1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Cooperative Program and affiliation

Discussion in 'General Baptist Discussions' started by agedman, Dec 17, 2011.

  1. John of Japan

    John of Japan Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,356
    Likes Received:
    1,776
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Thanks for correcting me. This is good to know.
     
  2. preachinjesus

    preachinjesus Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2004
    Messages:
    7,406
    Likes Received:
    101
    Well if there is no denominational structure within to work it is not actually "denominational" work.

    We have a ton of non-denominational work going on that isn't quantifiable because it isn't part of a larger denomination. Just saying it is larger without any actual evidence doesn't work well here.

    So we go back to established denominational statistics which are traceable and quantifiable. Here, again, the SBC is the largest representative. Listen if there is good IFB or other independent, non-denon work going on that's awesome, but the conversation here is about things and movements that are traceable. :)

    Well I would disagree that social justice part is part of the action of Great Commission. It is vital to the action of doing the Gospel (but that isn't the point.)

    I actually don't know about whether this happens or not. The reality is you can go to the North America Mission Board's stats and find out. The largest, organized force for church planting in the US is the SBC. That is a great thing. Also, international church planting is, again in terms of organized, trackable movements, primarily done the most through the SBC.

    The one great thing about the SBC is that at the center of all of its efforts is seeking to further the Gospel. It does it best through the Cooperative Program which is the genius of the denomination. It works because it unifies the churches which make up the SBC and realizes we are stronger together than apart. We pool our resources and, in the end, create one of the greatest forces for missions and church planting in the history of the Church. :)
     
  3. Crucified in Christ

    Crucified in Christ New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2009
    Messages:
    369
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think that if we use reason here, we can understand how your position at that church would be untenable based on your position in regard to the Cooperative program. The problem (reading between the lines) was not that you supported missions independent of the CP, but that refused to give at all through the CP. If the church advocates the CP and strongly supports the CP, then a pastor who does not trust it is not going to be a workable match.

    I serve in a church that supports many non-CP missions, yet we are also big supporters of the CP. I would dare say a future pastor who felt he could not support the CP would not last long. Any major position within a church that its own pastor cannot support is sure to cause some problems. Some problems are so large that they will tend to send a minister packing. Let us not be naive.
     
  4. agedman

    agedman Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2011
    Messages:
    11,023
    Likes Received:
    1,108
    Faith:
    Baptist
    No doubt there are gaps, but not in my understanding of what took place, and certainly not what was happening within the cooperative board at that time, glfredrick.

    I asked for the current thinking of SB churches.

    From what has been posted so far, the accountability and local decision making is still a problem as well as the thinking that leadership must give to the cooperative program in order to remain both in leadership and SB.


    In both posts, you seem to want to place blame at my feet. I didn't create the cooperative board, but I wanted information and wasn't given it. I didn't threaten anyone, but retaliation certainly came. I didn't make an issue of it at the local church, but certain folks did and then covered up their sin when my family left.

    You have attempted to state that I was some how bitter, or out of step.

    I would deny both.

    I admitted from the first post that I am decades from any substantial contact with the SBC. I also clearly stated and repeated in a later post the questions.

    Let me very clear. Some 40 years ago, the cooperative board ruled the SBC through various means. Some of that hold was through the dissemination of propaganda and leadership control especially of key SB churches. A few decades ago I casually read newspaper accounts of the SB president attempting to address some of the same issues. I didn't attend to specifics, but prayed that Godly folks would make changes. So, it wasn't just my problem, my bitterness, my being out of step... and for you to either assume or actually post such an assumption isn't correct.

    I am not being critical of the current cooperative program. If I were involved, perhaps I might, but I am not. I merely sought information.
     
  5. John of Japan

    John of Japan Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,356
    Likes Received:
    1,776
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The IFB efforts are easily traceable and quantifiable. My board (www.baptistworldmission.org) has 330 missionaries, BMM has 1000 (fr. their website), etc. A 2008 survey of IFBs revealed over 13,700 churches (less than half the SBC) but more foreign missionaries than the IMB. (I can get exact figures if you wish.)

    But even without the IFB movement, I believe that Wycliffe is larger than the IMB. The IMB is not the largest board, with "6600 career and short term members" (http://www.wycliffe.org/ContactUs/FrequentlyAskedQuestions.aspx#involved).
    Please edify me as to how social justice is part of the Great Commission. I have a good library on missiology and don't remember a single missiologist making this claim.
    I do thank God for the efforts of the SBC to reach the world for Christ. My son is working on his dissertation under Dr. David Alan Black at SEBTS. I'm very impressed with SEBTS's dedication to the Great Commission, and how Dr. Black takes frequent trips to minister in various fields, and calls himself a missionary first and Greek prof second.

    However, there is a mess on the mission fields of the world due to the IMB's failure to require even something so basic as signing the Faith and Message until fairly recently. In Japan, the Japanese convention's seminary is rife with neo-orthodoxy. The convention is so liberal that I have been told (can't verify) that the Japanese convention broke fellowship with the IMB missionaries over the signing requirement. In our town in Japan, the Japanese pastor of the nearest convention churches preaches against Hell, and for dialogue with homosexuals.
     
    #25 John of Japan, Dec 23, 2011
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 23, 2011
  6. agedman

    agedman Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2011
    Messages:
    11,023
    Likes Received:
    1,108
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Why? In my day, I had questions as far as policy, planning, funding, and cover-up. As any church member in the SB, I had a right to ask, and seek the answers irregardless of being in a leadership position or not.


    I commend you for your mission mindedness. Would that a lot more churches and membership would not only financially support but be physically involved in the total witnessing package.

    However, I do take a bit of issue over the idea that the pastor has to blindly support any program of the SBC or be sent packing.

    SB churches are quite vocal about being independent of any hierarchical ruling system, yet some of the posts would indicate that isn't the case. The fact is (based upon postings on this thread) that it is naive for the local SB church to think they function independent and without the influence (and all the baggage that comes with it) of the convention and especially the cooperative board.

    That is not to say that all things evil come from the board, but it is a statement of who (in the past was) is driving the convention and, as it is allowed to filter down, the local churches.
     
Loading...