreens to hide your man-made myth.
     
  3. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards
    Expand Collapse
    <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    Lies I found on the linked page:

    I.- lie #1 & #2
    1Co 16:22 - Lord Jesus Christ - Lord - Lord - Lord
    1Co 16:23 Lord Jesus Christ - Lord Jesus - Lord Jesus - Lord Jesus

    Omitted:
    1 Co 16:24 - Christ Jesus - Christ Jesus - Christ Jesus

    In fact all four translations have "Lord, Jesus, Christ"
    in the three verses 1 Corinthians 16:22-24.
    Is it really necessary for the Doctrine of Jesus,
    the Christ and our Lord that we read
    the KJV which says: "... Lord Jesus Christ ... Lord
    Jesus Christ ... Christ Jesus"?

    II - lie III
    "John 4:42 Jn 4:42 the Christ, the Saviour - the Savior - the Savior - the Savior"

    Interesting, this is quoting the Samaritan Woman.
    Is it really likely that she would get the Catholic
    philosophy of 500AD correct in 31AD? Sorry,
    i think she though and confessed that Jesus
    had saved her from the ghosts of husbands past,
    not that He was the chosen one of God who
    was to come to the Jews. Come on, she was
    Samaritian, not Jewish.


    III - final statements
    Interstiing, i have time to check two entries
    and i find three lies. Not a good sign of
    the message at that link nor the concept
    that they sponsor.

    Ed, Bible believer: the NIV, the NLT, the NASB
    are all real physical Bibles: full of the true
    written Word of God and in a language that I
    understand. And one of these days i'm likely to
    get torqued when people bash my Bibles.

    [​IMG]
     
  4. tinytim

    tinytim
    Expand Collapse
    <img src =/tim2.jpg>

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2003
    Messages:
    11,250
    Likes Received:
    0
    "And one of these days i'm likely to
    get torqued when people bash my Bibles."

    Imagine how God must feel about a child of his slandering his word, and doubting his preservation power.

    not to mention using crooked scales when judging.
     
  5. Watchman

    Watchman
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2003
    Messages:
    2,706
    Likes Received:
    0
    Brother Ed:
    Upon checking those versions side-by-side at biblegateway, you are, again, absolutely correct. You would think that people who would put up what, I guess, is a Christian web sight, would speak the truth.
    tinytim:
    Hey! Something we agree on.
    "All you have proven is that the MV's don't match the KJV."
    Good point. The Gospel accounts (Matthew, Mark, Luke and John) do not read the same on many points, that does not make one or more of them false.
     
  6. NaasPreacher (C4K)

    NaasPreacher (C4K)
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    26,806
    Likes Received:
    78
    Battling Bible Exclusive Versionists lying - NO!! I am shocked!!!!
     
  7. Jeffrey H

    Jeffrey H
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2003
    Messages:
    362
    Likes Received:
    1
    Kidz-4-Him,

    Your point? What is your question?

    --Jeff
     
  8. Jeffrey H

    Jeffrey H
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2003
    Messages:
    362
    Likes Received:
    1
    Kidz-4-Him,

    You appear to be a "hit and run" guy. You post something and never respond. Do you want to dialogue or are you afraid that your mind will be changed about "KJV onlyism"? Remember, this is a discussion board.

    If "hit and run" is your tactic, then I will refrain from responding to any topic you start.

    --Jeff
     
  9. Phillip

    Phillip
    Expand Collapse
    <b>Moderator</b>
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2001
    Messages:
    6,708
    Likes Received:
    0
    This is simply my personal opinion, but I think I know the mindset of a person who posted like this. He is KJVO, was converted to KJVOism by something as simple as a chart showing the differences in translations, not understanding the full background.

    In his mind, he thought he would convert everybody to KJVO only, because to him it was clear, but he is dealing with people who are more educated on the subject matter.

    This is not to be demeaning, but I find that most KJVOs are weak in their understanding of Bible history and translation. He thought we would all convert and when we didn't, he lost his only argument. ;)
     
  10. Askjo

    Askjo
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2003
    Messages:
    3,736
    Likes Received:
    0
    The JW bible (the cult) and modern versions are gone back to the W/H text. How sad! :(
     
  11. Scott J

    Scott J
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2001
    Messages:
    8,462
    Likes Received:
    0
    The JW's were founded with the KJV...

    Now to both your statement and mine I say.....SO WHAT?!?!?
     
  12. HankD

    HankD
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2001
    Messages:
    15,147
    Likes Received:
    322
    So was Joseph Smith's religion, Ellen White's, Mary Baker Eddy's, Jim Jones', David Koresh', etc, etc, etc...

    I'll ditto Scott's "so what".

    HankD
     
  13. robycop3

    robycop3
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2000
    Messages:
    7,573
    Likes Received:
    10
    Hey, Kidz:

    When are ya gonna come up with something ORIGINAL? People have been displaying similar charts since 1973, and they're as meaningless now as they were then.

    There are many differences between narrations of the same events within the KJV. Care to post a chart of THEM?
     
  14. uhdum

    uhdum
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2001
    Messages:
    355
    Likes Received:
    0
    Your theory makes sense... since this describes me to the "Tee." Riplinger and a few well-placed charts got me into it... I came to this board "certain" of my KJVO position because of Mrs. Riplinger and her charts. Upon finding this board and researching some of the evidence given by some of you (and some who are no longer here), I changed my position.

    One thing, honestly, that made me question my own position as a KJVO when I joined here 3 years ago was, to be honest, the shallowness of the arguments given by some of my KJVO brethren. I was sitting here thinking, "I believe as they do... but our arguments just aren't working... even for me." I was able, I believe, to objectively look at both sides and determined which one presented the best evidence. I opted for supporting MV's.
     
  15. tinytim

    tinytim
    Expand Collapse
    <img src =/tim2.jpg>

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2003
    Messages:
    11,250
    Likes Received:
    0
    See GOd is still opening the eyes of the blind today.

    Wonderful testimony, Uhdum!!
     
  16. Askjo

    Askjo
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2003
    Messages:
    3,736
    Likes Received:
    0
    JW and MVs omitted, added and changed any doctrine of Bible. They are almost the same. They are "common" bible versions. :rolleyes:

    Cline gave you his excellent point with his index finger at 2 charts where MV supporters dislike.
     
  17. gb93433

    gb93433
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2003
    Messages:
    15,496
    Likes Received:
    6
    JW and MVs omitted, added and changed any doctrine of Bible. They are almost the same. They are "common" bible versions. :rolleyes:

    Cline gave you his excellent point with his index finger at 2 charts where MV supporters dislike.
    </font>[/QUOTE]I guess you haven't read the NWT then.
     
  18. Archangel7

    Archangel7
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2003
    Messages:
    513
    Likes Received:
    0
    First of all, there isn't a single major Christian doctrine affected by the modern versions in light of the teaching of Scripture *as a whole.* Not a one.

    Secondly, if you want to play the "modern versions are like the JW Bible" game, it can also be played with the KJV. Consider these examples from the KJV and the NWT (the JW Bible) --

    John 14:14 -- Denial of the deity of Christ by denial of prayer to Christ

    KJV If ye shall ask any thing in my name, I will do it.
    NWT If YOU ask anything in my name, I will do it.

    NASB "If you ask *Me* anything in My name, I will do it."

    NIV You may ask *me* for anything in my name, and I will do it.


    Romans 8:26 -- Denial of the personality of the Holy Spirit by use of impersonal pronoun with reference to the Holy Spirit

    KJV ...but the Spirit *itself* maketh intercession for us with groanings which cannot be uttered.
    NWT ...but the spirit *itself* pleads for us with groanings yet unuttered.

    NASB ...the Spirit *Himself* intercedes for us with groanings too deep for words;

    NIV ...but the Spirit *himself* intercedes for us with groans that words cannot express.


    Titus 2:13 -- Denial of the divinity of Christ by separating "God" and "Saviour"

    KJV ...the glorious appearing of *the great God* and *our Saviour* Jesus Christ
    NWT ...and glorious manifestation of *the great God* and of *our Savior Christ Jesus*

    NASB ...the appearing of the glory of *our great God and Savior*, Christ Jesus;

    NIV ...the glorious appearing of *our great God and Savior*, Jesus Christ,


    2 Peter 1:1 -- Denial of the divinity of Christ by separating "God" and "Saviour"

    KJV ...through the righteousness of *God* and *our Saviour* Jesus Christ
    NWT ...by the righteousness of our *God* and *[the] Savior* Jesus Christ

    NASB ...by the righteousness of *our God and Savior*, Jesus Christ:

    NIV ...through the righteousness of *our God and Savior* Jesus Christ


    And so on. You see how it goes.
     
  19. Jeffrey H

    Jeffrey H
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2003
    Messages:
    362
    Likes Received:
    1
    Kidz-4-Him,

    You started this. I want to hear from you.

    --Jeff
     
  20. Askjo

    Askjo
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2003
    Messages:
    3,736
    Likes Received:
    0
    [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG]
     

Share This Page

Loading...