It seems to me from my own personal reading that many "mainstream" conservative commentaries are reformed leaning. While generally sticking to believers baptism and such they tend to imply calvinism. When I mean "mainstream", I am refering to NICNT: New Internatioal commentary new testament NIGTC: New International Greek testament commentary BECNT: Baker Exegetical commentary new testament PNTC: Pillar New Testament Commentary and the conservative entries of the WBC (Word Biblical Commentary). Anyway, I am only drawing from my own experience which is as follows, Carson: John (PNTC) Schreiner: Romans (BECNT) Moo: Romans (NICNT) Mounce: 1 Timothy (WBC) Lane: Mark (NICNT) Hafemann: 2 Corinthians (NIVapp) O'Brien: Ephesians (PNTC) and so on, I am getting tired of thinking of them. Can anybody else confer with my intuition on this one? Are most commentary writers in these series reformed or am I just reading the ones that are?