Debunking the Palin Mythology

:laugh:

You got some nerve, BB. You've skedaddled out of more threads than any other poster, here.

And every honest person here would agree with me.

Physician, heal thyself......

 

If people seriously considered the real issues and the candidates in this country you know what we'd have BB? A bipartisan lynch mob and a double hanging!

 

You said it, bro. Except I think there'd be a lot more than just two.

 

Two is all it would take to send a very strong message. Then if need be we could always have more. :smilewinkgrin:

Actually this is exactly what the global corporate elite want you to think. They want you to be so sick and tired of their last puppet you'll eagerly accept their latest one without too much fuss.

 

Wow! Well, Bless Your Heart BB!!!

My, my, my! How desperate you must be....are you not happy that your candidate is comfortably ahead in the polls? Or, are you afraid the polls may be wrong?

You'd be helping others by digging up the truth and addressing things like how BHO could sit in Wright's church more than 500 times over 20 years, and NEVER heard that Liberation Theology preached? Or, how he didn't hear Ayers infamous 9/11 comment? Or, why he donated $8,000.00, or was it $800,000.00 dollars, to Acorn [notice I used to different amounts, because now your candidate is denying it was the larger amount]; and no matter the amount, he contributed campaign money to what may be a crooked organization? Or, how your candidate has spent the majority of his US Senate time running for POTUS [I, for one think he has robbed us citizens of money paid to him for a job he hasn't spent much time at]. Again, I was being kind. Or, why Obama couldn't pass the CIA, or FBI background check????

Surely there are enough issues to address in regards to your candidates, to take up your time for the next 21 days. By the way, I know Biden apologized for his Circle K comment, but, that was quite racist, wasn't it?

Still, I want to thank you for the info on Palin. It shows you have a real gift for research. Keep up the great work, but, try redirecting to your two guys. Maybe, just maybe, you'll find some truth that could change your mind about BHO???:BangHead:

Shalom,

Pastor Paul:type:

 

Usually I let typos go, but what is a "pupit".


You are, after all, highly educated. I had to join the Navy, so do have some mercy.

 

Why are there all these Obama posts in a thread about Sarah Palin?

 

Doesn't matter who the next puppet is. What matters or should matter is that they are a puppet.

 

But the "republicans for Obama" think Obama's plan to "spread the wealth around" with a trillion dollars of new spending is a good idea?

But the "republicans for Obama" think Obama's plan allowing current tax rates to expire (which means the government raises taxes) is good idea in a slow economy? And the "republicans for Obama", no doubt, agree with Joe Biden that small businesses paying higher taxes is their "patriotic duty"? And the "republicans for Obama", no doubt, think Obama isn't pandering when he promises tax cuts to tens of millions of people who don't pay income taxes?

But the "republicans for Obama", no doubt, think a "windfall profits tax" on the oil industry will encourage CEO's to spend hundred's of millions of dollars to develop alternative sources of energy, so the Obama administration will have a new area from which to take their profits.

But the "republicans for Obama" have no problem with Obama pushing tens of millions of dollars to Rizko to build low income housing, only to have those buildings condemned and Rizko convicted of corruption. The "republicans for Obama" have no problem with Obama training leaders of ACORN, which we now know is engaged in wide-spread voter fraud. "Republicans for Obama" have no problem with Obama giving campaign money to ACORN for "get out the vote" efforts? "Republicans for Obama" have no problem with Democrats attempting to put money for ACORN into the stimulus package?

The "republicans for Obama" have no problem with Obama being the 2nd largest receptiant of money from Fannie May and Freddie Mac, while congress refused to oversee obvious mismanagement and these companies cost tax-payers billions of dollars.

The "republicans for Obama" have no problem with Obama hiring the former CEO of Fannie May (who made 10's of millions of dollars in "bonuses" based on fraudulent bookeeping) to be his financial advisor.

"Republicans for Obama", fiscal conservatives? Hardly. Republicans? Doubtful. Hatefilled, democrat cool-aid drinkers founded by ACORN? Most likely:thumbs:

peace to youraying:

 

To hear you tell it, everyone is somebody's puppet...

'cept you, of course.:wavey:

 

Better answer your phone it could be a call from the Pentagon. You know how upset those message force multipliers get when you decide to take a break from posting their propaganda pieces. :laugh:

Hail Victory!