1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Darwinists Respond to Study w/Censorship

Discussion in 'News & Current Events' started by Aaron, Jan 22, 2013.

Top Posters
  1. Aaron

    Aaron Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2000
    Messages:
    20,253
    Likes Received:
    1,381
    Faith:
    Baptist
    "A team of researchers gave a presentation at the 2012 Western Pacific Geophysics Meeting in Singapore, August 13–17, at which they gave 14C dating results from many bone samples from eight dinosaur specimens. All gave dates ranging from 22,000 to 39,000 years, right in the ‘ballpark’ predicted by creationists. But if dinosaurs really were millions of years old, there should not be one atom of 14C left in them."

    http://creation.com/c14-dinos
     
    #1 Aaron, Jan 22, 2013
  2. pinoybaptist

    pinoybaptist Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2002
    Messages:
    8,136
    Likes Received:
    3
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Hoooonesty, is such a lonely word, everyone is sooo untrue.....song by another atheist back in the early 80's.
     
    #2 pinoybaptist, Jan 22, 2013
  3. Deacon

    Deacon Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2002
    Messages:
    9,493
    Likes Received:
    1,240
    Faith:
    Baptist
    A web search quickly brings up this article.

    "DIRECT RADIOCARBON DATING OF DINOSAUR BONES AND OTHER FOSSILS-same radiocarbon age-range as that for megafauna."

    The original article and research was done before 2005.
    Interestingly enough a former professor of mine is named in the article (Dr. Wayne Frair).

    The paper brings up more questions than it answers - I can see why it was withdrawn, it's sort of like a team asking the teacher, "What did we do wrong?"

    Rob
     
    #3 Deacon, Jan 22, 2013
  4. Aaron

    Aaron Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2000
    Messages:
    20,253
    Likes Received:
    1,381
    Faith:
    Baptist
    So can I. It doesn't fit the narrative.
     
    #4 Aaron, Jan 23, 2013
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 23, 2013
  5. Aaron

    Aaron Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2000
    Messages:
    20,253
    Likes Received:
    1,381
    Faith:
    Baptist
    And neither would there be soft tissue, but, alas, that doesn't stop Darwinists special pleading to explain soft remnants of blood vessel walls inside a T-Rex bone.

    That too is easy enought to look up.
     
    #5 Aaron, Jan 23, 2013
(You must log in or sign up to post here.)
Loading...