1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Featured Could God impart independency

Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by Luke2427, Dec 4, 2013.

  1. Luke2427

    Luke2427 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2010
    Messages:
    7,598
    Likes Received:
    23
    Post 57 already answers all of this.

    The choice, not just the ability to choose, but the choice itself- is it of God?
     
  2. thisnumbersdisconnected

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2013
    Messages:
    8,448
    Likes Received:
    0
    Seems to me Post # 57 raises more questions than it answers.

    That would imply that God created evil, suffering, pestilence, famine, disease. Really???


    Have you ever bothered to look up the definition of a contra-causal effect? You seem to assume the only form of free will is classic dualistic free will, which demands that the choice lie either with the chooser, or with God, and that there can be no in-between. However, the relationship between parent and child proves the existence of contra-causal free will beyond a shadow of a doubt. I've watched you deny the existence of the concept through this and other threads, and frankly, it's driving us all to moribundity. You don't know what you're talking about.

    Take the parent-child example. A parent disciplines the child as an effort to correct the child's behavior. The child chooses the behavior again rather than obey the parent. The process is repeated, with slightly greater success, but again, the child chooses the behavior against the parent's knowledge of what is in the child's best interest.

    The parent is actually unable to make the choice for the child. The only thing the parent can do is attempt to influence the child's choices through discipline, education, and love. This is precisely the way God drives our desire to know Him. He can't, without violating our freedom -- and He simply won't do that -- make the choice for us, so what He does is do the same thing the parent does. He provides evidence, correction, enlightenment, education, and influence that helps us understand that the only real, correct choice is faith in Him. This is contra-causal free will. It exists in the world around you. It exists between God and man, and your denials won't change that.

    Actually, that's ridiculous. Does God tell you what foods you will like and dislike? Is it His determination, or your own? If you say "His," you're wrong, and haven't been listening.

    The ability for us to choose lies with us, but that ability is given to us, and influenced by, God Himself. Refute it if you can, but logically, you can't.
     
  3. Skandelon

    Skandelon <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2003
    Messages:
    9,638
    Likes Received:
    1
    Actually, the parent COULD drug the child making them desire to obey, right?

    Apparently, some think that is the only way God could work to accomplish his purposes...through irresistible means. This is such a small view of the divine, IMO...having to play both sides of the chess board to ensure victory... a very limited perspective indeed.
     
  4. thisnumbersdisconnected

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2013
    Messages:
    8,448
    Likes Received:
    0
    :laugh: Then again, is not being able to do anything at all really "obedience," or something else?

    Exactly. Seems prevalent in these parts occasionally.

    [​IMG]

    Ow! Ow! Ow! Ow! Ow!
     
  5. Luke2427

    Luke2427 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2010
    Messages:
    7,598
    Likes Received:
    23
    So you reject fact because you don't LIKE it????

    Evil is not something God created because evil, like darkness is not someTHING. Darkness is the absence of light. It cannot be created. It is nothing. It is only the ABSENCE of something. Evil is the absence of good. It is not something created just as darkness is not something created. So no, God is not the creator of evil- neither is anything else the creator of evil.

    But that's beside the point. Arminians reject facts because they do not like what they THINK they imply. They don't CARE about what is obviously true. They just care about what they WANT to believe.

    In this little diatribe you make no arguments. You share no pertinent information. You just insult. This is what Arminians often do. You don't have facts. You don't have arguments. You deny common sense. You don't have the preponderance of scholarship on your side. So you do this silly mess above.

    That's not true!!

    Why do you think God simply WON'T do that. That is question begging in the highest degree.

    No. He doesn't.

    and life, breath, the electrical impulses that cause the synopses in the brain, and thought, and will, and existence, and the universe around the person and everything else. He provides it ALL.

    This is what Arminians deny.


    What does that have to do with anything? He gives me my very existence. He doesn't HAVE to verbalize commands.

    Oh, well.... if you say so.

    Oh, well.... if you say so.

    Oh, well.... if you say so.

    That's all I have been doing... refuting it logically and theologically.
     
  6. Luke2427

    Luke2427 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2010
    Messages:
    7,598
    Likes Received:
    23
    That's because you believe God can make God and you deny the fundamental doctrine of ALL OF THEISM- God's independency.
     
  7. thisnumbersdisconnected

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2013
    Messages:
    8,448
    Likes Received:
    0
    No, I reject it because it isn't true.

    Bad analogy that doesn't hold up once one actually reads the Bible. Evil is a force, a force is "something" and it is embodied in Satan.

    [​IMG]

    You think I'm an Arminian??? :laugh: You don't pay attention around here, do you?

    Selective quotes are beneath honest debaters, so I guess that shows what you are. There were no insults in that first paragraph, but there were rebukes, rightly posted toward your comments. Also, you selectively posted a quote for your attack, otherwise it wouldn't bear any weight whatsoever. So let's go ahead and post everything I said all in one place, shall we, just to be sure everyone knows what you purposefully left out? Then we'll break down your "comments."

    OK, please explain how a parent is able to force obedience, as that is precisely what your accusation here implies, it having been aimed at the second paragraph of that section of my post, and only the first sentence of the next, plus half the second sentence.

    Hardly, and in making this statement you display the classic error of the hyper-Calvinist view that is completely unbiblical, wandering into one of two extremes in regard to this question. You emphasize the sovereignty of God to the point that human beings are little more than robots simply doing what they have been sovereignly programmed to do, which is utterly absurd and unsupportable from God's word. There are others who emphasize free will to the point of God not having complete control and/or knowledge of all things, and you mistakenly place me and several others who refuse to agree with your views in that category, also untrue. Neither of these positions is biblical. The truth is that God does not violate our wills by choosing us and redeeming us. Rather, He changes our hearts so that our wills choose Him, just as the parent changes the heart and behavioral instincts of the child through love, chastisement, education, and discipline. As John wrote in his first epistle, "We love, because He first loved us" (1 John 4:19, NASB).

    What is this, kindergarten? You have no better argument than ...
    "Does too."
    "Does not."
    "Yes, He does."
    "No, He doesn't."​

    And allows it to function as He designed it, within the framework of His sovereign grace.

    It's becoming increasingly obvious you wouldn't know an Arminian from an armadillo.

    You're the one who brought it up.

    I figured you'd know what I was talking about. But it's obvious you don't understand your own arguments, much less anyone else's. God doesn't control any of these things. He gave us these things to use within the framework of His sovereign grace. If He "controlled" those things, we'd be mere robots and would give Him no glory whatsoever, given that we were doing what we were programmed to do. It is in our decisions to obey, serve and worship Him that He is truly glorified.

    Brilliant comeback.

    Refuting, yes. Logically? Theologically?

    [​IMG]

    Uh ... no.
     
    #67 thisnumbersdisconnected, Dec 11, 2013
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 11, 2013
  8. Luke2427

    Luke2427 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2010
    Messages:
    7,598
    Likes Received:
    23
    Evil is like cold and hunger. They are the absence of things- not things themselves.

    I don't think you are anything. You are speaking like an Arminian. You may not know it, but you are.

    I don't even know what you are talking about here.


    Force has nothing to do with it. If you knew what you were talking about like you try to pretend you'd know that no Calvinist believes that God generally FORCES people to do things.

    The fact that I have to tell you that means I am already wasting my time trying to educate you.

    Nobody argues any of the things you are purporting here.

    I was pointing out that that is what you were doing. You just keep CLAIMING things without supporting them.

    You say "This is so." OH!!! Well since you say so!!


    You don't know what you're talking about. I was an Arminian- a REAL Arminian. I was educated in an Arminian bible college. I was a Free Will Baptist preacher for more than a decade.

    You need to learn to get information before you speak. I makes you look foolish.

    [/QUOTE]

    You're not making arguments. You're just SAYING stuff.

    I might as well respond with "Rubber babby buggy bumpers."
     
  9. agedman

    agedman Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2011
    Messages:
    11,023
    Likes Received:
    1,108
    Faith:
    Baptist
    When I first heard of contra-casual free will, I actually thought, "What a tongue twisted mess!"

    I haven't been far wrong.

    There is never a time a person is "neutral" and without "cause" that molds the will.

    The child (mentioned in earlier posts) may be "willfully disobedient" not because the "freely choose" but because they are bent in that manner.

    The whole concept of "contra-casual free will" is the thinking that a person can make decisions outside of any internal or external motivations and drives.

    It is totally wrong thinking, and embraced by many of the LBGT community because they want to puff up they decide their own manner of living.

    But Romans disagree - and Paul would have no place for such "contra-casual free willy thinking.
     
  10. webdog

    webdog Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,696
    Likes Received:
    2
    That was my first reaction with prevenient grace.
    By this statement it is safe to say you know as much about contra causal freewill as you did when you first heard it, and the rest of your conclusions are merely an erected straw man based on the faulty presupposition.
     
  11. Luke2427

    Luke2427 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2010
    Messages:
    7,598
    Likes Received:
    23
    Still, the prefix "contra" means- "In contrast or opposition to; against."

    You guys like to try to make the word "responsible" mean response-ABLE.

    That's what AM is doing with your word "contra-causal."

    Either something causes a man to choose what he chooses or not. Not just INFLUENCES it- causes it.

    What is the "sufficient guarantor" of a man's choice?

    What drives a man to choose what he chooses? Can you answer that?
     
  12. webdog

    webdog Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,696
    Likes Received:
    2
    I know what it means, and the cause is the agent making the choice influenced by his circumstances, thought, etc.
     
  13. Luke2427

    Luke2427 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2010
    Messages:
    7,598
    Likes Received:
    23
    What causes the cause (the chooser)?
     
  14. agedman

    agedman Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2011
    Messages:
    11,023
    Likes Received:
    1,108
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I have turned this over in my thoughts for a while, and have decided that I refuse to link to LBGT sights that state EXACTLY what I posted as true.

    That you and apparently Scan. don't recognize the worldly view of "contra-causal-freewill" is not obliging me to accept your inaccurate statements and definitions.

    Btw, I do NOT hold that prevenient or preceding grace is biblical, it is no more aligned with Scriptures than the "contra-casual-freewill" view(s).

    Both are grounded merely in the attempt to show how someone is "awakened to the need of Christ," sustained in some "neutral" ether of non-causative freedom so that they may "choose" from a pure, undefiled, innate volition to "accept or reject" the offer of salvation. It is a humanistic invention that has no Scriptural basis, but must rely on huge assumptions that would make the modernist dispy blush.

    God gives to Christ who will be saved.

    Christ saves them.

    Simple, clean, no fuss, no mess, and no assumptions needed.
     
  15. Aaron

    Aaron Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2000
    Messages:
    20,253
    Likes Received:
    1,381
    Faith:
    Baptist
    :thumbs::thumbs:Here endeth the lesson.
     
  16. webdog

    webdog Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,696
    Likes Received:
    2
    A plethora of factors in opposition (contra) to one another.
     
  17. kyredneck

    kyredneck Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2009
    Messages:
    19,495
    Likes Received:
    2,880
    Faith:
    Baptist
    ...and the simple is made complex all because of, "Why doth he still find fault? For who withstandeth his will?"
     
  18. Luke2427

    Luke2427 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2010
    Messages:
    7,598
    Likes Received:
    23
    If it is a plethora you ought to be able to list 5 or 10 of them.
     
  19. webdog

    webdog Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    24,696
    Likes Received:
    2
    Mood, options, outcomes, mental state, and a host of other factors only the person would know as we cannot crawl into their head.
     
  20. Skandelon

    Skandelon <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2003
    Messages:
    9,638
    Likes Received:
    1
    I'd say that some even the person is not even aware of... sometimes we are not very in touch with our feelings, thoughts, habits, motives, etc and don't even know all that is effecting our choices.

    Therapy helps. :)
     
Loading...