ConocoPhillips chops jobs, spending

Why are you surprised ? The "progressives" have been wanting us off fossil fuels for decades. I would think you'd be happy about this.

 

The oil companies must view themselves in a larger context...see themselves as energy business and adapt and be the leaders in producing the new sources of energy we need. Just as 100 years ago, if you were a buggy manufacturer, you had better have seen yourself in the transportation industry and start building automobiles. Companies with a myopic view of their industry and their place in the economy expire. Those who take a broader view, survive and thrive. Fossil fuels have their place, and will for many years. However, until we gain independence in all forms of energy; oil, gas, solar, hydro, nuclear, wind, and others; we will find ourselves in wars over the competition for limited resources controlled by hostile nations. America needs, and has needed for years, to become independent of foreign sources to fuel our economy and lifestyle. The issue is not oil or no oil; the issue is energy independence.

 

Wow Ken, when will this nightmare end? More job losses.

 

So perhaps the left should let us drill for our own oil and put up some nukes. It's they that truly stand in our way.

I still don't know why this is a surprise.

 

Most I know on the left want to drill but want to do it responsibly so we don't ruin the creation God put us in dominion of. Nuclear power, we still haven't figured out what to do with the waste. Until we do, it is the path to self-destruction.

 

What does Europe do with it's waste ?

And responsibility my foot. What the left does is nothing short of obstructionist.

Which is why when I hear a "progressive" complain about layoffs & "energy independence" I wanna puke.

 

It's a false choice to say it's either energy independence or destroy the environment. We can have both.

Yes We Can!

 

Apparently, we can't. The left won't let it even come up for debate. Pelosi & Reid have shut down every attempt. They are the ones who want us beholden to foreign oil.

FTR, I am NOT for destroying the environment. That was you typing words in my mouth.

 

Sure we can both have energy independence and still destroy the environment.

 

It is not my intention to misrepresent your words. Thanks for clarifying. However, are you misrepresenting Pelosi and Reed's position...saying they want us 'beholden to foreign oil'? Somehow I doubt that is their position.

 

They won't even let it come up on the floor. And they did try to pass a few bills recently, on weekends, no less, to pre-emptively block drilling in millions of acres. If you want, I will take the time to look up the links, but I think you know I don't purposefully tell untruths.

Sorry I misspelled Harry's name, and you are right. The cognitive skills of the both of them probably don't handle cause & effect principles very well.

And maybe they did it just to block Bush, like a few republicans did to Clinton on a few issues. Maybe the both of them are just playing politics. That doesn't make them any better in my eyes.

 

Actually, I think you were right and I was wrong on the spelling.

 

Cool avatar. :wavey:

 

Incorrect, We have our own ability to drill, build refineries, etc. The oil industry is far form dying.

 

Incorrect. Learn to read what I said. I never said the oil industry is dying, but we do need other sources as well.

 

Well that is what you insinuated suggesting if they do not encompass bad sources of energy they will die. So why else would they die?

 

Because any business that limits its market by defining itself too narrowly runs that risk. And I wouldn't call those other sources "bad". Howdya figure?