Debunking the Palin Mythology

Discussion in 'Politics' started by JustChristian, Oct 14, 2008.

  1. JustChristian

    JustChristian
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2007
    Messages:
    3,833
    Likes Received:
    0
    Debunking the Palin Mythology

    http://www.republicansforobama.org/?q=node/2194

    Today I want to talk about Palin's fiscal record. McCain, in accepting his nomination, described his running-mate: "She's balanced a budget, cut taxes, and taken on the special interests." I have to admit that sounds nice; unfortunately the facts tell a different story.

    1. "Balanced a budget"
    McCain isn't specific enough for us to know what he means by that, but look at the town of Wasilla's budget during Palin's tenure:

    In fiscal 1996—the year before Palin took control of the budget—there was no general obligation debt. In fiscal 2003—the last fiscal year Palin approved the budget—the bonded long-term debt was $18,635,000. The long term debt was estimated at $3,000 per capita, with 6% of the municipal budget now tied up with paying down the recently-acquired debt. [Wasilla Comprehensive Annual Financial Report 2003, Table 10]

    2. "Cut taxes"

    a. as Mayor of Wasilla
    Palin did cut property taxes significantly [Anchorage Daily News 10/23/2006], but she pushed for a controversial 25% sales tax increase to support city building projects. The tax increase barely passed the referendum [CBSNews 9/9/2008]. The end result was a decrease in revenue and an increase in expenditures, leading to unprecedented debt, as noted above. In this respect Palin perfectly embodies the modern Republican mode of operation: cut taxes and increase spending; pass the bill onto the next guy.

    b. as Governor of Alaska
    Other than a hiatus on gas and tire taxes this year, Palin no record of cutting citizens' taxes as governor. And she actually raised taxes on the state's most lucrative industry when she signed into law a 1.5 billion dollar increase on the oil companies. The result? Well, according to Alaska's Tax Notes [1/7/2008]:
    After ACES was passed, ConocoPhillips, Alaska’s most active oil exploration company and one of the top three producers, announced it was canceling plans to build a diesel fuel refinery at the Kuparuk oil field. ConocoPhillips blamed the cancellation [of a new refinery] on passage of ACES [the new tax]. The refinery would have allowed the company to produce low-sulfur diesel fuel onsite for its vehicles and other uses on the North Slope, rather than haul the fuel there from existing refineries.

    3. "Taken on special interests"
    McCain likes to make it sound like Palin cuts earmarks and tackles special interests, but when you look at the record it becomes clear Palin *is* a special interest:

    According to ABCNews, while serving as mayor of Wasilla, Alaska, Palin hired Steven Silver, a former chief of staff for Sen. Ted Stevens, to lobby Congress for earmarks. Wasilla received around $27 million in federal money, about as much as Boise, Idaho. Boise has a population of 200,000 people, compared with Wasilla's 10,000.

    And in June, the Alaskan legislature, with Palin's prodding, agreed to pay Canadian energy company TransCanada $500 million as an incentive to build a natural gas pipeline.

    Palin pushed for the highly publicized "Bridge to Nowhere." As reported by the AP: Palin did abandon plans to build the nearly $400 million bridge from Ketchikan to an island with 50 residents and an airport. But she made her decision only after the project had become an embarrassment to the state, after federal dollars for the project were pulled back and diverted to other uses in Alaska, and after she had appeared to support the bridge during her campaign for governor.

    And finally, in Palin's two years in office, Alaska has requested nearly $750 million in special federal spending, by far the largest per-capita request in the nation.

    Sarah Palin, fiscal conservative? Hardly. She looks an awful lot like just another spend-happy Republican. McCain says Palin represents the future of our party. Wow. I certainly hope he's mistaken.
     
  2. carpro

    carpro
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    20,894
    Likes Received:
    294
    So what.

    She's not running for president and the left's anti- Palin bias is already well documented.

    Your desperation, and fear of a non presidential candidate, is really sort of comical, but tragic at the same time.
     
  3. dan e.

    dan e.
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2006
    Messages:
    1,468
    Likes Received:
    0
    ...but she is probably the MAIN reason that McCain is even within reach of Obama. The reason he picked her was to supposedly balance out his independent streak to appear more conservative.....so I think what Baptistbeliever is showing is that she really isn't all that conservative, just because she is pro-life (which also may be debatable) doesn't mean she's conservative.
     
  4. NaasPreacher (C4K)

    NaasPreacher (C4K)
    Expand Collapse
    Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    26,806
    Likes Received:
    78
    The longer we go the more we see that Gov Palin may be just another Republicrat in conservative clothing.
     
  5. LadyEagle

    LadyEagle
    Expand Collapse
    <b>Moderator</b> <img src =/israel.gif>
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    22,028
    Likes Received:
    1
    Perhaps, perhaps not. Time will tell.
     
  6. carpro

    carpro
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    20,894
    Likes Received:
    294
    Good for her ...and him as well. Obama needs to be defeated.

    She's still not running for president and the left's obsession with her is fearful and pathetic.
     
  7. rbell

    rbell
    Expand Collapse
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    11,103
    Likes Received:
    0
    Shouldn't this be in the "clean humor" forum?

    A "republicansforObama" website...isn't that a joke?


    :D :D
     
  8. dan e.

    dan e.
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2006
    Messages:
    1,468
    Likes Received:
    0
    It is quite possibly as ugly an obsession over her as the obsession of those on the right wanting to see Obama lose.

    vote. vote who you think is best. but don't be afraid if Obama wins, as he likely will. He will be president Obama.....not a dictator.
     
  9. LadyEagle

    LadyEagle
    Expand Collapse
    <b>Moderator</b> <img src =/israel.gif>
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    22,028
    Likes Received:
    1
    If Obama wins, he will be controlled as a puppet or he will be eliminated by the powers that be. see poncho for a full explanation.....

    LE aka conspiracy theorist re: the NWO....
     
  10. carpro

    carpro
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    20,894
    Likes Received:
    294
    At least Obama is running for president. Palin's not.

    Obama needs to lose. He is as close to pure evil as I have ever seen in a presidential candidate.
     
  11. dan e.

    dan e.
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2006
    Messages:
    1,468
    Likes Received:
    0
    Your name calling doesn't change anything....and McCain winning won't change anything either.
     
  12. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    38,287
    Likes Received:
    780

    Obama is not the legitimate DNC candidate:tonofbricks:
     
  13. LadyEagle

    LadyEagle
    Expand Collapse
    <b>Moderator</b> <img src =/israel.gif>
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    22,028
    Likes Received:
    1
  14. carpro

    carpro
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    20,894
    Likes Received:
    294
    It would change the only thing that matters.

    Obama would not occupy the the Oval Office.

    And Palin would be "just a heartbeat away " from being president. Apparently the thing that Obamanites fear the most.
     
  15. dan e.

    dan e.
    Expand Collapse
    New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2006
    Messages:
    1,468
    Likes Received:
    0
    so I don't get how you're any different from those you say that are "obsessed" with Palin?
     
  16. carpro

    carpro
    Expand Collapse
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    20,894
    Likes Received:
    294
    Of course, you don't.

    It shouldn't matter that one is runnning for president and the other isn't, should it?:rolleyes:
     
  17. JustChristian

    JustChristian
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2007
    Messages:
    3,833
    Likes Received:
    0

    So you think the position of Vice President of the United States is unimportant, trivial. Am I interpreting you correctly? Can you address the facts I presented or can you just rant and rave?
     
  18. poncho

    poncho
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    19,657
    Likes Received:
    128
    No doubt about him being controlled. He already is. He voted for the elite's proposal to rob us blind in broad daylight didn't he? For that reason I doubt the PTB will eliminate him, he's just to useful to them. Of course one of the other "global crime families" may "rub him out" if he strays into their turf.

    But I don't see that happening. He's too willing to fork our property over to them for all that.
     
  19. JustChristian

    JustChristian
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2007
    Messages:
    3,833
    Likes Received:
    0
    No, it's not a joke. Everyone who seriously considers the issues and the candidates will vote for Obama. You'll find that out the hard way in Nov.
     
  20. JustChristian

    JustChristian
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2007
    Messages:
    3,833
    Likes Received:
    0
    There's been a conspiracy for 8 years and you people still haven't caught on. At least now you're not making fun of conspiracy theories. That's a start.
     

Share This Page

Loading...