Featured Cruz: I call upon every believer, every constitutionalist, every lover of liberty to

It's called witchcraft in the Bible.

 

Ok - let's do it your way.

If the supreme court were to rule that plural marriage is allowable - and that people may marry whoever they wish without age restrictions...

Would you contend that a Christian clerk should either issue the license or resign if someone applied for a license to marry ten year old girl triplets that are his brother's daughters?

 

Yep. If it goes against God's commands and they are telling you this is part of your job requirement, then RESIGN.

I can't be REQUIRED to do anything against what God has spoken to unless I CHOOSE to.

So again, either she's gonna do the job that the government hired her to do, or she needs to refuse to do it and resign because the law is in place.

 

Congratulations, Zaac... you get to tell us how racist and homophobic we all are in the same post. And then because we are that way, you get to pat yourself on the back for NOT being any of those things.

 

If the shoe fits...

What? You want a trophy for treating folks the opposite of how God says to treat them?

 

And that is how you believe that you treat people here?

As God says to treat them?

Really?

 

You like most folks on here are used to being able to bully anybody who disagrees with ya. Yall are just mad that I'm not the sit down and be bullied type.

And thus the always present friction.

 

You didn't answer my question.

 

Sure I did. As usual, i just didn't answer the way you expected me to answer. :laugh:

 

Why bother here if you are not willing to enter into an honest debate?

Do you think that you will ever change anyone's opinions with the way that you present yourself?

 

Why do you bother? Do you think you're gonna change truth by given your opinion and presenting yourself the way that you do?

 

I hope so - but understand that some are beyond hope.

And again - you did not answer my question.

There seems to be a pattern.

 

The type of "hope" you present leaves little to be desired.

And I did answer your question. The pattern is and always has been that if it's not answered in the manner that yall are expecting in order to continue your narrative, then you blame me for not answering.

I know the game.

 

Answers are not normally given in the form of questions.

 

As I said, i didn't answer the way YOU thought I should. But I did answer the question.

 

High school must have been very interesting for you.

 

I had a blast. I had a blast with that 10 more years of college too. :laugh:

 

Goodness... perhaps Zaac does care what others think about him - his protestations to the contrary not withstanding.

 

In other words, he's like most leftists and answers the question that makes him look like he's more spiritual and compassionate than anyone else.

This is an exercise in patting himself on the back.

 

Herein is the primary fallacy, that homo and heterosexuality are identities. They are not. They are behaviors. The terms are Freudian inventions. The term heterosexual was first applied to those that had an unnatural sexual appetite for those of the opposite sex, and the term homosexual was applied to those who had an unnatural sexual appetite for those of the same sex.

Both homosexuals and heterosexuals were deviants.

There really are no such things as heterosexuals or homosexuals. There are those who revel in sodomy.